bingy
Friend of Leo's
I have had fantastic results using clear acrylic caulking and a small brush. No tissue or added fibrous material at all.
I appreciate Macaroonie's comments, and the contact info for Ken Haerr, and several other folk's comments as well. I also agree that IF YOU RECONE you should source parts from an expert in JBL. Nevertheless, any JBL expert will tell you that the JBL is a high precision device, the OEM parts themselves were very special compared to the garden variety Jensen/Oxford, and the tolerances in assembly are very very tight. Getting it to work and getting it to work as JBl intended can be two different things...and without a solid laboratory reference for "correct", any amateur re-coning for the first time is really just guessing about the final tonal outcome. (Not talking about properly equipped folks like Orange County, etc.)
No disrespect to BobbyZ either - Bobby, you know I truly respect your huge input and wisdom here on the forum. I just have serious doubts as to the ability of Chinese rebrand kits to meet JBL spec. This is based on a fairly thorough understanding and firsthand exposure to the typical deficiencies in Chinese mfg. practices. (Yes, I've been to China, and observed manufacturing practices.)
Remember, the difference between an OEM JBL edge wound voice coil and a Chinese "fits and works" may be only a few thousandths of an inch...but that few thousandths can make all the difference in the world in positioning the VC in the sweet spot of the magnetic flux in the JBL voice coil gap. This one factor hugely affects the efficiency and tonality of the speaker, as does the precise composition of the cone material. And this doesn't even get into such things as the precise metallurgy of the VC itself or the pliability of the surround, or a dozen other factors which make re-cone kit construction such a black art.
Based on a pretty fair familiarity with the inability of China-parts to hit tolerances and maintain metallurgy specs (and just personally) I would still attempt a quality repair on the one with the split edge. In my experience, if correctly done this speaker will function as new for many more years. Further, when properly repaired, it can be expected to sound exactly correct, because the parts are exactly original and aligned as JBL intended. Finally, you can always re-cone at a later date...but once you rip out the original parts, there's no going back.
I did not see the picture of the other speaker, which I understand by others comments must be re-coned to achieve a repair. I'm only talking about the one with the edge split.
Just my opinion.
I appreciate Macaroonie's comments, and the contact info for Ken Haerr, and several other folk's comments as well. I also agree that IF YOU RECONE you should source parts from an expert in JBL. Nevertheless, any JBL expert will tell you that the JBL is a high precision device, the OEM parts themselves were very special compared to the garden variety Jensen/Oxford, and the tolerances in assembly are very very tight. Getting it to work and getting it to work as JBl intended can be two different things...and without a solid laboratory reference for "correct", any amateur re-coning for the first time is really just guessing about the final tonal outcome. (Not talking about properly equipped folks like Orange County, etc.)
No disrespect to BobbyZ either - Bobby, you know I truly respect your huge input and wisdom here on the forum. I just have serious doubts as to the ability of Chinese rebrand kits to meet JBL spec. This is based on a fairly thorough understanding and firsthand exposure to the typical deficiencies in Chinese mfg. practices. (Yes, I've been to China, and observed manufacturing practices.)
Remember, the difference between an OEM JBL edge wound voice coil and a Chinese "fits and works" may be only a few thousandths of an inch...but that few thousandths can make all the difference in the world in positioning the VC in the sweet spot of the magnetic flux in the JBL voice coil gap. This one factor hugely affects the efficiency and tonality of the speaker, as does the precise composition of the cone material. And this doesn't even get into such things as the precise metallurgy of the VC itself or the pliability of the surround, or a dozen other factors which make re-cone kit construction such a black art.
Based on a pretty fair familiarity with the inability of China-parts to hit tolerances and maintain metallurgy specs (and just personally) I would still attempt a quality repair on the one with the split edge. In my experience, if correctly done this speaker will function as new for many more years. Further, when properly repaired, it can be expected to sound exactly correct, because the parts are exactly original and aligned as JBL intended. Finally, you can always re-cone at a later date...but once you rip out the original parts, there's no going back.
I did not see the picture of the other speaker, which I understand by others comments must be re-coned to achieve a repair. I'm only talking about the one with the edge split.
Just my opinion.
No disrespect to BobbyZ .
This is a really good discussion about this issue. It is reallynice to see civility and discussion, not flame wars.
As a man with a bitter experience of a recone of a K120 I have found this listing on eBay
http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/Recone-kit-for-JBL-D120F-K120-E120-/271281390236?pt=US_Pro_Audio_Speakers_Monitors&hash=item3f29a1829c
The blurb sounds pretty good. Anyone have any experience with this gentleman.
Result. Curious how you fixed the one that was split half the way round.,
.....So , not necessarily a bad cone ( the 2202 ) just not the correct one.
I'll bet it sounded dull /dark compared to the real deal.