jz63
Tele-Holic
This is my CIJ 62. Great guitar upgraded with AV64 pups. The poly (urethane?) finish seems quite thin compared to MIM or USA poly. Anyone else notice this?
This^^^^Buyer beware though, as the article mentions the electronics in CIJ Fenders are total garbage. Squier Affinity level or worse. Pots, pickups, switches, wiring, all of it. I picked up a CIJ Jaguar bass on the cheap because the the wiring was so screwed up it needed a complete overhaul and the active preamp was so noisy to be totally unusable. It was a PITA to fix, but once I did it was a cool bass.
Overall, I'd rank the upper tier MIMs as better guitars.
Buyer beware though, as the article mentions the electronics in CIJ Fenders are total garbage. Squier Affinity level or worse. Pots, pickups, switches, wiring, all of it. I picked up a CIJ Jaguar bass on the cheap because the the wiring was so screwed up it needed a complete overhaul and the active preamp was so noisy to be totally unusable. It was a PITA to fix, but once I did it was a cool bass.
Overall, I'd rank the upper tier MIMs as better guitars.
Yep and double yep.I’ve played quite a few MIJ/CIJ Fender guitars.
-99% of them had great fit and finish.
-75-80% had a great feel (a few of them had necks that were too narrow for my personal taste).
-Most of them had very “meh” generic and uninspiring sound…I’m glad the article mentioned this—hopefully it’ll get Fender to make Fender-Japan put better pickups in their instruments.
If I were able to score a good looking, good playing, affordable MIJ/CIJ Fender I wouldn’t have a problem replacing the pickups, switches and pots…but if the neck needed to be replaced as well, I probably wouldn’t go to that much trouble—especially since (as mentioned in the article) some people put a pretty high premium on these instruments.