Isn't the Telecaster ashtray bridge the coolest thing you've ever seen?

  • Thread starter Marcelo R
  • Start date
  • This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links like Ebay, Amazon, and others.

Marcelo R

Tele-Afflicted
Joined
Oct 3, 2014
Posts
1,279
Location
Uruguay
Some days ago I looked to my Telecaster and suddenly my eyes were caught by the sight of its unmistakeable "ashtray bridge". I thought it was the coolest thing I've ever seen, not only as a piece of the guitar but as a masterpiece of design - even as a little masterpiece of pure art. I'm talking about the whole thing, with the pickup and the strings included.

The whole set has the charme of a minimalist design, combined with the precision of a clockwork mechanism - those springs and bolts and the brass saddles. The slanted black pickup contrasts beautifully with the silver chrome plate. And then, with the strings on it, the set acquires a powerful and, in a way, menacing character - think of an electrified wire fence, for instance.

I kept watching the thing for a long while, like if I was hypnotized.

(I have to tell that this doesn't happens to me when I look, say, the Tune-O-Matic bridge of my beloved Les Paul).

Maybe I'm just losing my mind...

Any thoughts?

_3_6_301.jpg
 

Smiff

Tele-Holic
Joined
Oct 1, 2017
Posts
582
Location
UK
I’d say you need to join the stopping weed thread lol.

But I do the same with my Strat. Sometimes just spend time looking at the angle of the floating bridge plate and the angle of the saddles sat on it. It looks good now, it must have been amazing back in the 50’s. I do the same with the pickups; admiring how each one is a specific distance from the strings to optimise performance. It’s the sort of thing non guitar players don’t notice, but it’s all important.
 

Fiesta Red

Doctor of Teleocity
Joined
Nov 15, 2010
Posts
13,991
Location
Texas

Minimalist518

Tele-Afflicted
Joined
Mar 5, 2017
Posts
1,207
Age
63
Location
Albany
I agree wholeheartedly! The modern, six-saddle flat bridge plate does nothing for me. I’m also firmly in the string-through camp. I had two previous Tele’s that *didn’t* have the ashtray and, although there were many other (arguably better) reasons that I moved them on, the lack of the iconic bridge assembly was definitely a factor!
I can’t foresee my current guitar going anywhere though. I mean look at it; it just looks badass with the chrome ashtray, the DiMarzio ‘bucker and the compensated brass saddles. Dang! Right?
IMG_3552.JPG
 

Mike Eskimo

Telefied
Ad Free Member
Joined
Nov 9, 2008
Posts
28,416
Location
Detroit
Vintage bridge is great /iconic and I never had a problem playing my Tele's that had one, but the side walls are not necessary for me (or Keef or Campilongo) anymore.



I have a friend who borrowed a Tele from me for an extended period of time and he swore that the side walls were key to "the Tele sound".

"It creates a resonance/reverb/thing !"

Uh...no.

Kudos to Leo for simple effective industrial design though !
 

Minimalist518

Tele-Afflicted
Joined
Mar 5, 2017
Posts
1,207
Age
63
Location
Albany
I have to tell that this doesn't happens to me when I look, say, the Tune-O-Matic bridge of my beloved Les Paul.

View attachment 488532
I agree about the tune-o-matic/stop-tailpiece, and the Les Paul is probably my second all-round favorite guitar design. However, a bit of honest wear on the stop-tail where the plating gets burnished flat or worn entirely off by use goes a long way towards improving the aesthetic.
I do think that an old aftermarket Baddass bridge on an LP Jr. or SG Jr. looks very nearly as awesome – in a similar industrial grade, hyper-functional way – as an ashtray bridge does on a Tele.
 

JL_LI

Poster Extraordinaire
Joined
May 20, 2017
Posts
8,857
Age
75
Location
Long Island, NY
Does anyone play finger style with the cover on? I'm thinking a cover might look good on mine, definitely better than the busy appearance of six individual saddles.
 

Fiesta Red

Doctor of Teleocity
Joined
Nov 15, 2010
Posts
13,991
Location
Texas
Does anyone play finger style with the cover on? I'm thinking a cover might look good on mine, definitely better than the busy appearance of six individual saddles.
Yep. I use a modified fingerstyle technique (Chet Atkins I ain't), and I rest the heel of my hand on the bridge cover...Works for me!
 

JL_LI

Poster Extraordinaire
Joined
May 20, 2017
Posts
8,857
Age
75
Location
Long Island, NY
Close!

The prs wraparound bridge is about the closest thing to perfection that I have yet to come across...the tele vintage bridge is probably my second favourite though!

fFRx6Ku.jpg
Simplicity, functionality, and elegance. I saw it on a PRS McCarty and loved it. The bridge also takes on a beautiful patina. I have the guitars I need for now but there may be a McCarty in my future if I cross paths with the right one.
 

dkmw

Poster Extraordinaire
Joined
Mar 30, 2016
Posts
8,201
Age
70
Location
Florida USA
A year or two someone on here referenced the vintage Tele bridge as “tractor parts”. I thought that was genius but I didn’t save or bookmark the comment.

So I don’t know who to credit, but it’s a great description of the anachronistic charm and functionality.
 

IronSchef

Tele-Afflicted
Joined
Mar 12, 2013
Posts
1,103
Location
Flew here on my Dragonfly
I agree wholeheartedly! The modern, six-saddle flat bridge plate does nothing for me. I’m also firmly in the string-through camp. I had two previous Tele’s that *didn’t* have the ashtray and, although there were many other (arguably better) reasons that I moved them on, the lack of the iconic bridge assembly was definitely a factor!
I can’t foresee my current guitar going anywhere though. I mean look at it; it just looks badass with the chrome ashtray, the DiMarzio ‘bucker and the compensated brass saddles. Dang! Right?
View attachment 488537

That is one killer looking Tele - love everything about it!! :)
 
Top