Original Paisley & Blue Flower Tele Appreciation Thread

  • Thread starter Highnumbers
  • Start date
  • This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links like Ebay, Amazon, and others.

Highnumbers

TDPRI Member
Joined
May 11, 2009
Posts
56
Location
Orange County
Out of the many Telecaster variations, the original Paisley and Blue Flower models of 1968-1969 are some of my favorite.

On top of being spectacular players (like most late 60s Teles), I love the quirky story of these guitars - how Fender decided to capitalize on the psychedelic "Summer of Love" by putting the wildest possible finish on their most conservative model. No wonder they weren't popular at the time!

Consequently, these were only offered for about one year so they are sort of rare in the world of vintage Fenders.

I'm fortunate enough to own an example of each color, both '68 maple cap necks with plenty of wear.

If you have one of these guitars, share it here!
IMG_2999.jpg


IMG_3002.jpg
 

ChicknPickn

Poster Extraordinaire
Joined
Apr 16, 2007
Posts
9,549
Age
62
Location
Coastal Virginia
Out of the many Telecaster variations, the original Paisley and Blue Flower models of 1968-1969 are some of my favorite.

On top of being spectacular players (like most late 60s Teles), I love the quirky story of these guitars - how Fender decided to capitalize on the psychedelic "Summer of Love" by putting the wildest possible finish on their most conservative model. No wonder they weren't popular at the time!

Consequently, these were only offered for about one year so they are sort of rare in the world of vintage Fenders.

I'm fortunate enough to own an example of each color, both '68 maple cap necks with plenty of wear.

If you have one of these guitars, share it here!
View attachment 1028290

View attachment 1028291
Looks like a comfy rig. 👍
 

Highnumbers

TDPRI Member
Joined
May 11, 2009
Posts
56
Location
Orange County
The pink paisley above is pretty straightforward, just some fading of the pink to gold on front/back.

The blue flower is another story. This came from the original owner's son in the UK, apparently his dad owned it since the late 60s, and gigged it extensively in numerous Manchester-area bands. The neck is super worn (fretboard wear and the board edges were heavily rolled), yet surprisingly still on tired original frets.

The finish was lifting all over the front and back of the body, as these guitars are known to do. I could post a totally separate thread on this, but basically the adhesive between the Borden Cling-Foil and the body starts to give up and the finish lifts up from the wood. I remedied this by carefully injecting strong glue under all lifting areas of the finish and clamping the body between thick plexiglas. Works like a charm and the finish is securely on there now.

Hogy (Holger Notzel) refretted the neck perfectly and it plays great now.

IMG_3040.jpg


Like most exported guitars to the UK, it was sold new with a Selmer case.

Here's the guitar not long after it was purchased.
bhtgwaibn2w81.jpeg



Anyway, enough of my stuff. Please share if you have one of these guitars (or basses!)
 

Lefty McGuffin

TDPRI Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2012
Posts
81
Location
Bolingbrook Illinois
In 1974 I went with some friends to Ziegler’s music in Aurora IL. I was 17, my friends a little older. We bought some small items, stings and picks likely and a friend bought an import violin bass. The owner told of a paisley Tele he had upstairs. I was aware of them because of James Burton and was intrigued. He mentioned a price that I no longer recall but while I didn’t have cash with me I knew I could get it. He refused to even show us the guitar. I suppose he figured a high school kid wasn’t worthy. I no longer have any of the cool guitars of my youth except for my ‘73 D35 but I would still have that one if only….

I did pickup a MIJ blue flower a few years ago but still not the same.
 

slack

Friend of Leo's
Joined
Sep 26, 2003
Posts
3,357
Location
Los Angeles
If one is researching these, or searching this forum for posts by those of us who've owned them and discussed them in the past... I might politely point out that the model is technically called "Blue Floral." Even well-known vintage shops market them wrong. ;)
 

Highnumbers

TDPRI Member
Joined
May 11, 2009
Posts
56
Location
Orange County
If one is researching these, or searching this forum for posts by those of us who've owned them and discussed them in the past... I might politely point out that the model is technically called "Blue Floral." Even well-known vintage shops market them wrong. ;)

Technically speaking, "Blue Floral" is not correct. ;)

IMG_9305.JPG
 

Attachments

  • Brochure.jpg
    Brochure.jpg
    166.1 KB · Views: 108

BlueGillGreg

Tele-Holic
Joined
Jul 30, 2013
Posts
509
Location
New England
I'm not into the "relic"ing of new guitars, but I love that those two have clearly earned their looks. I was wondering about the difference in board wear, thanks for the bit about the trans Atlantic history of the blue one. As soon as I saw the red one my mind went straight to the transition between first position playing behind vocals and jumping to an anchor on the 12th fret with lots of bends on frets 12 to 15 in the solo... or at least that's what that fingerboard evokes for me. I can smell the beer, sweat, and cigarette smoke and feel the elbows in my side by looking at that guitar. Excellent.
 

Sax-son

Friend of Leo's
Joined
Mar 20, 2019
Posts
3,167
Age
73
Location
Three Rivers, CA
While we're reveling in our pedantry, I should note that the pink paisley guitars were technically called "Paisley Red" for reasons unknown.

Then again, around this same time period Fender introduced "Competition Burgundy" Mustang that was actually..... dark Blue. o_O


View attachment 1028684
I remember testing these out back when they were brand new at Wallichs Music City in Hollywood in the summer of 1968 (I think?) or possible early 1969, and although I thought they played pretty well, I wasn't sure about paisley color job. Contrary to popular belief, most players I knew were apprehensive about these. Time has its rewards though, and I was close to pulling the trigger on one, but I ended up buying a nice Gibson SG for less money from a guy who needed to sell it.

I later purchased a Japanese version witch I am pretty happy with, and the quality is good.
 

Highnumbers

TDPRI Member
Joined
May 11, 2009
Posts
56
Location
Orange County
I'm not into the "relic"ing of new guitars, but I love that those two have clearly earned their looks. I was wondering about the difference in board wear, thanks for the bit about the trans Atlantic history of the blue one. As soon as I saw the red one my mind went straight to the transition between first position playing behind vocals and jumping to an anchor on the 12th fret with lots of bends on frets 12 to 15 in the solo... or at least that's what that fingerboard evokes for me. I can smell the beer, sweat, and cigarette smoke and feel the elbows in my side by looking at that guitar. Excellent.

That's a very astute observation. On many maple neck 50s-60s Fenders, you can sometimes tell if the previous owner was the rhythm player (with wear at the first couple positions) or the band's lead guitarist, or sometimes both.

Both of these Teles have wear all over the board, but the Blue Flower is far more pronounced. In fact, the edges of the board were naturally rolled quite extremely. It's pretty comfortable, now that it's been refretted.

IMG_3009.jpg


IMG_3012.jpg
 

Highnumbers

TDPRI Member
Joined
May 11, 2009
Posts
56
Location
Orange County
although I thought they played pretty well, I wasn't sure about paisley color job. Contrary to popular belief, most players I knew were apprehensive about these.

It seems like people generally understand that these guitars weren't overwhelmingly popular in 1968-1969, hence why they are fairly rare today. They've grown a following over the years though, and like I mentioned in my first post above, their failure from a product mktg perspective is one of the intriguing aspects to me.
 

Rusty

Tele-Holic
Joined
Mar 27, 2003
Posts
596
Location
Bridge p/u
@daves561I’m not sure how far into 1969 they made these guitars, but it does seem like you see less in ‘69 (with the one-piece neck). Pretty cool.

Mine and James Burton's are both from August '69...Vince Gill's is a '69, but I don't know which month. George Gruhn told me 20 years ago that he had hardly ever seen '69s, and a search on Reverb ads only shows '68s atm...crazy!

I bought mine from Wanda Jackson's lead picker, Tex Wilburn, and had Glaser's shop do the frets back when Floyd Cassista was still there.

96CA86B1-1D8D-4971-A9E8-EBBEF9D1A40C.jpeg
531C7E62-C5BC-4DB2-9DA6-36283260C583.jpeg
 

Highnumbers

TDPRI Member
Joined
May 11, 2009
Posts
56
Location
Orange County
Nice one @Rusty ! I never knew that Burton's was a '69 or that the factory made them that far into the year.

It does seem like the '69s are a bit rarer. Some folks prefer the earlier maple cap necks, but it's just a matter of preference (I think the profiles are pretty similar between the two).

I know of a couple other '69 models on the market that aren't on Reverb (including one Blue Flower).
 

4Teles

Tele-Meister
Joined
Nov 5, 2006
Posts
209
Location
hampton beach nh
I’ve owned two. This one is from Jan ‘69 but the neck is November ‘68. The Paisley in the case was a ‘68 and my first one. It’s tone didn’t suit me and it weighed more than I like to hold. I sold it to a friend who’s a member here and it eventually ended up with Tom Petty
BB62FD39-A32E-4B72-B5CC-EFAC8FA7A07E.jpeg
 

Attachments

  • 27524104-AA1E-4B40-9A5D-9B764A209983.jpeg
    27524104-AA1E-4B40-9A5D-9B764A209983.jpeg
    452.4 KB · Views: 91
Top