Poll: What is Your Preferred Tele Neck Profile?

Discussion in 'Telecaster Discussion Forum' started by El Tele Lobo, Nov 13, 2019.

What is your preferred Tele neck profile?

  1. Fat C

  2. Soft V

  3. 50s U

  4. 60s C

  5. Modern C

  6. Skinny

  7. Shape doesn't matter, but if I can't hit a home run with it, I've got no use for it

Results are only viewable after voting.
  1. El Tele Lobo

    El Tele Lobo Friend of Leo's

    Posts:
    4,429
    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2014
    Location:
    Florida
    Ordered a new neck recently. Was curious what you all prefer and how it matches up with my tastes...
     

    Attached Files:

  2. sonny wolf

    sonny wolf Friend of Leo's

    Age:
    47
    Posts:
    2,524
    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2009
    Location:
    austin texas
    I own guitars with various shapes ranging from slim to chunky and C,D,V and U neck shapes.I've reached the point where I can adapt to any one as long as the guitar inspires me.But I do have a preference for a large early 50s style U shaped Tele neck like on the 2012-2017 52 reissues so I voted U shape.I tried several of the new Vintera 50s Teles which are spec'd as early 50s U and those are heavenly...if Fender were to make me a signature Sonny Wolf model it would have that neck profile with those thick shoulders on the edges and round shape.
     
    mimmo and El Tele Lobo like this.
  3. felis

    felis Tele-Afflicted

    Posts:
    1,167
    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2011
    Location:
    Antwerp/Belgium
    V neck (not soft) with a rosewood fretboard.
     
  4. brookdalebill

    brookdalebill Tele Axpert Ad Free Member

    Age:
    62
    Posts:
    66,789
    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2009
    Location:
    Austin, Tx
    I like a big ol’ neck.
    50’s U or Fat C, por favor.
     
    nojazzhere and mimmo like this.
  5. wabashslim

    wabashslim Tele-Holic

    Age:
    68
    Posts:
    863
    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2005
    Location:
    Sonorous Desert
    I got a Warmoth '59 Roundback in 2015 that I'm about 90% in love with, so I ordered another several months ago and it's nowhere near the same. It feels much closer to a slightly fatter Standard Thin or even a hint of V. I called them and the guy explained every one is hand-shaped and different guys do it differently. I kept it and once I've played it for awhile the hand adapts.

    I really liked the feel of the Hot Rod Teles I played in the late 2000s.
     
    Sax-son and nojazzhere like this.
  6. mimmo

    mimmo Friend of Leo's

    Age:
    44
    Posts:
    3,474
    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2010
    Location:
    Paris France - Rome Italy
    50's U for me. I can adapt and enjoy the C profile of my 60s classic series, but my AV telecaster's neck is heaven to me.
     
    sonny wolf likes this.
  7. Mike Eskimo

    Mike Eskimo Doctor of Teleocity Ad Free Member

    Posts:
    19,776
    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2008
    Location:
    Detroit
    Necks ?

    There’s width and depth.

    Chunky, soft, modern, skinny - all mean nothing .

    or - they mean something different to everybody .

    “ I love fat necks ! Really fat ! Like GE Smith fat. But because I have insect hands I only want a neck that’s 1/2” wide. 1” deep, 1/2” wide - you know , fat !”
     
  8. holndav

    holndav Friend of Leo's

    Posts:
    2,105
    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2003
    Location:
    Northern Virginia
    Love the V neck Strat I have. Most of my Teles are C shape which is fine too.

    Not really sure it makes a major difference in my playing but I do sure like how the V feels.
     
    AndyPanda likes this.
  9. unixfish

    unixfish Poster Extraordinaire

    Posts:
    9,571
    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2013
    Location:
    Northeast Ohio, USA
    You would get a lot more hits if you titled this thread "What is the best neck profile?". :D Then we could fight non-stop.

    I like the soft-V on my Baja, with the 60's C / fatter C second.
     
    El Tele Lobo likes this.
  10. GK34

    GK34 Tele-Meister

    Posts:
    330
    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2010
    Location:
    Pearland, TX
    I used to prefer the big chunky necks (Baja, AV52), but during the last few years I prefer the modern C on the American Standard and Player Series. They’re easy.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
     
  11. gkterry

    gkterry Tele-Holic

    Posts:
    603
    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2014
    Location:
    the Telecaster Forest
    I voted soft V but it has to be beefy.
     
    Gene O. and El Tele Lobo like this.
  12. MilwMark

    MilwMark Doctor of Teleocity Ad Free Member

    Posts:
    10,344
    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2013
    Location:
    near Arnold's
    Shape is the second most important neck attribute for me. Never U or hard V. Preferred is 60s C. Slight V is ok. D is ok.

    Nut width is the most important spec for me. Need 1 11/16 or almost that.

    Depth isn't that important to me if it has those two things. Though baseball bats don't seem to work for me, despite big hands.
     
    El Tele Lobo likes this.
  13. Tommy Biggs

    Tommy Biggs Friend of Leo's

    Posts:
    2,154
    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2010
    Location:
    Northern NJ
    Mine. I like my old 78 Tele neck, whatever that is. Close to a medium c I’d guess.
    I’m ok with most, except thin or narrow.
     
    El Tele Lobo likes this.
  14. John E

    John E Tele-Afflicted

    Posts:
    1,819
    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2003
    Location:
    Connecticut
    I can't really answer, although I voted soft V. I know what I would order if I was ordering from USACG or Warmoth. Soft V definitely thick but not over the top, tapered from maybe .85-.95. 12" radius, 1-11/16 nut and Medium J - to Jumbo frets. And generally I prefer rosewood FB but not anything to do with tone, I just like the feel under my fingers.

    That said the profile (and other neck specs) will never make or break a guitar for me. There are so many varying neck styles that I have been able to fly on, wide thin, fat round, sharp v, etc etc etc. lol

    When I pick up a built guitar I generally know right away whether I will get along with it or not. And they come in all different shapes, sizes, scale lengths, and flavors. And I can never put my finger on exactly why, it's just how the whole thing came together.

    My current #1 tele is a BP silver sparkle. I love the neck on it... lol. But when I bought it I played two together... the one I bought I completely fell in love with and the other one was meh. Granted setup plays a huge part but both of these were set up pretty well,and the profiles were awfully close, if not exact.

    So what's my point? I don't know! lol

    I guess it's to say that I generally like a whole lot of different guitars and I don't (OK try not to) get hung up on the details anymore. A wise man named Rob DiStefano once told me, "A guitar is the sum of it's parts".
     
  15. gwjensen

    gwjensen Friend of Leo's

    Posts:
    2,930
    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2011
    Location:
    District of Chicanery
    Love the U on my Vintera 50s Tele. After all these years of playing modern Cs I finally discover the right neck shape...
     
    El Tele Lobo likes this.
  16. nojazzhere

    nojazzhere Poster Extraordinaire

    Age:
    67
    Posts:
    8,994
    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2017
    Location:
    Foat Wuth, Texas
    I had a similar experience. Three or four years ago, I ordered my "fatback" conversion neck from Warmoth, and I loved the full feel in my hand. It (supposedly) is 1" depth from nut to heel. I recently ordered another fatback, just like my first, only in maple instead of mahogany. When it came in, on a whim I put my calipers on it, and it measures .97" nut to heel....in other words, less than 1". I'm waiting to re-string my first to actually measure it, and see what it truly is. I'm keeping and playing the .97" one, but I'd rather they erred on the side of "more fat" than less. Honestly, I can't "feel" any difference between the two....maybe .03" is just too insignificant.
     
    El Tele Lobo likes this.
  17. Robert H.

    Robert H. Friend of Leo's

    Posts:
    2,714
    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2005
    Location:
    N. Cal.
    What's the difference between 60's C and Modern C?
     
  18. Fretting out

    Fretting out Tele-Afflicted

    Age:
    28
    Posts:
    1,343
    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2019
    Location:
    Land of Mary
    I have a 79-80 lead 2 and a 72 tele that have wonderful 70s u shapes both .88 at the first fret
    so I had to choose fat c because that’s the closest I guess

    70s U-shape should have been a choice! :(
     
    El Tele Lobo likes this.
  19. Fretting out

    Fretting out Tele-Afflicted

    Age:
    28
    Posts:
    1,343
    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2019
    Location:
    Land of Mary
    Modern C is a thin c I’d say commonly .79 - .82
    At the first fret
    And 60s C is almost chunky to a big medium
    If that makes sense- .82-.86
     
    El Tele Lobo likes this.
  20. dannyh

    dannyh Tele-Afflicted

    Age:
    53
    Posts:
    1,411
    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2005
    Location:
    North Texas
    I voted 60's C, but I can get along with anything as long as it's not TOO small. I've got guitars with all sorts, but if I had to pick one it'd prolly be my AV64 Tele neck. Whatever that falls under, I like a lot.
     
    El Tele Lobo likes this.
IMPORTANT: Treat everyone here with respect, no matter how difficult!
No sex, drug, political, religion or hate discussion permitted here.


  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.