Tone King Imperial mkii vs Princeton 64 custom

  • Thread starter Sinner1980
  • Start date
  • This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links like Ebay, Amazon, and others.

Sinner1980

Tele-Meister
Joined
Dec 11, 2011
Posts
483
Location
The Netherlands
Hi All,

I’ve decided that I want to invest in a new amp. This time I want to go boutique/custom/handwired/fancy/expensive;)

I’m looking at the Tone King Imperial mkii and the Fender Princeton 64 (custom shop) initially.

Was wondering if there’s anyone that has experience with one of these amps or both(even better!) and if you can share your experiences.

I exclusively play teles and strats and want a great clean sound that can also break up nicely. It also has to take pedals well.

Style: classic rock, blues, indie
Usage: 80% home

Will test both personally of course, just curious to hear your opinions!

Thanks!
 

Wally

Telefied
Ad Free Member
Joined
Mar 17, 2003
Posts
46,337
Location
Lubbock, TX
No debate for me....the TK Imperial MKII is much more amp for my purposes. It has a 5E3 preamp in the left channel and a BF AB763 preamp on the right. The attenuator, which is great one imho, is assignable to only the 5E3 channel if desired. The versatility far outstrips that Fender amp. The tube reverb circuit is wonderful. The Bias vary trem is in the solid state domain, but that circuit does not process signal anyway but rather simply wiggles the output tube bias voltage for the effect.
 

Jakedog

Telefied
Ad Free Member
Joined
Mar 26, 2003
Posts
28,993
Location
The North Coast
No debate for me....the TK Imperial MKII is much more amp for my purposes. It has a 5E3 preamp in the left channel and a BF AB763 preamp on the right. The attenuator, which is great one imho, is assignable to only the 5E3 channel if desired. The versatility far outstrips that Fender amp. The tube reverb circuit is wonderful. The Bias vary trem is in the solid state domain, but that circuit does not process signal anyway but rather simply wiggles the output tube bias voltage for the effect.


Wally knows of which he speaks. I’m not really a fan of Fender amp voicings generally, but to me it would be no contest. I haven’t played the Princeton in question. I’ve never played a Princeton newer than ‘69... and my favorites were the non-reverb models. Especially the Brown ones.

But the couple of Imperials I’ve played were incredible amps for anybody who enjoys Fender type voicings and wants FAR more options and versatility. And really, being that the Brown models are my favorite of all the Fender amps, I can say without reservation that a good bias vary trem is definitely a thing of beauty.
 

pedalcr8z

Tele-Meister
Joined
Feb 16, 2007
Posts
476
Location
Denver, Colorado
I owned both, the Tone King is simply in another league as it's basically 2 different amplifiers and sorry to say but the build quality and parts of the handwired Fenders is sub par for the price. Also owned 2 Vibro Kings and quite honestly the guts were literally a rats nest....HOWEVER the Vibro King's tone was to die for. Dr Z nailed the tone with the EZG-50!
 
Last edited:

theprofessor

Poster Extraordinaire
Joined
Aug 8, 2016
Posts
6,135
Location
Chattanooga, TN
I love Princeton Reverbs. I just finished building a PR clone, and I honestly cannot imagine a better sounding amp for me. All that said, the Tone King Mk II is in a different class altogether in terms of versatility. Not only tone-wise, but also considering it has an Iron Man II attenuator -- Tone King for sure.
 

Sinner1980

Tele-Meister
Joined
Dec 11, 2011
Posts
483
Location
The Netherlands
I owned both, the Tone King is simply in another league as it's basically 2 different amplifiers and sorry to say but the build quality and parts of the handwired Fenders is sub par for the price. Also owned 2 Vibro Kings and quite honestly the guts were literally a rats nest....HOWEVER the Vibro King's tone was to die for. Dr Z nailed the tone with the EZG-50!

So you sold all and got the Dr Z?
 

EspyHop

Tele-Holic
Joined
May 28, 2018
Posts
835
Age
51
Location
Dayton, OH
Dr. Z Z-Lux might be worth a look. It’s 40/20 watts and has a master volume. It can do what you’re looking for and more in 20 watt mode and gives you the flexibility of having more power on tap if you need it.
 

pedalcr8z

Tele-Meister
Joined
Feb 16, 2007
Posts
476
Location
Denver, Colorado
After the Vibro Kings yes I indeed went to the Dr Z EZG-50 and it was basically a Vibro King on steroids HOWEVER it was far too loud for home use you wanted some form of breakup.
 

Whoa Tele

Friend of Leo's
Joined
Mar 20, 2009
Posts
2,985
Location
Smyrna Ga.
I've not played either of the amps you're considering but if it's allowed I'd throw the Louis Electric Deltone into the mix if you're looking for versatile Fender typeamp.
 

Wally

Telefied
Ad Free Member
Joined
Mar 17, 2003
Posts
46,337
Location
Lubbock, TX
I've not played either of the amps you're considering but if it's allowed I'd throw the Louis Electric Deltone into the mix if you're looking for versatile Fender typeamp.

That Deltone does offer a power option, but the two preamps are basically BF preamps...very much like each other but for the effects in one channel....very much like a Deluxe Reverb with a higher power option. I might choose the Deltone over the Fender ‘64 Handwired, but the MKII offers much more versatility since it has two distinctly different preamps as well as that assignable onboard attenuator that is a great attenuator, imho.
 

Fiesta Red

Doctor of Teleocity
Joined
Nov 15, 2010
Posts
13,991
Location
Texas
I’m a Fender amp fan. Most of my amps over the years—including my #1/don’t-see-it-being-replaced ‘63 re-issue Vibroverb—are/were Fenders...but...

I’ve played several models of Tone King amps—different wattages, sizes, etc.—and all of them were spectacular...
Each of them that I’ve played made me seriously consider culling the herd/guitarsenal and investing in one of them...they were that good.

If I were to ever buy an expensive boutique amp, a Tone King would definitely be considered (along with a Grammatico, a Dr. Z and a Carr).

The Tone King is a far superior amp, but as far as resale, the Fender name goes a long way. :cool:
All the used Tone King amps I’ve seen have been fairly pricey—I think (at least in my area) they hold their resale value very well.
 

SnidelyWhiplash

Poster Extraordinaire
Joined
Jun 18, 2009
Posts
7,647
Location
Hoggtown, KY.
Perhaps, but I still see far superior amps on the gear forums languish & Fender, Marshall, Vox, etc. sell based on name recognition alone. :cool:
 

Whoa Tele

Friend of Leo's
Joined
Mar 20, 2009
Posts
2,985
Location
Smyrna Ga.
That Deltone does offer a power option, but the two preamps are basically BF preamps...very much like each other but for the effects in one channel....very much like a Deluxe Reverb with a higher power option. I might choose the Deltone over the Fender ‘64 Handwired, but the MKII offers much more versatility since it has two distinctly different preamps as well as that assignable onboard attenuator that is a great attenuator, imho.

I would definitely agree with your observations Wally. The Tone King is remarkable in that it can give you two flavors of Fender. I will say however , that the mid knob on the Deltone adds a lot of variety to my ears and can give faux tweediness depending on how you EQ the amp. The OP does want something that will break up nicely so the TOne King makes more sense as the Deltone gets pretty dang loud before it breaks up.
 
Top