I am sure I could fix this with a little practice but the bigger problem is even after the top coat the paint seems dull. The body on top is the acrylic mid coat. The bottom is finished in nitro.
Does it just look dull or is there some cloudiness - or is that just a photo artifact?
I used a cheap Harbor Freight HVLP spray gun set to the max pressure and did a wet coat.
????
Are you using a compressor or a true HVLP turbine?
If the former, those guns do not usually operate well at high pressure. I'd switch to a conventional gun if you are shooting with a compressor at anything over 25-30psi. The HVLP needle or conventional air cap/needle combination also make a big difference. You have to change the setup or the viscosity - running a heavier-bodied product and thinner product with the same orifice will make one or the other hard to control and give you an inconsistent fan pattern.
That gun is very inconsistent no matter what material/pressure, though. If you're serious about finishing I strongly suggest investing in a compact fully-triggered HVLP gun/hose/turbine setup. "Fully triggered" means the air is triggered with the material and does not continuously "bleed", like the cheapo $130 Harbor Freight/Rockler unit made by Earlex. With the correct (1mm) needle/air cap set for thinner materials (lacquers, shellacs) and whatever is recommended for each higher-viscosity material you spray at 4-10 psi but with te same material output as high pressure conventional spraying - except the material stays on the surface, with almost no overspray and no "bounce" (aka "high material transfer rate).
You get much better control (you can almost draw a line if you want) by varying the pressure, there's little masking, almost no cleanup and less than 10% material waste (you lose 50% or more with conventional spray).
Coatings also flow more smoothly. I haven't needed to "finish sand" a guitar sprayed by HVLP for at least 20 years - about a month after I started using one for my own work. Everything goes straight to the buffer - lacquers just a few hours after the last coat is applied.
I trained applicators in the use of both for decades before I retired, and considering good compact HVLP kits are now available NEW for less than $500 IMO they're the only logical choice. Among finishers I know, only a few with permanent spray booths are still using conventional rigs (mostly because they're built into the booth).
But regardless, I suggest avoiding all the Harbor Freight guns - I've checked parts with a micrometer and electronic microscope and they're very inconsistent.
Also, many of the needles are plain or plated brass - these and the caps wear very quickly, and if you don't remember to pull the trigger when adjusting either you usually groove the needle, which fouls your fan pattern. A quality conventional gun runs $100-200, which gives you some idea of the difference in quality - and quality control.
1. Long term compatibility with what is under it. What can I put under it.
One thing that should work is Mohawk grain filler. It can be thinned quite a bit and is both fully transparent when overcoated and tintable with stains, dyes and universal colorants.
I had no luck with uv light blubs/grow bulbs at all.
It generally takes a large array of UV bulbs to get consistent curing inside. Taylor uses a UV cure system and a guitar is suspended on a gimbel system, sprayed robotically in a special multi-head booth, and then moved by an overhead belt to an enclosed UV booth where an array hits it with UV light from all directions for about 15-20 seconds. Then a door slides open. the guitar is transported to an operator who removes it and hands it off to the buffers.
But you can't get a good cure using a single or even several UV bulbs of any kind. DIY UV cure on a guitar requires direct sunlight exposure for proper curing.