Tremolo questions

mountainhick

Tele-Afflicted
Joined
May 2, 2021
Posts
1,076
Location
Rocky Mountains
On my latest builds I used an LED on the cathode and it helped give it a much deeper trem. On the beating side of things, lead dress is still important. In one of these amps if the B side of the reverb recovery was too close to the wires / terminals of the trem circuit it I could hear a faint beating/ticking.

Thank you! You have so many threads/posts, can you link me to the final schematic?
 

King Fan

Doctor of Teleocity
Ad Free Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2013
Posts
10,146
Location
Salt Lake City
Want TMI? If you missed it, here's my whole thread about this; lotsa comments, diagrams, and some follow-up.

 

mountainhick

Tele-Afflicted
Joined
May 2, 2021
Posts
1,076
Location
Rocky Mountains
Want TMI? If you missed it, here's my whole thread about this; lotsa comments, diagrams, and some follow-up.


I don't actually, but will have a look. Thanks!

The Merlin article is a different rendition of an oscillator than the Rick-tone circuit. And unfortunately it is not intuitive to me whether to connect from it's anode or cathode to another tube's cathode. It shows the LFO signal at the plate, but uncle doug circuit is coupled from the oscillator's cathode. The VC for example does use the anode output, but then also has a cathode follower after that to the target tube's bias. If the cathode output of the LFO itself is adequate, the single triode version is simpler.
 
Last edited:

King Fan

Doctor of Teleocity
Ad Free Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2013
Posts
10,146
Location
Salt Lake City
I don't actually, but will have a look. Thanks!

The Merlin article is a different rendition of an oscillator than the Rick-tone circuit. And unfortunately it is not intuitive to me whether to connect from it's anode or cathode to another tube's cathode. It shows the LFO signal at the plate, but uncle doug circuit and fender bias circuits are coupled from the oscillator's cathode.

Definitely don't take my word for it. I don't actually speak LFO, much less Rick-tone or Doug-tone. All I know is I was able to stick a simple red LED on my 6G2 cathode, and it worked, um, brilliantly. :)
 

mountainhick

Tele-Afflicted
Joined
May 2, 2021
Posts
1,076
Location
Rocky Mountains
No one has yet given me reason to not try the doug/ricktone approach, I find the use of a single triode for LFO with cathode coupling to its target appealing, so once I clean up the workbench. I'll try it.
 

mountainhick

Tele-Afflicted
Joined
May 2, 2021
Posts
1,076
Location
Rocky Mountains
Proposed Hicktone tremolo:

Hicktone.png
 

Phrygian77

Poster Extraordinaire
Gold Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2016
Posts
7,113
Location
Crawfordville, FL
Proposed Hicktone tremolo:

View attachment 1101497

Look at the schematic again. The plate load for the first triode is fed by the plate of the oscillator. In other words, the oscillator is oscillating the plate voltage of the gain stage.

I modeled just the oscillator alone and the speed range was around 4.7Hz to 10Hz. That's a bit on the fast side.
 

mountainhick

Tele-Afflicted
Joined
May 2, 2021
Posts
1,076
Location
Rocky Mountains
Look at the schematic again. The plate load for the first triode is fed by the plate of the oscillator. In other words, the oscillator is oscillating the plate voltage of the gain stage.

I modeled just the oscillator alone and the speed range was around 4.7Hz to 10Hz. That's a bit on the fast side.
I was wondering why it was configured that way. So then it is not the cathode connection alone that affects the gain stage. It is the combo. Thanks for doing the modeling! I thought uncle doug's demo all was pretty fast too. makes sense.

EDIT: frustration was speaking. Maybe I'll make the plate load coupling correction and keep going.

If I switch LFO cap/resistor/pot values to the same as a vibrochamp, should give same range for LFO frequency, no?
 
Last edited:

Phrygian77

Poster Extraordinaire
Gold Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2016
Posts
7,113
Location
Crawfordville, FL
Alright, you've given me good reason. I'll just step it up to a Vibro Champ style setup and upgrade the reverb circuit as well, 3 tubes/6 triodes for the works.

It might be worth trying to adjust the filters.

I think there is a potential for harmonic distortion from the oscillator to be seen/heard in the output from the gain stage. The reason for the smallish .015uF coupling cap, paired with the 500k pot, is to block the LFO from the plate. The F3 is around 19Hz .
 

mountainhick

Tele-Afflicted
Joined
May 2, 2021
Posts
1,076
Location
Rocky Mountains
It might be worth trying to adjust the filters.
Meaning for LFO frequency?


I think there is a potential for harmonic distortion from the oscillator to be seen/heard in the output from the gain stage. The reason for the smallish .015uF coupling cap, paired with the 500k pot, is to block the LFO from the plate. The F3 is around 19Hz .

I'd prefer to have input control for signal strength, so that 500K pot isn't needed as such. So maybe a multi stage filter a la Gibson? What would provide the most attenuation of LFO frequency without robbing audio signal?
 

mountainhick

Tele-Afflicted
Joined
May 2, 2021
Posts
1,076
Location
Rocky Mountains
I'd prefer to have input control for signal strength, so that 500K pot isn't needed as such. So maybe a multi stage filter a la Gibson? What would provide the most attenuation of LFO frequency without robbing audio signal?

Hmm, the filter on the dominator .01uf/500K, has the same cutoff 31hz as the Gibson GA-40, .005uf/1M but the gibson does stack 5 filters in series. Steeper order? 5 in a row seems a lot!

The rick tone uses .015 so lower cutoff at 21hz
 

mountainhick

Tele-Afflicted
Joined
May 2, 2021
Posts
1,076
Location
Rocky Mountains
Help please!

Question about grounding: (Ground points numbered at the bottom of the drawing)

Because of the physical constraints adding the trem into the same chassis as a reverb circuit without entirely gutting and re-laying out both circuits together, the grounding layout isn't physically in sequence. I am concerned about introducing ground loop hum with things misordered compared what I usually do

Easier options:

1: Group the grounds from the depth pot #11, footswitch #10 and speed pot #8 and ground to chassis.

2: footswitch jack grounded to chassis, and the two pots grounded together with a wire to point #7.

3: Edit/Addendum : footswitch to chassis, group 11 and 12, group all the rest close to being a star point.

Are these bad ideas?



dom-schematic.jpg

3:
 
Last edited:

mountainhick

Tele-Afflicted
Joined
May 2, 2021
Posts
1,076
Location
Rocky Mountains
I think option #3 might be OK:

If anyone understands what I am trying to show, please advise.

Here are the connections shown on the schematic. The actual layout is more convoluted to follow being point to point:

dom grounding scheme-1.jpg


And just the ground wire layout:

dom grounding scheme-2.jpg
 

mountainhick

Tele-Afflicted
Joined
May 2, 2021
Posts
1,076
Location
Rocky Mountains
Hot damn! It works!!! It sounds really nice with my "Bobcat". Has some nice extra gain available in the first stage, and a reasonable amount of reverb and trem. The trem can get pretty deep, (does have a 5K pot on it) and seems a usable speed range.

I am getting an additional oscillation with reverb level turned way up. Not sure what's going on there, but I don't need to turn it up that high. Could that extra gain stage driving the reverb driver cause an oscillation? It is nowhere near the low frequency of the LFO, so I don't think there' an interaction there.

I need to spend time with it and see whether tweaks will be desired. I will need to reverse wire the depth pot, as it is opposite rotation, clockwise turns down the depth. I might up the value to 3 meg on the speed pot to get some more range.

There is some hum/noise, but everything is wide open.

I'll post the current schematic for the whole unit soon.
 
Last edited:
Top