And I thought they were going to drop the "Washington" over the sheer embarrassment of the association.
I never heard/read anyone mention it before but it seems obvious to me.haha I suggested WTF as well, somewhere else on the innerwebs.
They could put ? stickers on their helmet for good (or, questionable?) plays, ala Ohio State![]()
My favorite potato.I never had a problem with the Redskins.
all true. and it won't matter. watch.Because Chiefs and Braves are terms of respect, unlike the team formerly known as. Oh, they should have just chosen an indecipherable symbol, like Prince!
wait, and they are still changing it?I never had a problem with the Redskins.
When I was a kid the Braves mascot was called Chief Noc-a-homa and it was exactly what you’re thinking, total caricature. He came to my elementary school in full headdress. They did finally get rid of him.Marc Maron would sue.
And how come the Chiefs and Braves get a pass ?
The tomahawk thing in ATL ?
The pow wow drum beating thing in KC ?
Chiefs are in because of s****y NFL rules - that’s it.
I think the Cleveland Upper Deckers would have been fun!
Why not have both? the Team could be named the Cleveland Steamers and the VIP suites can be the Upper Deckers
I don't think its about you.I never had a problem with the Redskins.
I agree . Maybe they could have gone with Misfits . The Washington Misfits just rolls off of the tongue . Or possibly , The Washington Rejects .......I never had a problem with the Redskins.
Wouldn't they have to move to Arlington if they were?but I'm still disappointed that they are not the Washington Generals.