what's your oppinion about jim lill ? He shows that most of the hearable difference between amps come from the tone stack and cab

Pat_rocks92

Tele-Meister
Joined
Apr 25, 2022
Posts
287
Age
31
Location
Switzerland
I just saw this video and i must admit that many things he said i tested them in real life and got the same result.

I had an expensive amp with tube and ss rectifier and the difference in playing feel and tone was almost none.



the part that shocked me the most was when he compared 6v6 and el84 and the tone was almost exactly the same.

do you think that his methology is dubious ?

and where his statements deserve more testing ?
 

Old Verle Miller

Tele-Meister
Joined
Apr 7, 2022
Posts
411
Location
Texas
I have mentioned this in a post before - most human beings are not equipped to accurately compare and thus evaluate sounds they hear sequentially.
A somewhat more accurate methodology involves recording and then hearing the two "different" signals/sounds separated in two ears at the same time.
Even then, any minor differences may not even be discernable (not everyone hears equally in both ears).
To be scientifically viable, it would have to be repeated across a fairly large test population.
Everything else is just gut feel.
Your mileage may vary.
 

Phrygian77

Poster Extraordinaire
Gold Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2016
Posts
6,926
Location
Crawfordville, FL
While watching his speaker cab video, I mostly distracted by the visuals and the absurd pace of it. Kind of reminded me of something out of a Wes Anderson film.

The thing is, aside from tone, he doesn't get into the other reasons why you probably don't want a speaker cabinet made out of OSB, or anything else not strictly tone related.
 

zook

Friend of Leo's
Joined
Aug 6, 2003
Posts
3,013
Location
Cochise, AZ
If it's on the internet it must be true :(

I haven't listened to the video, but there are many folks there who think they are the gospel of information..

The concept that is presented is not true.
 

tubedude

Tele-Afflicted
Joined
Jul 26, 2013
Posts
1,772
Location
east georgia
The same way you "measure" happiness. There's no objective scale, and it's different for everyone.
But when you've played enough amps you'll know it.
It's how the amp responds to your playing at a certain level. It "gives in" a little to your attack, responding non-linearly, some say "spongy".
It's where dynamics in your signal drive the amps distortion combined with compression. Some designs do this well and some just don't. The transition is mainly dependent on the power supply's design. The dynamic area where sag and distortion come together and transition over a small but workable range. You'll know it when you feel it. But as far as measurements...what's the flavor of clouds. Not everything can be measured. And not every measurement has meaning.
 

printer2

Poster Extraordinaire
Joined
May 24, 2010
Posts
9,588
Location
Canada
I agree that the circuit determines the sound than the parts, be that EL 84 or 6V6. He does a world wind tour of amp circuits. Just like taking in all of Rome in a day as a tourist. Some of what he says is valid, some dot so much. I have not seen the video in a while, there was a couple of threads on it before.
 
Last edited:

David Barnett

Doctor of Teleocity
Ad Free Member
Joined
Mar 17, 2003
Posts
19,220
Age
66
Location
The Far-Flung Isles of Langerhans
Same guy has another video where he concludes that the sound of a real amp in a room is irrelevant, that the classic tones all guitarists are chasing are the sound of a recording of an amplifier with a microphone in a room, that has been post-processed and mastered.

I find his logic, uh, lacking.
 

bottlenecker

Poster Extraordinaire
Joined
Dec 6, 2015
Posts
7,870
Location
Wisconsin
the classic tones all guitarists are chasing

He does seem to believe in some kind of objectively "good" tone. Maybe for him there is; whatever gets him paid. I think he's chasing some kind of working method (and clicks) that will make the job simpler for him.
Thank golly all guitarists aren't chasing the same sounds, because I'm bored out of my skull by most of them as it is.
 

generic202

Tele-Meister
Joined
Feb 16, 2022
Posts
261
Location
Earth
I admire his effort and I agree and disagree on a few points.

At the end of the day, it's just one person's observation based on a loose experiment. Even if you think his methods are sound scientific research, then it's just a sample size of 1. Not enough data to make any conclusions.
 

Pat_rocks92

Tele-Meister
Joined
Apr 25, 2022
Posts
287
Age
31
Location
Switzerland
I admire his effort and I agree and disagree on a few points.

At the end of the day, it's just one person's observation based on a loose experiment. Even if you think his methods are sound scientific research, then it's just a sample size of 1. Not enough data to make any conclusions.
it's true that the sample of amps was too small.

i would have liked to see a soldano and a josé in the mix as those are hot rods differences might be way more observable.
 

TunedupFlat

Tele-Holic
Silver Supporter
Joined
May 17, 2022
Posts
624
Age
43
Location
Alberta
I found his clickbait video sadly lacking.

Let's take one part of an amp at a time and make conclusions based on only that one part.

I get how he needed to do something to earn an income with Nashville being shut down at the time, but I just found his approach distasteful and his conclusions half cocked.

If he just would have made the point that as long as it produces a musical sound it doesn't really matter what you are using, I might have been less annoyed...
 




New Posts

Top