68Kustom68
TDPRI Member
Hi,
After getting a very nice setup with some snaggy frets fixed, the action on my new used Tele still sucks. Yes, relief and radius and saddle height and intonation all done correctly. Then I recalled the low-cost (but nice) J200 knock-off that I got as a gift years ago--the guitar whose nut and saddle I filed and sanded to get the action down to playable.
I looked at my Tele's nut. Like, it looks a lot of space there. An original Fender USA factory nut on a Tele Pro CANNOT have been cut THAT high. Never as high as a cheap overseas pseudo-J200 ... right? Right?
So, I measured the action on that pseudo-J200 and my Gibson 135 by using a feeler gauge between 6th string and fretboard right at the nut. Both around .030 to .035" from bottom of 6th string to fretboard. (The doctored J200 is lowest!)
Now, measured the 2016 USA Tele Pro. A whopping .065" between 6th string and fretboard at the nut. An index finger and even a capo at the first fret cannot depress that string to the fretboard. It behaves like an Yngwie scallop job! Next, I checked my off-the-rack 2022 Pro II Strat. A little north of .060".
My J200 overseas knockoff had originally .058" clearance which made an F barre almost impossible, I recall, which is why I filed and sanded it.
Is .060" to .065" the Fender standard spec? A nut on TWO US-made 'Pro' model electrics are cut well higher than a Chibson J200 acoustic--really?
No amount of neck relief or saddle adjustment is gonna help action when a nut is acting as a pylon bridge. I'm thinking the Tele and new Strat need the slots filed down markedly. I'm also thinking this kind of thing needs to be done by a luthier and not the music shop techs doing setups.
Have any of you measured and modded a Fender this way to lower action?
After getting a very nice setup with some snaggy frets fixed, the action on my new used Tele still sucks. Yes, relief and radius and saddle height and intonation all done correctly. Then I recalled the low-cost (but nice) J200 knock-off that I got as a gift years ago--the guitar whose nut and saddle I filed and sanded to get the action down to playable.
I looked at my Tele's nut. Like, it looks a lot of space there. An original Fender USA factory nut on a Tele Pro CANNOT have been cut THAT high. Never as high as a cheap overseas pseudo-J200 ... right? Right?
So, I measured the action on that pseudo-J200 and my Gibson 135 by using a feeler gauge between 6th string and fretboard right at the nut. Both around .030 to .035" from bottom of 6th string to fretboard. (The doctored J200 is lowest!)
Now, measured the 2016 USA Tele Pro. A whopping .065" between 6th string and fretboard at the nut. An index finger and even a capo at the first fret cannot depress that string to the fretboard. It behaves like an Yngwie scallop job! Next, I checked my off-the-rack 2022 Pro II Strat. A little north of .060".
My J200 overseas knockoff had originally .058" clearance which made an F barre almost impossible, I recall, which is why I filed and sanded it.
Is .060" to .065" the Fender standard spec? A nut on TWO US-made 'Pro' model electrics are cut well higher than a Chibson J200 acoustic--really?
No amount of neck relief or saddle adjustment is gonna help action when a nut is acting as a pylon bridge. I'm thinking the Tele and new Strat need the slots filed down markedly. I'm also thinking this kind of thing needs to be done by a luthier and not the music shop techs doing setups.
Have any of you measured and modded a Fender this way to lower action?