Those Gibson Robot Tuners, yay or nay?

  • Thread starter Blazer
  • Start date
  • This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links like Ebay, Amazon, and others.

Blazer

Doctor of Teleocity
Ad Free Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2003
Posts
18,600
Age
49
Location
The Netherlands
X-rated.jpg

Yeah, there's this basket case Les Paul coming my way with Robot tuners, it also has several...erm...disastrous mods to its body.

But I wonder, those Robot tuners, do they have advantages to them? I mean, Les Pauls are notoriously difficult to keep in tune, so I imagine they'd be practical in that aspect.

So people who own Gibsons with Robot tuners, what are your opinions on them?
 

Dan German

Doctor of Teleocity
Ad Free Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2008
Posts
16,805
Age
65
Location
Left of the Left Coast
By ”disastrous mods” you wouldn’t be referring to the Swiss cheese effect to the body, would you?

As for the robot tuners, I have never seen them in real life. If I bought a guitar that had them, I wouldn’t replace them unless they caused problems. On the other hand, I wouldn’t buy a guitar because it had them…
 

LOSTVENTURE

Friend of Leo's
Joined
Feb 13, 2007
Posts
3,221
Location
Charlotte, NC
2015 was the year that Gibson introduced those. I had a LP Double Cut Special that had those tuners as well as the super wide "soloist" neck profile. Both terrible ideas. Had I kept the guitar, the tuners would have been gone pretty quickly. What Gibson did not tell you was that manual tuning was close to impossible, and setting intonation was a weekend task. That's if you had the patience.
So, Nay for me.
 

Blazer

Doctor of Teleocity
Ad Free Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2003
Posts
18,600
Age
49
Location
The Netherlands
By ”disastrous mods” you wouldn’t be referring to the Swiss cheese effect to the body, would you?

As for the robot tuners, I have never seen them in real life. If I bought a guitar that had them, I wouldn’t replace them unless they caused problems. On the other hand, I wouldn’t buy a guitar because it had them…
They are LED Lights drilled through the body. The previous owner has chopped up the back to install the circuitry.
 
Joined
Mar 12, 2016
Posts
933
Location
San Antonio
I have a lp special dc and a sg special from 2015 and have kept the robot tuners. The tuners work fine for me.

It is true that manual tuning with them is aweful and not suggested (except if you’re try to make a tuning that isn’t included that you want to save).

I have found that I don’t change tunings as much as I thought I might. So I wouldn’t purchase them again new but they aren’t worth changing either.

You should play with them. They’re fun enough. READ THE MANUAL. They are pretty confusing without it.
 

gridlock

Poster Extraordinaire
Joined
Oct 1, 2011
Posts
7,367
Location
Tampa, Fl
Nay, I owned two 2015 LP Special’s and I almost immediately changed them out with Klusons.
 
Last edited:

Mekhem

Tele-Afflicted
Joined
Oct 31, 2010
Posts
1,356
Location
Minneapolis
Eh - They took a lot of dinking around to figure out BUT... If you want to mess with tunings quickly - they are very convenient
 

Dufffy1111

TDPRI Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2022
Posts
40
Age
75
Location
Glens Falls
I hated the robot tuners that were stock on my brand new gibson lp junior. I had them removed and new rotogrip grover locking tuners installed. These are smooth and accurate easy turning tuning machines.

In my opinion the Gibson robot tuners are junk, similar to the junk unserviceable pcb board electronic systems that you will find on some Gibsons, amazingly. Some people enjoy these products, but I find them to be distracting, of questionable value, and it is expensive to replace such items.
 

G3Hanz

Tele-Meister
Joined
Apr 19, 2020
Posts
112
Location
Emmm..
Never tried them and i see these tuners often pop up on Marktplaats (local auction site) without a guitar :) However it might be cool to experiment with them if they respond quickly enough to change the tuning in the middle of a song?

Shame about the LED-crosses, the colour of that guitar is really nice!
 

fenderchamp

Poster Extraordinaire
Ad Free Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2008
Posts
5,644
Location
omaha
I think the problem is that somehow Gibson alienated the maker of those to a degree that the maker quit supplying the batteries for them so once they are dead they are dead.

I might be misinformed but I believe that to be the case.


it's not nearly as bad as getting stuck with bricked bionic eyes though. I can't quite get over that idea

https://spectrum.ieee.org/bionic-eye-obsolete
 

tonyguitargoat

Tele-Meister
Joined
Sep 3, 2003
Posts
170
Les Pauls 'notoriously difficult to keep in tune'? Players have been using them for over seventy years. And robot tuners? If you can't tune a Les Paul you don't deserve to have one!
 

uriah1

Telefied
Ad Free Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2011
Posts
33,493
Location
Around
I thought they discontinued those since players were getting corrections during note bends
and the tuner would occassionally take off and break a string.
 

gimmeatele

Friend of Leo's
Silver Supporter
Joined
Jun 5, 2014
Posts
4,605
Age
65
Location
Alora Spain
As per lost ventures post, I have same guitar, robot tuners were off within two weeks, just useless
 

bendercaster

Friend of Leo's
Joined
Sep 20, 2011
Posts
2,230
Location
Sacramento
I thought they discontinued those since players were getting corrections during note bends
and the tuner would occassionally take off and break a string.
Never heard that one. That's not exactly how they work though, so I can't see how they would correct note bends.

I have them on a 2015 Les Paul Jr. It is probably my best sounding guitar, unfortunately it is kind of heavy and the wide thin neck feels weird to me.

The zero nut is great though. And I found the tuners really helpful on a gig. Push a button and stum and everything pulls back in in tune. I tended to use the mode where you pluck each individual string because it was.more accurate. Everytime I change strings I have to reacquaint myself with the system. It uses locking tuners, which are nice, but it's a couple a button clicks to unwind and wind back up. Manual winding doesn't feel great or do much.
 

oldunc

Poster Extraordinaire
Joined
Jan 31, 2014
Posts
6,061
Age
75
Location
California
No,no, a thousand times no. I actually bought one of those things- the tuners work pretty well when they work- its pretty entertaining in its way- but are incredibly flimsy and undependable in manual mode. And when they're not working, you can't change strings. I took them off and replaced with some Grover Deluxe and, after replacing the input jack, it's a nice guitar. I like the zero nut; the neck width honestly makes no difference to me.
 

Hammer of Donuts

TDPRI Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2023
Posts
13
Age
68
Location
Massachusetts
Have a relative that has those on an SG. I don't like it one bit. I'm also a Luddite. We passed it around one holiday and like a previous poster mentioned, one of us popped a string. I wouldn't trust it on a gig. I'm also only a recent convert to those clip on tuners. Now those I like. Around the house a robot might be fun if you want to do a lot of different tunings on the fly. If you don't know how to tune...it'll wind up under your bed like so many '50's Stratocasters that hit the market practically brand new.
 
Top