cousinpaul
Friend of Leo's
I think the differences become smaller when playing through a pedal board.
From my experience, I´d say "mh, it depends"I think the differences become smaller when playing through a pedal board.
For many years, players have always commented on the tube overdrive quality that they were searching for. That wasn't my big attraction to tube amps. It was the clean tone that I loved. I have a Silverface Twin Reverb and a Deluxe Reverb reissue that gives me that in spades. For practice and small rehearsals, I also use a Hughes & Kettner Triplex solid state that comes as close to a tube amp that I have used. It sounds great with pedals and is loud enough to cut through the mix when dimed. Another good SS is the Peavy Bandit. I have never owned one but have played through a few over the years. They sound good in my opinion.Point 3 - Distortion can sound identical on any amp, period. So that comparison means very little. A clean tone, or a semi-clean tone (with some hair!) is where there is no comparison, in my opinion.
I dawned on me, when I was a tube purist, that most of my tone was actually coming from analog or digital pedals. After finding a good, up-to-date modeling amp, I lost both the tube amp and the pedalboard -- I am happy with the built-in effects and overdrive.For many years, players have always commented on the tube overdrive quality that they were searching for. That wasn't my big attraction to tube amps. It was the clean tone that I loved. I have a Silverface Twin Reverb and a Deluxe Reverb reissue that gives me that in spades. For practice and small rehearsals, I also use a Hughes & Kettner Triplex solid state that comes as close to a tube amp that I have used. It sounds great with pedals and is loud enough to cut through the mix when dimed. Another good SS is the Peavy Bandit. I have never owned one but have played through a few over the years. They sound good in my opinion.
I haven't read all 22 pages of replies, so I apologize if I'm just repeating what others have said......but, while I "think" I sometimes hear a difference, it's never enough to matter. Either can be good OR bad. My first "good" (to my ears) solid state was my first Vox Pathfinder 15R......amazing tones for a solid state. I gigged with a Pathfinder 15R in a cab with one 12" speaker for several years, and would still use it if the need arose. Lightweight, LOUD, and sounds great......everything I want in an amp.I thought I could, and spent years in a "tube only" phase. But this past week or so, I've come to the realization that it was all in my mind. Now, I can tell the difference between a good and a bad amplifier, regardless of technology. And I have owned bad tube amps and bad solid state amps; however, as far as tube "warmth", "dynamics", etc., I simply don't hear it. The seeds of doubt began a few years ago when I had a Fender Frontman with a built-in LED distortion circuit. I also had an ADA MP-1 which was the rackmount tube preamp of the late-80's into the early 90's. Anyone who was anyone had one of those. I plugged that MP-1 into the Fender Frontman clean channel, A/B'd back and forth between that and the Fender's distortion channel (with the MP-1 bypassed), and with a little gain and EQ tweaking, both sounded identical. The LED distortion of the amp sounded exactly the same as the MP-1.
"Dynamics" is one element that tube amplifiers supposedly excel in (responsiveness to picking), but every single amp I've played through, tube or solid state, would respond dynamically if the gain knob was set right. "Warmth"? I've been fooled plenty of times by what I thought was a tube amp that turned out to be solid state. I thought I got a fantastic deal on a Hughes & Kettner tube rack preamp when I was stationed in Germany. The price was great for what (I though) I was getting based on the tone I heard in the store. I opened it up to see how many 12AX7's were in there and all I saw was a circuit board...
Of course, there are things like tube rectifier "sag" that is exclusive to tube amps, and that is something I've never really had a thing for, though I understand some people love it. But as far as tone itself and dynamics, no - I can't hear the difference. Odd and even-order harmonics? Can't hear the difference.
I'm open to the possibility that if I sat down with one good example of each, and spent some time going back and forth, there might be something I'd notice, but that "something" just might be the difference between two different amplifiers anyway.
Tubes were what marketers today would call "first movers." They established the market. They came before other technologies. So it is logical that we compare the new to the old. If one had never played anything but one of today's leading solid-state amplifiers, and then heard tubes, would they immediately think the tube sound was superior? Or just different?The difference is that tube amps produce even order harmonics that make an amp "sing" while solid state amps produce odd order harmonics that are less sonically appealing. However digital modeling has changed much of that as they "model" or copy the audio signal that is produced by a tube amp. So it comes very close to sounding like a tube amp. However, the question is: do you want the real thing or a copy?
I was agreeing with you until this statement. This is the perfect example of why some people call those who love their tube amps and want to stick with them cork sniffers.But, for those of us who can hear and appreciate the difference and warm tone of a tube amp...
I've never been able to play guitar well enough to develop an ear for subtle things about amps (or guitars). But early in my life I spent hundreds of hours (maybe thousands?) hanging around high-end audio shops listening to all sorts of gear I'd never be able to afford.I am SO glad that I don't have the Golden Ears of the Gods. My Axe-FX II is good enough. A solid state amp is good enough. An amp in a pedal is good enough. A cheap guitar is good enough. Tonewood does not matter. Life is so much more simple that way. Now, I can understand that from a recording POV you want the best possible sound and that bringing a good well maintained tube amp to a recording studio makes sense. But most of us will probably never see a recording studio in our lives, and if we do we will end up with boxes full of unsold CD's because we are not major recording artists. The most successful guitarists nowadays don't even have bands anymore but play youtube. And youtube compresses and condenses the **** out of your sound anyways.
I say exactly the same thing about my Blues Cube.
There’s nothing particularly toxic about a tube factory.I'm a little surprised that you can't hear and feel some differences in the response because with the possible exception of some really well-developed and high-end SS rigs, there are slight differences that the human ear, fingers, and brain (which are super sensitive and can be highly developed) can sense and process. I'm fine with almost any workable amp, and have had both, but generally can tell them apart. That being said, there's no reason why differences have to mean "better" and "worse" because that depends on what you want. Since tube amps shaped what we think of as conventional, good guitar tone, I suppose we reflexively tend to think they sound right, but with all the processing going on now, including all kinds of amazing effects, and changes in musical styles, I suspect we are hitting a generational change in which what was once considered ideal is no longer really even a thing. I'm not sure the world really needs toxic tube factories at this point.
I thought I could, and spent years in a "tube only" phase. But this past week or so, I've come to the realization that it was all in my mind. Now, I can tell the difference between a good and a bad amplifier, regardless of technology. And I have owned bad tube amps and bad solid state amps; however, as far as tube "warmth", "dynamics", etc., I simply don't hear it. The seeds of doubt began a few years ago when I had a Fender Frontman with a built-in LED distortion circuit. I also had an ADA MP-1 which was the rackmount tube preamp of the late-80's into the early 90's. Anyone who was anyone had one of those. I plugged that MP-1 into the Fender Frontman clean channel, A/B'd back and forth between that and the Fender's distortion channel (with the MP-1 bypassed), and with a little gain and EQ tweaking, both sounded identical. The LED distortion of the amp sounded exactly the same as the MP-1.
"Dynamics" is one element that tube amplifiers supposedly excel in (responsiveness to picking), but every single amp I've played through, tube or solid state, would respond dynamically if the gain knob was set right. "Warmth"? I've been fooled plenty of times by what I thought was a tube amp that turned out to be solid state. I thought I got a fantastic deal on a Hughes & Kettner tube rack preamp when I was stationed in Germany. The price was great for what (I though) I was getting based on the tone I heard in the store. I opened it up to see how many 12AX7's were in there and all I saw was a circuit board...
Of course, there are things like tube rectifier "sag" that is exclusive to tube amps, and that is something I've never really had a thing for, though I understand some people love it. But as far as tone itself and dynamics, no - I can't hear the difference. Odd and even-order harmonics? Can't hear the difference.
I'm open to the possibility that if I sat down with one good example of each, and spent some time going back and forth, there might be something I'd notice, but that "something" just might be the difference between two different amplifiers anyway.