Why didn't les like the SG?

  • Thread starter Dwills94
  • Start date
  • This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links like Ebay, Amazon, and others.

Dwills94

Tele-Meister
Joined
Jun 10, 2011
Posts
385
Location
Troy, Ohio
i have tried to find a design specific answer to this question but all that my cursory google search turned up was that he did in fact dislike the design and gibson changed the name. im sure there are some guitar history buffs here that know specifically what les paul did't like about the sg design.
 

Stratburst

Friend of Leo's
Joined
Mar 31, 2009
Posts
2,140
Location
Toronto
From what I read, he hated the SG's neck/body joint, the thinness of the neck and the guitar's balance. He also admitted that he was divorcing Mary Ford at the time and he'd have to share any royalties from a new contract with her.
 

Dwills94

Tele-Meister
Joined
Jun 10, 2011
Posts
385
Location
Troy, Ohio
From what I read, he hated the SG's neck/body joint, the thinness of the neck and the guitar's balance. He also admitted that he was divorcing Mary Ford at the time and he'd have to share any royalties from a new contract with her.

do you think that his issues with the balance of the guitar come from his tendency (in all the pics ive seen) to play sitting down? standing up playing the sg you do have the occasional neck dive when your just standing around not playing but while playing it's usually fine, but it is a really awkward guitar to sit down and play because of it's thinness and lack of balance.
 

StrangerNY

Poster Extraordinaire
Gold Supporter
Joined
Sep 6, 2010
Posts
6,448
Location
Somewhere between here and there
do you think that his issues with the balance of the guitar come from his tendency (in all the pics ive seen) to play sitting down? standing up playing the sg you do have the occasional neck dive when your just standing around not playing but while playing it's usually fine, but it is a really awkward guitar to sit down and play because of it's thinness and lack of balance.

And don't forget - Les' right elbow was fused in a 90 degree bend due to a car crash. That may have complicated matters in terms of neck diving.

- D
 

jackal

Friend of Leo's
Joined
Jun 14, 2010
Posts
2,881
Location
mojave desert
And I think part of the reason is that they totally changed the guitar without asking for his input or approval, then had the nerve to put his name on it.
 

Satchmo

Tele-Meister
Joined
Jun 20, 2007
Posts
152
Location
Arizona
The divorce was a big factor. Also, Les didn't like the design of the SG. He said, "... a guy could get killed on those horns" and he didn't like the pickup being moved away from the fretboard.
 

Torz Johnson

Friend of Leo's
Joined
Jun 9, 2003
Posts
2,193
Location
NY
I just read about this in an interview he did back in '86. Here's Les in his own words:

Les Paul said:
They put out an SG, a Les Paul guitar, and it wasn’t with my blessings at all. They put the pickup in the wrong place, they made the body too thin, you could pull on the neck and change keys, and a lot of things wrong with it. So I said, ‘Clean that one up a little bit, will ya, before you put my name on it?” So they took my name off it and continued to make it and it’s their Number One selling solid-body. Sure, it’s a cheap guitar and it’s not as good sounding as the others and it’s a double-cutaway, it’s a different thing, and it turned out that I shouldn’t have said what I said.
 

Lee Harvey

Banned
Joined
Mar 1, 2012
Posts
576
Location
Chicago
I think Epiphone ended up taking Les Paul's advice when the buit this.



images.jpeg

Thicker body

Thicker neck

Doesn't neck dive

No point horns
 

Lee Harvey

Banned
Joined
Mar 1, 2012
Posts
576
Location
Chicago
Well the OP was talking about Les Paul, not you.

So in the context of the thread, the Epiphone Genesis did fix the issues Les Paul did not like.
 
Top