forensicdoc
Tele-Meister
Like I wrote, I have both a J-45 and a Songwriter and they are very different sounding guitars.
Of course, everyone's different. I happen to prefer the Gibson acoustic tone. I know there are differences between models and materials and all of that. But Gibson acoustics do have a certain thing that I like. Someone else may prefer the signature Martin tone, which, again, varies from model to model. But there is still that thing that, when you hear it, you can say, Yeah, that's a Martin, or a good Martin derivative. Same with Taylor. I had a very nice Taylor. Played like a dream. But never got the sound out of it that i wanted. I don't think that makes Taylors inferior. Just different.
Your J45 vs Songwriter comparison is spot on. The more I've played the 2 over the last few weeks the more distinct I feel the two guitars are.
I'll add that on my quest for an acoustic guitar that would sound/feel good enough to inspire me to spend big bucks I played every Taylor, Martin, Gibson, and Larivee I could get my hands on for 2 years. As much as I told myself I wanted a Martin I've only played one (a D35) that really spoke to me. Taylor's are beautiful but a little too sweet sounding for me. Not every Gibson was a winner but I pick up more Gibsons that make me want to play them than Martins. I'm afraid Martin guitars might be my Les Paul - a gorgeous, well made guitar that just doesn't speak to me.
Update: I've still got the rental J45 and still would like to find a way to keep it; HOWEVER... a few days ago I came across a special run model of a Gibson SJ200 and I bought it. Still would like to find a way to keep the J45 but I might b content with the SJ200 and the Songwriter for the time being.
Last edited: