soulgeezer
Poster Extraordinaire
He wasn't in Unforgiven, either. I think TD's point was about the way we view actors who play heroes, not a list of Tom Selleck Westerns.
My definitely not stupid or destitute in-laws did a RM and have been very happy with it. I'm not as happy about not someday sharing in the inherited proceeds from their previously paid-off home...but hey.
And why does Sellleck get all the grief, what about Fonzie?![]()
Yes, I lost respect for Tom when started trying to sell reverse mortgages. I know exactly what they are. I liked his work, but now I have lost respect for him.
I'm thinking that you can't be that hard up for money to be a paid shill for reverse mortgages.
All this "but I did some checking" is bs. You have no need to check out reverse mortgages or find a "fourth leg of retirement income".
I am certain that some folks benefit from a reverse mortgage as a last resort. However, I think some are scammed into this being a panacea without fully understanding what it really entails.
Regardless, I've never thought much of you Tom but now I think even less. Same goes to any of the celebs who hawk predatory lenders like Montel.
Celebrity endorsements are what they are. A celebrity endorsement has never weighed in on any decision I have ever made as a consumer.
But I do have to say when someone singles out one celebrity out of the 1000s that do it, I just wonder is there an ulterior motive for the singling out....
Commercials are just commercials to make those paying for the product/service money. I don't believe one thing that's said... ever... just mind numbing at times though.
He's an actor. It's a job. Any questions?
He's an actor. It's a job. Any questions?
Here's 25000 dollars so you can live in this house till you die just give us the 350,000 dollar house after you croak.
It's just an atrocity when celebrities do stuff like this.
A product that's good or you believe in or something fun. More power to them. I wish someone would pay me for that.
I think you are over simplifying it somewhat to benefit your side.
You know, I don't think Tom Selleck reads this forum.
To some extent perhaps. I think the new rules only allow you to get one half of the value of the property. The thing that no one ever mentions is that you are paying interest on that money which is deferred until you leave the house. Further, your heirs have to come up with cash or finance the balance to claim it. So, it's not exactly a slam dunk decision.
However, it may be the only way for some folks to make it and stay in their house additional years.
It's not a total sham or scam but it can have serious implications.
For the record, I don't care if Selleck hawks products I just find this one objectionable.
As for Fred Thompson, who someone mentioned. I thought the same of him.
I'm thinking that you can't be that hard up for money to be a paid shill for reverse mortgages.
All this "but I did some checking" is bs. You have no need to check out reverse mortgages or find a "fourth leg of retirement income".
I am certain that some folks benefit from a reverse mortgage as a last resort. However, I think some are scammed into this being a panacea without fully understanding what it really entails.
Regardless, I've never thought much of you Tom but now I think even less. Same goes to any of the celebs who hawk predatory lenders like Montel.