Guitar Quirks - Little Things That Should Not Throw You Off But They Do

unixfish

Doctor of Teleocity
Ad Free Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2013
Posts
17,015
Location
Northeast Ohio, USA
I will start with two.

#1 - Block inlays. I played a friend's Les Paul a bit back. For some reason, the block inlays made me have to think harder to know where I was on the fretboard. I have no idea why - maybe because I usually only play Fenders, and I'm used to the dots? The large blocks without the right glasses just threw me off a bit.

#2 - Reverse headstocks. I have played a few in stores. I guess I am used to seeing the 6th string tuner, and use that to help acclimate where the first fret is. When the headstock just sloped away and I cannot see the tuner, I get an unnatural feeling like my hand will slide off the end of the neck. It just felt "odd".
 

Killing Floor

Doctor of Teleocity
Silver Supporter
Joined
Feb 3, 2021
Posts
12,185
Location
Austin, TX
Painted body-dark fingerboard-natural headstock.

I’m ok with all maple or all rosewood, etc. But bright painted body with the dark neck and looks like someone forgot to finish the job. Just paint the headstock if it’s got an ebony or rosewood board.

I don’t stress too much about the guitars I own like that but still, jeez, don’t be so cheap.

You wouldn’t buy a car with an unpainted hood.
And it wouldn’t occur to anyone to make one.
 

Brent Hutto

Tele-Afflicted
Joined
Dec 6, 2006
Posts
1,601
Location
South Carolina
Now that you mention it I don't like block inlays. But if I really liked a guitar for other reasons I'm not sure I'd reject it just because of that.

Shape-wise I really don't like any pointy bits but again, I have an Ibanez that's pointy and I bought it in spite of not liking the shape.

One thing I really hate and it probably would make me not by a guitar is those "stop tail" bridges (not sure I that's the right name) but for intonation there's just a tiny little cam action thingy that lets the saddle move back and forth a fraction of an inch. That just seems nuts to me, one of the major benefits to an electric guitar is being able to completely adjust both action and intonation individually. Why do they put those on so many Gibson-derived guitars? Is it just for looks?
 

JIMMY JAZZMAN

Tele-Afflicted
Joined
Mar 26, 2019
Posts
1,347
Age
71
Location
Baltimore
Those half-moon edge-of-the-neck fret markers Gretsch uses on several models. I think they look stupid.
It's funny, I don't think they look that bad but sometimes I forget what key I'm in because of those thumbnail
markers. I know it's me but with other guitars with dot inlays or the Gibson inlays I have no problems. It may be a mental
problem on my end. Perhaps I should see a professional. Nevermind.
 

HaWE

Tele-Holic
Joined
Oct 3, 2015
Posts
676
Location
Germany, somewhere from the countryside
Somehow I do not like guitars and basses without a headstock
1669913292953.png
 
Last edited:

HaWE

Tele-Holic
Joined
Oct 3, 2015
Posts
676
Location
Germany, somewhere from the countryside
Agreed. I played a Strandenberg recently - I found I had the same feeling as the left handed headstock. No visual "end" and my hand just might fly off the fretboard.
I always have the feeling there is something missing at the end of the neck.I do not like the whole design- maybe because I am too much a fan of those "normal" oldstyle guitars :).
 

11 Gauge

Doctor of Teleocity
Joined
Mar 21, 2003
Posts
13,295
Location
Near BWI Int'l
It was a long time before I had a guitar with a Floyd Rose trem on it, and I discovered that part of my thumb and index finger would regularly make contact with the locking nut, in a slightly painful and uncomfortable way.

And on the topic of bridges, I just generally dislike any that aren't low profile, because I like to rest part of my picking hand on top, or sometimes I end up wrapping my pinky or ring finger around the lower side. I got a G&L ASAT Tribute about a year ago with the big old block of a bridge, and it's sometimes aggravating.
 

HaWE

Tele-Holic
Joined
Oct 3, 2015
Posts
676
Location
Germany, somewhere from the countryside
1669914024910.png

I somehow do not like tuners arranged like this.For me it always looks like someone had forgotten to drill a hole for the fourth tuner and therefore placed it on the lower side of the headstock.
I would always either put them all four in a row or two of them on each side- that single,poor lonely tuner on the lower side just does not look right to me.
 

11 Gauge

Doctor of Teleocity
Joined
Mar 21, 2003
Posts
13,295
Location
Near BWI Int'l
I guess I'll also be brave enough and admit that I just don't mostly care for '3-on-a-side tuner' headstocks. It's just more intuitive for me to have all the tuners in a row. I imagine I'd dislike the '4x2' stuff for the same reason. This all reminds me that I've never owned a 12-string guitar - I'd probably lose my mind with one of those!

I also dislike the 3-on-a-side for when it comes time to restring. I can never remember the right way to turn the pegs for one side versus the other. Yeah, I'm an idiot.
 

HaWE

Tele-Holic
Joined
Oct 3, 2015
Posts
676
Location
Germany, somewhere from the countryside
......

I also dislike the 3-on-a-side for when it comes time to restring. I can never remember the right way to turn the pegs for one side versus the other. Yeah, I'm an idiot.
Although I like ( "normal shaped" ) headstocks with 3/3 tuners, I have the same problems like you.When changing strings, I always wonder which way to turn the tuners .... so you are not alone :)
 
Top