Baja Telecaster neck shape

  • Thread starter rainfield
  • Start date
  • This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links like Ebay, Amazon, and others.

rainfield

TDPRI Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2010
Posts
20
Location
Italy
Hello everybody here. I bought a Fender Baja Telecaster in 2009. Great guitar, great pickups indeed, but I must confess the neck shape wasn't good to me. So I sold her last year. Now, I went on Fender catalogue online and I took a look to the Baja specs again. I read that the it has a soft 'V' shape neck. Could somebody make clear to me if this neck shape is the same of that 2009 Baja of mine? It is still fat or it has been reduced? Thank you in advance for eventually reading this.
 

Teleterr

Friend of Leo's
Joined
Feb 7, 2011
Posts
4,683
Location
Lewes De.
Its not what I d call a V, more a half circle w very slight V tendencies. Its way beefier than the " Soft V " MIM Strat necks.
 

raysachs

Friend of Leo's
Joined
May 21, 2017
Posts
3,099
Age
66
Location
Eugene, OR
The 50s Baja is still fat. I don't know about the soft-V part though. I've played a number of strats that were called soft-V and felt like soft-V. The Baja just felt round and full to me - I never felt a V in that neck...
 

rainfield

TDPRI Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2010
Posts
20
Location
Italy
Thank you. Do you mean the '60 Baja has a different shape from the blonde one?
 

rainfield

TDPRI Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2010
Posts
20
Location
Italy
The 50s Baja is still fat. I don't know about the soft-V part though. I've played a number of strats that were called soft-V and felt like soft-V. The Baja just felt round and full to me - I never felt a V in that neck...
Thank you...Same impression I have
 

boris bubbanov

Tele Axpert
Ad Free Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2007
Posts
60,084
Location
New Orleans, LA + in the
Thank you. Do you mean the '60 Baja has a different shape from the blonde one?

The big, chunky, "Almost V" neck is common to ALL 50s or ash bodied Bajas. No change IMO, 2006 to present.

Meanwhile, there's an entirely separate model called the "60's Baja" with a fairly slim rosewood board neck. Not thick. Not really like the 50s except for the choice of tuning machine and the fret size.
 

Ebidis

Friend of Leo's
Joined
Jun 27, 2016
Posts
2,453
Age
58
Location
Alabama
The 50s Baja is still fat. I don't know about the soft-V part though. I've played a number of strats that were called soft-V and felt like soft-V. The Baja just felt round and full to me - I never felt a V in that neck...
That's interesting, I wonder if they are a bit inconsistent, because my '50s Baja neck has a definitely noticeable V shape to it.
 

gkterry

Tele-Afflicted
Joined
Dec 19, 2014
Posts
1,597
Location
the Telecaster Forest
I would beg to differ with the claim that the 60s Baja is a slim neck. The one I have is definitely not slim. Only very slightly thinner than the Esquire reissue from a few year's back. It is definitely noticeably larger than the standard Fender C neck.
 

Gene O.

Friend of Leo's
Silver Supporter
Joined
Sep 20, 2015
Posts
2,224
Age
69
Location
NE Ohio
IMO, the Baja 50's neck most definitely is a soft V. The V shape is more pronounced up near the nut, and feels more round near the heel, but it is definitely soft.

And how close is it to the Warmoth Boat Neck?

It's been a while since I've felt the Warmoth Boat Neck shape, but as I recall the Boat is far more pronounced... not soft at all.
 

Teleterr

Friend of Leo's
Joined
Feb 7, 2011
Posts
4,683
Location
Lewes De.
And how close is it to the Warmoth Boat Neck?
Not close at all. Thats my favorite neck. I ve concidered sanding away the Baja's circular curve portion thats on the side 1/3 the way down from the fingerboard. Bajas don t give me Carpel Tunnel, so thats why I like them, but the curve instead of the V str8 on the treble side moves my hand just enough to keep me from being able to play really fast, but that might be a good thing.
 

musicalmartin

Poster Extraordinaire
Joined
Aug 8, 2007
Posts
6,589
Location
Norfolk UK
Its a soft V for the first few frets only then it gets chunky .The two I owned both had different shapes slightly at the V .
 

boris bubbanov

Tele Axpert
Ad Free Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2007
Posts
60,084
Location
New Orleans, LA + in the
I would beg to differ with the claim that the 60s Baja is a slim neck. The one I have is definitely not slim. Only very slightly thinner than the Esquire reissue from a few year's back. It is definitely noticeably larger than the standard Fender C neck.

I don't mean to offend you, but I was filled with sick amazement when I discovered that the creator of the original Baja had decide to come up with a model that ripped off the name of the first, brilliant one. Because of this terrible choice, these two models will always be compared and it is in this light that I will always refer to it as slim. Even if it is slightly larger than the too thin MIM Standard or too thin USA Standard Tele.

If your guitar was just called the Classic Player 60s Tele as it should have been called, I could then compare it to these others you mention. Frankly ALL the ones (including your 60s) are IMO too thin. All of them. Just degrees to which they're too thin.
 

sonofiam

Tele-Meister
Joined
Jan 19, 2017
Posts
214
Age
59
Location
Inland Northwest
I believe the nut width is narrower on the newer Classic Player 50's Baja and certainly on the CP 60's Baja which makes a big difference in how the "fatness" is perceived. My hands are on the smaller side and I really like the profile of the 60's with the narrower nut, it's very comfortable. I have an American Deluxe "V" Neck strat and it is probably my favorite neck of them all.
 

Rusty Stauffer

Tele-Meister
Joined
Nov 27, 2016
Posts
178
Age
70
Location
Canyon Lake, Texas
The 50s Baja is still fat. I don't know about the soft-V part though. I've played a number of strats that were called soft-V and felt like soft-V. The Baja just felt round and full to me - I never felt a V in that neck...

I have a 2008 ish Baja and neck was a soft V. My 2018 Baja is just a semi fat C shape. So I think the shape has morphed.
 
Top