i own, at present, 7 guitars, plus i've got one i've rented, plus a p-bass. i probably couldn't count how many guitars i've owned, probably in the 40's or 50's. i know there's guys and gals here who have owned many, many more that that.
but of all of them you've had, or still have, which one just plain sounded the best? it might have played awful, or wonderful, but just had a sound and a presence that really stood out/stands out?
of all that i've had, the one that really stood out was a Gibson ES-339. i've owned LPs, Firebirds, SGs, and one ES-335 and they were all really good, but that 339 was impressive. it was FAT. it was LOUD. it commanded the space were ever it was. that is the only guitar i ever played for P&W and the leader asked me to turn it down. it was, for reasons i never figured out, the hardest to play Gibson i ever had in my hands. it was stubborn! it was a not particularly good looking sunburst. i do not know why in the hell i let it go, traded back to the guy i got it from. it is the only guitar i ever sold/traded off that i regretted much.
the 339 is some kind of blessed middle ground in between a LP and 335. the one i had was fatter and meaner than any LP i've had and more than the 335 i had. if you intend to play a whole lot of Cream, get you a 339: big old blues rock nirvana, IMO.
i presently have a Heritage H535 to do my Gibson thing, but this guitar of mine does not sound like a 335, it has it's own thing, a delicate upper midrange that i have never heard anywhere else. it'll get fairly Gibson-fat if i get after it a certain way, but nothing like the 339.
so what you got?
but of all of them you've had, or still have, which one just plain sounded the best? it might have played awful, or wonderful, but just had a sound and a presence that really stood out/stands out?
of all that i've had, the one that really stood out was a Gibson ES-339. i've owned LPs, Firebirds, SGs, and one ES-335 and they were all really good, but that 339 was impressive. it was FAT. it was LOUD. it commanded the space were ever it was. that is the only guitar i ever played for P&W and the leader asked me to turn it down. it was, for reasons i never figured out, the hardest to play Gibson i ever had in my hands. it was stubborn! it was a not particularly good looking sunburst. i do not know why in the hell i let it go, traded back to the guy i got it from. it is the only guitar i ever sold/traded off that i regretted much.
the 339 is some kind of blessed middle ground in between a LP and 335. the one i had was fatter and meaner than any LP i've had and more than the 335 i had. if you intend to play a whole lot of Cream, get you a 339: big old blues rock nirvana, IMO.
i presently have a Heritage H535 to do my Gibson thing, but this guitar of mine does not sound like a 335, it has it's own thing, a delicate upper midrange that i have never heard anywhere else. it'll get fairly Gibson-fat if i get after it a certain way, but nothing like the 339.
so what you got?