... basically I think all of these terms like "creamy" are useless. I prefer more basic descriptions ... like "it sounds good" or "it sounds bad". I think players do better when they use terms like "practice" or "read music". Tone is subjective and you can experiment until you find a tone you think is "creamy" or "crunchy" or "compressed". MY advice learn how to play first and find your own sound. I have tried hundreds of amp/guitar combinations in the last 56 years and have found it usually comes down to the player. I don't know maybe the world passed me by. You could have the "creamiest" or "crunchiest" sounding amp on the face of the earth and a marginal player will still make it sound like crap. Rant over.
I respectfully disagree. In a written format such as this forum, descriptive terms are needed to communicate. As mentioned a few times in this thread are references to Santana's sound as being "creamy". This is one of the sounds I have chased for years and I find that it does take gear as well as technique to approach his tones. Sure, it will be my tone, but using his as a reference and inspiration is a good thing. Right here on this forum years back, someone recommended a modification (designed by a pedal maker on this forum) to a DS-1 to get Santana's sound. The mod made the DS-1 creamier. I don't know how better to describe it and has nothing to do with how good I play guitar.