psykobilly
Tele-Holic
Part of me is excited that I might actually own one sometime, another part is thinking “Is nothing sacred?”.
It wouldn't be the first time Fuchs was involved in "shady stuff".The story behind all this is pretty wild. There was shady stuff like Fuchs owning the Dumble domain name at one point. There was also a company putting out Dumble guitar pedals complete with identical graphics to what was used on amps.
This is way messier than even the Trainwreck continuation from what I understand. If I find where I read the stories I'll link them.
Part of me is excited that I might actually own one sometime, another part is thinking “Is nothing sacred?”.
The Dumble preservation group. Legally keeping the ownership of trademark . They needed a product. So they built a few amps.
Never heard of of Dumble until this year, is the only thing that makes them so expensive is the artist who played them ? On the other hand if a Dumble could make me sound like David Lindley maybe it would be worth it![]()
Yes, it seems they will not actually make any amps.
I guess they can't say that out loud/officially, it made for some strange interviews at NAMM.
It's great they are keeping the legacy alive and upholding trademarks IMO.
On the other hand, they are sitting on schematics and famous units etc, what's the use of it if no amps are built and everything remains secret?