How to adjust a CuNiFe Wide Range Humbucker

  • Thread starter Telenator
  • Start date
  • This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links like Ebay, Amazon, and others.

Telenator

Doctor of Teleocity
Vendor Member
Joined
Sep 19, 2005
Posts
16,577
Location
Vermont
I get this question all the time in my Telenator e-mail and have finally written up a procedure.
Setting up a pair of CuNiFe WRHBs is not that easy, and you will not get the best tone from them if you're unsure of what to do.

Because of the sensitivity of the threaded magnets, combined with finding the optimum overall pickup height settings, it becomes very easy to turn this seemingly simple process into a real mess. Following this procedure will make things go a lot faster and yield better results on the first try.

While these tips apply in large part to many other pickups, some of the information here is unique to the WRHB. Have fun!

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


How to adjust a CuNiFe Wide Range Humbucker for the optimum traditional tone.



NOTE: Before you touch anything……. Always start with the height setting first, and then turn the CuNiFe magnets as a fine tuning adjustment once you have the pickup set at the optimum position as described below.



Following this procedure will get you much better results and prevent unnecessary adjustment stresses on a new or vintage CuNiFe Wide Range Humbucker. It becomes very easy to start chasing your tail with these pickups if you’re not organized and methodical in your approach.



When you set the pickup height, start with the NECK pickup first.



1) Set all the CuNiFe screw heights even, with the round of the heads just sticking out from the cover. Then lower the exposed G, B and E string magnets flush with the cover.



2) Hold the strings down at the last fret, and adjust the neck pickup height so it sits 8/64's below the strings on the bass and treble sides. Make it level.



3) IMPORTANT: Play for a few minutes and listen to the sound. Listen for the balance, tone and attack. Do not rush this process. Let your ears grow accustomed to the sound.



DO NOT ADJUST THE CuNiFe MAGNETS YET!



4) Start to lower the pickup, just a half turn at a time, to get the bass and treble balanced.

Do not raise the pickup to adjust for weak balance.

Lower the side that is louder. It makes a difference.



As you go lower, you will start to hear some really great tones come from the pickup.

You'll find a sweet spot where the reduced magnetic string pull allows for greater sustain, yet the sound remains very articulate.



5) Stop lowering the pickup when the articulation starts to fade and bring it back up a half turn or so.



You will also notice some really nice “note bloom” from the wound strings where the sound actually swells a bit after you pluck the note. This is the ideal position for those wanting the traditional WRHB sound.



6) If you now notice that one of the strings is still a tiny bit weak, or loud, this is the time to adjust the CuNiFe magnets to get the final balanced sound.

If two or more strings do not sound balanced, re-adjust the pickup height first before attempting to balance it with the CuNiFe magnet screws.



7) Adjust the bridge pickup until the output is balanced with you neck pickup.

The bridge pickup is not nearly as fussy and will not have quite the same characteristics as the neck pickup so it's important to get the neck pickup sounding great first, and then adjust the bridge pickup to the desired balance and output level.



This procedure will yield great results for those seeking the best traditional tone. Rock it!
 

JimHalinda

TDPRI Member
Joined
Sep 27, 2013
Posts
54
Location
Canada
Hi Telenator, I have a set of your T2s in my Starcaster Reissue. I assume I can use this same method for those (minus the part about adjusting the polepieces)?

I'm hoping that the answer is 'yes', and that the 'traditional tone' means the best blend of dynamics, articulation and bloom?

Please advise,

Jim
 

Telenator

Doctor of Teleocity
Vendor Member
Joined
Sep 19, 2005
Posts
16,577
Location
Vermont
Hi Telenator, I have a set of your T2s in my Starcaster Reissue. I assume I can use this same method for those (minus the part about adjusting the polepieces)?

I'm hoping that the answer is 'yes', and that the 'traditional tone' means the best blend of dynamics, articulation and bloom?

Please advise,

Jim
Hi Jim, yes, absolutely use the method described above for MOD1 and 2. You will get great results.
 

hongaku

Tele-Afflicted
Joined
Dec 14, 2011
Posts
1,121
Location
Oakton, VA, USA
Interestingly, this method works a treat for the newer reissues as well. Still nothing even close to a proper WRHB, but much easier to balance and get a great sound from.
I was already using basically this same method for my tele custom with real WRHB, but recently put a thinline back together and only had a set of reissues to put in. Now I may still replace them with your Mod1, but it has a nice traditional humbucker tone that I might let ride for a while and see how it does.
 

JimHalinda

TDPRI Member
Joined
Sep 27, 2013
Posts
54
Location
Canada
I just finished - I adjusted the neck pickup over three days to give my ears a rest in between adjustments. (I'm ajusting Telenator T2s, with non-adjustable polepieces, in a Starcaster reissue).

I was surprised how much I had to drop the treble side of the pickup to get an even volume response !

I also lowered the bass side a half turn below the 8/64 inch starting point; the notes seemed to bloom better after that. Now the neck pickup is sensitive and has glorious overtones when letting single notes or chords ring, and that's with a squeaky clean amp setting!

I then adjusted the bridge to match volumes with the neck - I always check and make sure that I get a distinctly different third sound when both pick ups are on.

I really feel like I'm getting the maximum response out of these pick ups now, but will report back after next weeks rehearsal with the full band ... I may have to fine-tune the balance once I am buried in a mix.

Thanks again Telenator, you are a Wide Range guru!
 

Telenator

Doctor of Teleocity
Vendor Member
Joined
Sep 19, 2005
Posts
16,577
Location
Vermont
Glad to be of help.

WRHB's are tricky to get the best sound from, and it's always surprising to see where the pickups end up once they're adjusted. Sometimes I just have to stop trying to listen with my eyes! LOL.
Glad you're enjoying some success with the method. Wait til you hear it in the context of your band. Great sounds await.
 

JimHalinda

TDPRI Member
Joined
Sep 27, 2013
Posts
54
Location
Canada
I hope it sounds good with the band - these pickups in a Starcaster sound so different from the usual suspects that I doubt myself when hearing it alone. But it has never disappointed in a mix, and I think they're dialed in better now, a little more on the fence between single coil and humbucker, which is what I was after!
 

ruger9

Poster Extraordinaire
Ad Free Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2004
Posts
8,867
Location
Hackettstown, NJ
I assume the same method would also work with the several FeCrCro models on the market?

I have been surprised how sensitive WRHBs are to adjustments: moreso than my single coils, and MUCH moreso than my PAFs... a little goes a long way.
 

uriah1

Telefied
Ad Free Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2011
Posts
33,493
Location
Around
My neck WRHB TU2 is a tad too bassy. I have almost down all the way on bass side.
It might be amps. I think 1meg pots as recommended. I have not read the above
instructions yet.
 

Telenator

Doctor of Teleocity
Vendor Member
Joined
Sep 19, 2005
Posts
16,577
Location
Vermont
If you're finding the low end to be too bassy, I would adjust the pickup as described above and if it's still too bassy, try the tone knobs on the amp.
 

Telenator

Doctor of Teleocity
Vendor Member
Joined
Sep 19, 2005
Posts
16,577
Location
Vermont
I assume the same method would also work with the several FeCrCro models on the market?

I have been surprised how sensitive WRHBs are to adjustments: moreso than my single coils, and MUCH moreso than my PAFs... a little goes a long way.

The above described method will work fine with FeCrCo magnets because the method as described is about getting a great sound from this style pickup. Whatever the best sound is for a FeCrCo pickup, you will be able to get it by using method. It's very procedural and gets you there by taking small steps so you don't accidentally overshoot the best spot. Patience pays big dividends here. As you've stated, "a little goes a long way."
 

JimHalinda

TDPRI Member
Joined
Sep 27, 2013
Posts
54
Location
Canada
This method has definitely helped me find the sweet spot for these pickups!

I played my Starcaster (with Telenator T2s) through my main rig at rehearsal last night, and the neck pickup is sounding better than ever.

But what surprised me was how much better the middle position sounded. I've always balanced the two pickups so that I would get a distinct 'third' tone in the middle position, but now that the neck pickup is dialed in better, the middle position has come alive!

I have always liked the middle position sound, but it would never quite cut through well enough in a band context. So for clean, funk-type sounds I would use the neck pickup only. But last night I used the middle position and it sounded great!

It definitely pays to get the neck pickup right first, and then set the bridge pickup to match.

Thanks again, Telenator! Can't wait to gig with it this weekend.
 

Telenator

Doctor of Teleocity
Vendor Member
Joined
Sep 19, 2005
Posts
16,577
Location
Vermont
This method has definitely helped me find the sweet spot for these pickups!

I played my Starcaster (with Telenator T2s) through my main rig at rehearsal last night, and the neck pickup is sounding better than ever.

But what surprised me was how much better the middle position sounded. I've always balanced the two pickups so that I would get a distinct 'third' tone in the middle position, but now that the neck pickup is dialed in better, the middle position has come alive!

I have always liked the middle position sound, but it would never quite cut through well enough in a band context. So for clean, funk-type sounds I would use the neck pickup only. But last night I used the middle position and it sounded great!

It definitely pays to get the neck pickup right first, and then set the bridge pickup to match.

Thanks again, Telenator! Can't wait to gig with it this weekend.

I am so thrilled this worked out for you.
Consider yourself one of the few people who actually has the patience to do it correctly.
The neck pickup has tons of tone hidden in it that just leaps forward when you find the magic spot. Patience yield BIG dividends!
Setting the neck pickup first is key to getting the set-up right. Looking forward to hearing the "Gig Report."
 

ruger9

Poster Extraordinaire
Ad Free Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2004
Posts
8,867
Location
Hackettstown, NJ
I definitely prefer neck WRHBs to bridge ones. The inherent high-mids of the design sounds fabulous on the neck, but on the bridge it can get a bit "kerrangy" if you know what I mean. But yes- neck WRHB is one of the best neck tones, especially for gritty blues, I have found. MUCH prefer it to a PAF, and I haven't decided yet if I prefer it to a tele neck pickup... which is also quite good....maybe...
 

JimHalinda

TDPRI Member
Joined
Sep 27, 2013
Posts
54
Location
Canada
So I played my T2-equipped Starcaster at a gig on Saturday.

The neck pickup was just fantastic. We only had two songs where I used it that night, and it was just everything I could want, warm, full-bodied tone with glassy highs, and very responsive to my picking dynamics.

I used the middle position for four songs; it was a great, detailed, funky sound. In one song it didn't seem to cut through right, but on the other three it was great. I suppose the variation is due to how the rest of the band was playing during each song.

I really want to get more into using the middle position, as it sounds so good! And I get some nice variations by using the two volume controls to blend the two. Of course, the middle position is never quite as loud as either pickup by itself. I'm almost tempted to leave the pickup selector in the middle, dial in my basic tone based on that sound, and then just use the volume knobs to adjust the blend as needed for the song. I might try that at my next gig, but it will probably take a lot of getting used to, fiddling with the volume controls, especially as I do a lot of singing and a fair bit of pedal tap-dancing on top of that.

For the rest of the night, I used the bridge pickup. While it wasn't quite as magical as the neck and middle positions, it still had a 'just right' quality to it, having the right amount of single coil clarity with humbucker thickness. I think I now need to dial in my rig, and adjust my picking dynamics, to get the most out of the bridge pickup.

It's always satisfying when I reach a new milestone in my tone quest!
 

JimHalinda

TDPRI Member
Joined
Sep 27, 2013
Posts
54
Location
Canada
Oh, a related question (for Telenator or anyone): would 'adjust the neck pickup height first' be a good rule for all kinds of pickups, not just WRHB? Or, in other words, is the neck pickup the most sensitive to height adjustment regardless of pickup type?

I'm tempted to now adjust my humbuckers the same way, to see if it gets me a better middle position sound.

Thanks for any replies,

Jim
 
Top