Whatever most people consider a "normal" setup, I find very hard to play. I am a beater (think Townshend), and primarily play rhythm, rhythm/lead mixing, or relatively simplistic blues/rock/country/folk leads. For me, the typical guitar noodler setup is too low, too rattly, too flat, and has rubber band strings to top it off. I take that, go up one or two thicknesses in strings, raise the strings by at least 1.5X (sometimes 2X), and tighten the truss rod to compensate for the increased bow from the tenser strings. I like no less relief than normal, and usually a bit more. I do keep lighter strings on a few guitars, but those ones are tolerable to me because I really jack the strings up high.
Also, FWIW, "action" is not the same as string height. Guitar people erroneously use the two terms interchangeably. String height is a factor that affects action, but they are not the same thing. "Action" is not a measurement or even a description of a measurement. It should be used to describe the general ease of operation (or "feel") of the parts of the instrument that are manipulated by the player. E.g. the action of the vibrato, the action of the tuners, or the fretting action or bending action. Action should be discussed with terms like "smooth," " easy," "difficult," etc., not with "high" or "low," or "X millimeters" or "Y thousandths of an inch" (that's string height, not action). A sax player or a piano player discusses the "action" of his keys, e.g., without speaking of any particular technical spec (spring tension, etc). It's the same with guitar...though we are not in the habit of using the correct terminology. In short..."string height," not "action."