Never heard of Nels Cline. I have heard of Fender.
Never heard of Nels Cline. I have heard of Fender.
Perhaps a slightly cynical view would be that Fender paid Nels in advance to get all bent out of shape - because now many more guitar-buying people are aware of this particular option than otherwise might be.
...and just checking...uh, nope, still don't care.
They have their own signature models because Fender decided to invest its resources into making them, I presume after some careful due diligence beforehand. I don't pretend to know Fender's market any more than you do. Suffice it to say if Fender wants to do a signature model of someone's guitar their justification will be grounded in solid market analysis. Or they lose their shirt and move on to the next business decision.Maybe so, but why the hell does Troy Van Leeuwen get a model, or Ed O'Brien? People have been asking when FMIC was going to do a NC Jazzmaster for some time--the guy turned on plenty of folks to the model. As for his sound, it doesn't matter what old people think of him, it's what certain folks like about his music. Certain young folks that Fender would be interested in selling guitars to.
They have their own signature models because Fender decided to invest its resources into making them, I presume after some careful due diligence beforehand. I don't pretend to know Fender's market any more than you do. Suffice it to say if Fender wants to do a signature model of someone's guitar their justification will be grounded in solid market analysis. Or they lose their shirt and move on to the next business decision.
Not sure what "old folks" you are dismissing here but its a safe bet that Fender Custom Shop doesn't share your arrogance. Seems counter intuitive to build an upscale product line around a market that is young, dumb and broke. Price point matters and that's a recipe for starvation.
The difference between Freddy an Nels is that Freddy got a free Guitar.
The difference between Freddy an Nels is that Freddy got a free Guitar.
View attachment 581037
Why is this a bad thing? Shouldn't people who only have $400 be allowed to purchase a Fender?
I don't see how being open to buying guitars made around the world is suddenly a "walmart mentality"
There are lots of good to great guitars made in Asia, Europe, Canada, Mexico and other countries. Allowing players a choice in what they play and how much they have to pay. The world would be a sad place for guitar players if they had only one option.
Okay. So you think that whomever in Fender's Custom Shop wasn't looking at images of his guitar when they crafted their overpriced gem? They weren't looking to hook some dentists that are rabid Wilco fans? I am not claiming that what Fender did was illegal, infringing on IP or TMs or whatever. I'm saying that they made a guitar that appears to be a replica of a famous artist's who is known for playing a bunch of Fender guitars. It seems like a bad idea on Fender's part to ruffle the feathers of someone who uses their products proudly, whose professional identity is wrapped up in the very guitar they appear to be reproducing.Even if the people at Fender (again, the make of the guitar and owner of all IP rights that will ever accrue in the guitar) looked at his guitar and others to ascertain what a worn, aged vintage guitar would look like, they did so with perfect legal rights.
Strummer's and Page's guitars were both intentionally modified to make them look unique. Cline's is just worn. Big difference.
... it doesn't matter what old people think of him ...
Ah, got it. Thanks for showing so much respect for the "old timers." I guess?Whoa buddy, who you calling arrogant? I respect the old timers.
... Nels ain't for everyone, but Fender would be wise to make a Nels-blessed Jazzmaster.
... Geeze, young dumb and broke? Kinda rude man...
You said it the best with far less words than me.Okay. So you think that whomever in Fender's Custom Shop wasn't looking at images of his guitar when they crafted their overpriced gem? They weren't looking to hook some dentists that are rabid Wilco fans? I am not claiming that what Fender did was illegal, infringing on IP or TMs or whatever. I'm saying that they made a guitar that appears to be a replica of a famous artist's who is known for playing a bunch of Fender guitars. It seems like a bad idea on Fender's part to ruffle the feathers of someone who uses their products proudly, whose professional identity is wrapped up in the very guitar they appear to be reproducing.
Ah, got it. Thanks for showing so much respect for the "old timers." I guess?
I don't know much about Fender signature guitars (and at the end of the day don't care much about that line) but the two examples you offered each had some unique characteristics or attributes that distinguished them from the stock guitar. Maybe that's a caveat with Fender Custom Shop, it needs to offer something unique. Nels guitar is a stock Jazzmaster as far as I know. Maybe the pups are upgraded, but I don't know even that.
Kinda business, man.
About what?
Fender (or its corporate predecessor in interest) built both guitars based on its designs and consistent with its trade dress, trademarks, and any other IP (if any existed for the Jazzmaster back when).
Fender then built the same guitar it built back then with the same attributes, IP, and trade dress and did a relic job on it that is entirely consistent with real world wear patterns exactly where one would exact a roadworn vintage guitar to be altered by age and use.
Is there a presumption by the uninitiated in IP law that random usage by multiple ownership somehow creates intellectual property in an owner of a old guitar in the patterns of wear and tear? I.e., that there is author or composer rights in a copyright patter on the guitar? Or that there is a trade dress or other trademark based right that accrues in an item someone else made and in which the maker retains TM rights?
Even if the people at Fender (again, the make of the guitar and owner of all IP rights that will ever accrue in the guitar) looked at his guitar and others to ascertain what a worn, aged vintage guitar would look like, they did so with perfect legal rights.
Uh, the business of selling guitars to people with money in their pocket.Old people=old folks=old timers, or at least I thought that's how it works. Let me rephrase that for you: it doesn't matter what old timers think of [Nels Cline]. Is it better for ya now?
The TVL Jazzmaster has a toggle switch for the rhythm circuit select, as opposed to a slide switch. That, and a B&B neck with matched headstock, custom color. Probably the most expensive MIM ever made. The O'Brien Strat has a big ol 10/56 boat neck, custom pickups, and a sustainer feature. That is pretty unique. Nels' "Watt" has the Mastery bridge (what Troy wanted on his), and SD Antiquity pickups. I think 250K pots. Not very unique, but certainly in line with the TVLs stock-ish setup. A Nels Cline JM could be simply a black JM with a nice tortoise shell guard and Antiquities and it would sell very well, but again, just speculation.
OK what business, exactly?![]()
Maybe it's my latent Midwestern dry humor, but I read Nels' post as more tongue in cheek than anything else. From what I've heard and read about him, he's a pretty chill guy, but who knows.
By calling it the "Watt" the guitar is clearly and very specifically based on Cline's Jazzmaster. That said, it looks like it's just a one-off and I would assume that anyone with enough cash can have FCS build a replica of their favorite guitarist's axe.