three hole versus four hole bridge mounting specs

  • Thread starter Voodoo Tremolo
  • Start date
  • This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links like Ebay, Amazon, and others.

Voodoo Tremolo

Tele-Meister
Joined
Mar 23, 2022
Posts
137
Location
North
I know this topic has been covered many times. I did search the site and reviewed a lot of related threads but did not find one that answers a simple straight forward question:

Do the outer two holes of the three hole modern bridge align with the outer two holes of the four hole vintage bridge?

It looks like they do in this hole drilling guide attached but nothing beats personal experience from you folks who know first hand.

Happy Saturday everyone.

+ edited title which was wrong (said strings not holes)
 

Attachments

  • il_fullxfull.744113054_7yaw.jpg
    il_fullxfull.744113054_7yaw.jpg
    116.3 KB · Views: 170
Last edited:

Voodoo Tremolo

Tele-Meister
Joined
Mar 23, 2022
Posts
137
Location
North
The spacing of the outer screw holes is similar, but the relationship between the screw holes and string holes is very different.
Got ya. The screw holes/string holes are closer together on the three hole bridge so there are other spacing incompatibilities to deal with. It's not as simple as I hoped. Thanks for the reply.
 

Tuxedo Poly

Friend of Leo's
Joined
Dec 19, 2011
Posts
2,727
Location
Merseyside UK
The bridge drilling guide above is dual purpose.
Three hole for Fender American Standard/Series/Deluxe/Elite/Ultra bridges and four hole for vintage style bridges.
There is a relatively new kid on the block which is the American Professional four screw fixing bridge which has the same relationship between the bridge pickup and the through body holes as the three hole.

This line drawing of the different types may help.
Bridge_Compare_Fender_Am_Pro_Am_Dlx_Vintage.jpg
 

Voodoo Tremolo

Tele-Meister
Joined
Mar 23, 2022
Posts
137
Location
North
Thanks. Yes, that's helpful. I now see the top/bottom placement is also reversed on the vintage bridge.

I understood the drilling guide was for both - just posted it for comparing alignment of the outer mounting screw holes.

Is there a vintage bridge that doesn't have the raised lip around the outside?

Otherwise, looks like I'm getting this fella here:
 

Attachments

  • vinateg bridge.jpg
    vinateg bridge.jpg
    107.1 KB · Views: 110

AAT65

Doctor of Teleocity
Joined
May 29, 2016
Posts
10,008
Location
Edinburgh, Scotland
More info here:

Bridge-Over-Troubled-Telecaster-Small.jpg
That picture really needs updated to use a better datum - if possible I would take the saddles as a common reference, since that’s what is actually set by the guitar geometry for good intonation, but since they are moveable that’s not so convenient!
On my AO’60s (traditional) and Elite (modern) the distance from saddle to front edge of the bridge plate is pretty much the same while the Elite string-through holes have moved forward about 4mm, giving a sharper break angle over the saddle.
I think the pictures would be more informative lined up on the front edge of the bridge plate, not on the string-through holes.
(I think you’d then see that the bridge pickup routs are in fact in the same position.)
 

yegbert

Poster Extraordinaire
Joined
Sep 28, 2004
Posts
9,290
Location
Maryland
The bridge drilling guide above is dual purpose.
Three hole for Fender American Standard/Series/Deluxe/Elite/Ultra bridges and four hole for vintage style bridges.
There is a relatively new kid on the block which is the American Professional four screw fixing bridge which has the same relationship between the bridge pickup and the through body holes as the three hole.

This line drawing of the different types may help.
View attachment 1045766
Both the Am Std (middle) and the Pro (left) have mounting screw holes that are closer to the bottom of the Tele, than the vintage pattern. Their string through holes are at least approximately like each other, but closer to the top of the Tele, than vintage.

Squier Standards (possibly other Squiers) also had 3 screw holes down at the bottom, but even farther down than the Am Std.

Squier Standard bridgeplates had string through holes that were almost the same as Am Std, and their body STB holes were large enough that I have been able to use bridgeplates made for the Am Std on my Squier Standard Teles.
 

yegbert

Poster Extraordinaire
Joined
Sep 28, 2004
Posts
9,290
Location
Maryland
That picture really needs updated to use a better datum - if possible I would take the saddles as a common reference, since that’s what is actually set by the guitar geometry for good intonation, but since they are moveable that’s not so convenient!
On my AO’60s (traditional) and Elite (modern) the distance from saddle to front edge of the bridge plate is pretty much the same while the Elite string-through holes have moved forward about 4mm, giving a sharper break angle over the saddle.
I think the pictures would be more informative lined up on the front edge of the bridge plate, not on the string-through holes.
(I think you’d then see that the bridge pickup routs are in fact in the same position.)
That is why I like to use the pickup’s three screw holes as the common point. Like Tuxedo Poly’s diagram.
 

Peegoo

Telefied
Ad Free Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2019
Posts
31,576
Location
Beast of Bourbon
That picture really needs updated to use a better datum - if possible I would take the saddles as a common reference, since that’s what is actually set by the guitar geometry for good intonation, but since they are moveable that’s not so convenient!
On my AO’60s (traditional) and Elite (modern) the distance from saddle to front edge of the bridge plate is pretty much the same while the Elite string-through holes have moved forward about 4mm, giving a sharper break angle over the saddle.
I think the pictures would be more informative lined up on the front edge of the bridge plate, not on the string-through holes.
(I think you’d then see that the bridge pickup routs are in fact in the same position.)

I made up that diagram years ago for a discussion on the difference between body string-through holes in the 'vintage' and 'modern' configurations. It is intended to show how the pickup rout of the modern style is closer to the through-holes, and why the bridges are not interchangeable.

If the builder is okay with top-loading either type of bridge, each type can easily be adapted to fit either body style.
 

gsh1968

Tele-Holic
Joined
Jun 16, 2008
Posts
986
Location
London UK
I made up that diagram years ago for a discussion on the difference between body string-through holes in the 'vintage' and 'modern' configurations. It is intended to show how the pickup rout of the modern style is closer to the through-holes, and why the bridges are not interchangeable.

If the builder is okay with top-loading either type of bridge, each type can easily be adapted to fit either body style.
However it confuses the issue because the string-through holes are aligned.
It would be better to align the pickup rout and reverse the terminology - the string through holes (which have "moved") are closer to the pickup rout (same position on vintage and modern bodies).
 

yegbert

Poster Extraordinaire
Joined
Sep 28, 2004
Posts
9,290
Location
Maryland
Thanks. Yes, that's helpful. I now see the top/bottom placement is also reversed on the vintage bridge.

I understood the drilling guide was for both - just posted it for comparing alignment of the outer mounting screw holes.

Is there a vintage bridge that doesn't have the raised lip around the outside?

Otherwise, looks like I'm getting this fella here:
There’s an eBay seller who cuts down the raised lip to minimal height; Callaham, Glendale and Hipshot sell pricey flat ones; or you can drill the holes yourself (or have them drilled) in an older MiM standard or a Gotoh (flat ones that fit vintage).
 

Rhomco

Friend of Leo's
Silver Supporter
Joined
Oct 8, 2004
Posts
2,730
Location
DFW, Texas
Amazon has a cut down Wilkerson with nice looking saddles for $22.
Good luck with your project,
Rob
 
Top