Blrfl
Friend of Leo's
Did some tinkering with NAM this morning. On the whole? Qualified meh.
I'd tried NAM briefly when it first appeared and hadn't done anything with it since. I started on the computer with Reaper, the the VST that NAM distributes and a half-dozen of the most-downloaded full-rig profiles on Tone3000, with emphasis on things I've heard in person. None of that blew me away, so I decided to rule out bad captures by profiling a Helix preset I use pretty much every day that sounds like this on the hardware and Helix Native. Reverb was shut off, figuring I'd use the one built into the Pocket Master. Even on NAM's player, the result didn't really blow my skirt up and loading it onto the Pocket Master made it sound worse.
Here's where it gets qualified. Some reading revealed that NAM tends to perform better if it's profiling just the amp and the cabinet is being handled by a separate IR. That lines up with my observations of the Tone3000 profiles: the simpler the transformation, the better NAM does capturing it. So the JC120 sounds better to me than the '62 Bluesbreaker.
I did pretty much the opposite of that and kind of had to because the Pocket Master loses its IR block when running a NAM capture. To give NAM itself itself a fairer shake, I'll probably repeat this experiment another time without a cabinet in the Helix preset and the same one tacked on behind NAM.
For now, the component models built into the Pocket Master are better.
I'd tried NAM briefly when it first appeared and hadn't done anything with it since. I started on the computer with Reaper, the the VST that NAM distributes and a half-dozen of the most-downloaded full-rig profiles on Tone3000, with emphasis on things I've heard in person. None of that blew me away, so I decided to rule out bad captures by profiling a Helix preset I use pretty much every day that sounds like this on the hardware and Helix Native. Reverb was shut off, figuring I'd use the one built into the Pocket Master. Even on NAM's player, the result didn't really blow my skirt up and loading it onto the Pocket Master made it sound worse.
Here's where it gets qualified. Some reading revealed that NAM tends to perform better if it's profiling just the amp and the cabinet is being handled by a separate IR. That lines up with my observations of the Tone3000 profiles: the simpler the transformation, the better NAM does capturing it. So the JC120 sounds better to me than the '62 Bluesbreaker.
I did pretty much the opposite of that and kind of had to because the Pocket Master loses its IR block when running a NAM capture. To give NAM itself itself a fairer shake, I'll probably repeat this experiment another time without a cabinet in the Helix preset and the same one tacked on behind NAM.
For now, the component models built into the Pocket Master are better.