Fryette PS-100 Review

AxemanVR

Friend of Leo's
Ad Free Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2011
Posts
2,187
Location
Minnesota USA
`
I'd like to start this review off by pointing out how the Fryette PS-100 is often referred to as an "attenuator", but that label grossly minimizes what this device really does in my opinion.

Sure, it can attenuate - in the sense that you can turn it down - but functionally it's still a vacuum tube based signal amplifier, just one that reacts to an amp's speaker load (i.e. a "Reactance Amplifier") instead of something like a low level preamp signal.

It's basically designed to take a guitar amplifier's speaker output signal and further re-amplify it before driving a physical speaker (or not: *There are also options for silent "Direct-In" mixer and recording as well).

Its real value is providing practically unlimited control over your rig's output volume, either high or low, while still essentially retaining the original amp's character.

PS-100 a small.jpg



One of the main advantages of the Fryette PS-100 is that it allows me to scale my 12watt 2019 Fender '57 Custom Deluxe's perceived output volume so I can use it in practically any venue I may find myself in.

Probably the biggest problem with any Fender 5E3 Deluxe style amp is that you can really only dial it in for one sweet-spot (at least the the way I use it - heavy overdrive when the guitar volume is cranked but cleans up nicely when the volume is backed off).

So, being a single channel amp, I'm limited to the setting that works best no matter where I'm playing. In smaller clubs it may be too loud, while in larger clubs it may get drowned out. There are also other limitations in the 5E3 design, such as a single tone control and no effects loop.

Sure, the Deluxe can be modded to add such features, but I'm not willing to run the risk of messing with the uniquely pure gain structure that made me fall in love with it in the first place.

With the PS-100, not only can I adjust the overall volume of my little Fender Deluxe to suit various performance situations, but I can essentially channel switch and add effects at the end of the signal chain rather than at the beginning - not to mention providing the extra control for fine tuning the tone if needed.

So any simple amp can suddenly become vastly more versatile using the PS-100.

In my case I can crank my beloved Deluxe up to its sweet-spot while setting the overall output where I need it and even have the ability to switch between the two PS-100 channels for rhythm or lead playing. In that sense the Deluxe still works exactly the same way (riding the guitar's volume to dial in either clean or dirt), except now I can have the rhythm channel volume set a little higher, for example, since I usually lower the guitar volume to clean things up. Plus the effects loop can be utilized for effects that work best there, like reverb or delay.

I actually run an EQ pedal through my PS-100 effects loop, to add far more tonal adjustability to the far too limited single tone control that my Deluxe has. Previously I had to run the EQ in front of the amp, which only changes to character of the guitar, not the amp itself.

~~~~

Okay, so far I've been only pointing out the Fryette PS-100's advantages, but unfortunately there are a few notable downsides worth mentioning:


1) The roughly $1000+ price tag (as of Feb 2022).

Obviously not everyone needs something like this, so justifying getting one can be difficult - especially since there are definitely alternatives (such as channel switching amps that essentially have the same functions). Even so, I included some further thoughts about why someone might still want to consider getting a PS-100, even in those situations (to be addressed below).


2) It's Heavy.

Sure, compared to a Marshall 100 watt head this thing is smaller and lighter, but, compared to an average effects pedal, the PS-100 is ginormous!

At 16 lbs (7+kgs) you'll certainly notice its hefty mass when loading, unloading and setting up this behemoth. It's also difficult to handle since there's nothing to grab onto and I'm always afraid I'm going to drop it sooner or later. That's not only because of the weight, but because of the size, which leads to...


3) It's large and bulky.

Not only do I not look forward to lugging this thing around, but finding a place to put it also takes some forethought. This is partly due to its rather large footprint, but it also needs to be placed in a way where air can sufficiently circulate for cooling purposes, which leads to...


4) It runs hot!

You aren't getting 100 watts out of the two 6550 power tubes without a lot of thermal dissipation. While the PS-100 comes with a built in cooling fan, it still needs to have space for airflow to be effective. The company claims that it's designed to withstand the heat, but, being the paranoid person I am when it comes to my gear, I'd definitely consider bringing an extra fan on super hot days.


5) This is not a fault of the Fryette PS-100 in any way, but, one unavoidable side-effect of amplifying any signal is that you will also be amplifying any extraneous noise as well. So if your amp is noisy, then expect that noise to get louder as you crank the PS-100 up. Perhaps a noise gate might be useful (through the effects loop) if it becomes a major issue at concert level volumes.


Fryette sells a padded carrying case, as well as hardware to have it rack mounted, so some of the transporting issues might be minimized. I was considering rack mounting mine but am a little concerned whether rack mounting it would cause over-heating problems with it being in such a confined space. The padded case definitely seems like a good idea though, so I got that. along with their lighted footswitch, to complete the package.

~~~~

SOUND

So the number one question has to be "Does it retain the amp's original voice"? The answer, in my opinion, is basically "yes", BUT! It's not quite that straight forward either.

For one thing, since it has several switches and knobs that can be used to adjust the tone, by design there is no preset "exact copy" setting. That said, after tweaking things I was able to do an A/B sound test - where as far as I'm concerned any differences were virtually imperceptible *(at "unity gain": where the levels are the same whether the unit is bypassed or not).

Of course the real test is how it sounds when the volume is raised or lowered and what I found so far is that the original tone seems to hold true, with the only real exception being when turned down to very low levels, but I think that has more to do with "the laws of physics" rather than any "device based tonal degradation".

You see, as the the volume is decreased on the PS-100 some of the highs seem to get lost (just like they do on most attenuators), but I suspect that this is more of a mechanical trait of any amp not providing a speaker with an optimal amount of signal strength It just makes sense to me that any extremely low volume level will eventually lose some magic at a certain point. Amps with Master Volumes experience the same problem.

So I did find that I needed to adjust each channel's Presence settings, in particular, depending on what volume I was using. The lower the volume, the higher the Presence setting. But just as importantly I found that the higher the volume, the lower I had to adjust the Presence setting.

This is also where the effects loop really comes in handy, since I ran an EQ pedal through mine and was able to further fine tune the tone no matter what volume I was set on. Plus, in the case of my Deluxe, which has a single "treble roll-off" type tone control, the graphic EQ can further dial in the tone in order to balance the amp's tone "post-gain" (after the amp's gain stages instead of before them) and NOT the guitar tone (which is what happens when an EQ is placed in front of the amp).

As far as loudness goes, this thing can get blaringly loud!

I haven't tried mine through a 4X12 cab yet, but I'm fairly confident that I can blast as much volume as I'd ever need using the PS-100. After reaching a certain level of loudness it can be difficult to say whether the original sound is "exactly" the same, and at that point the only question is "does it sound good or not"? So far I've found that it does sound "plenty good", with things like "dynamics" and "picking attack" remaining intact, transparently reproducing the "feel" of the original amp as far as I can tell.

The "Hi" and "Lo" Input Level Switch is great for dialing in the best volume range needed. These labels seem a little counter-intuitive though, since setting it to "Lo" is actually what you'd use to make low powered amps dramatically louder and "Hi" doesn't get nearly as loud when either of the PS-100's channel volumes are cranked all the way up. In other words, the "Hi" setting is most likely what you'd use in order to attenuate the amp's volume.

The pair of 3-way "Flat/Brite/Edge" and "Flat/Warm/Deep" switches seem to be well designed to cover the most usable bass and treble ranges. My Deluxe is so fat that it definitely doesn't need any more bottom end, but I did find myself adding a bit more highs using the "Brite" setting.

Each channel also has individual "Presence" and "Depth" controls to tweak things even further. The "Presence" helps to dial in more top end brilliance while the "Depth" adds more bottom when needed. Once again, my Deluxe has so much bottom end that I pretty much have the "Depth" knobs rolled all the way off. The Deluxe could use a tad more top end though, so I found having the "Presence" knobs turned up to be a blessing in my case.

I haven't had a chance to try any of the "Line In" or "Line Out" features yet, otherwise the PS-100 pretty much does what they say it can do as far as I'm concerned.


~~~~


So, is the Fryette PS-100 a "must have" device?

Certainly not. But, for what it does, I think any serious performer who has a personal attachment to a specific amplifier would find something like this to be invaluable - even amps packed full of features!

For example, my other favorite amp is a Mesa Boogie TA-30 TransAtlantic which has an advertised overall output of 40 watts. It also has two footswitchable channels with a combined total of 5 "Modes" (Vox, Fender, Marshall and Mesa voices). These channels also have three power output level settings each as well (15 watts, 30 watts and 40 watts). In fact, my TA-30 pretty much covers just about any sound I normally require, and, as much as I'd like to take my Deluxe everywhere, I have to admit The TA-30 is often the better choice.

BUT. What if I find myself needing just a tad more output than what it can deliver? Or maybe I just desire a bit more clean headroom for a certain ambience? Needless to say I will probably always have the Fryette PS-100 hooked up and ready to go at any important gig - even if I don't use it... you know, just in case.

Obviously 100 watts can be overkill in most situations, and, truth be told, I could have probably gotten away with getting the Fryette PS-2 (which has only 50 watts), but for about $100 more the PS-100 has twice the power and an extra channel, so for me it was a no-brainer.

While I may never use the 100 watts this amp has on tap, it's still comforting to know that any setup I choose to take will have the ability to reach practically any volume I need. But, just as importantly, I may also need to turn the volume down in certain places as well, and this way I can rock the amp's sweetspot without the risk of blasting people in smaller clubs too.

Anyway, so far the Fryette PS-100 has totally lived up to every possible expectation I've had and I highly recommend it to anyone looking for maximum flexibility for their favorite rig...

Good Luck!

5DEED3FC-6724-4854-9BC1-1452E7D06475.jpeg




.
 

Tim S

Friend of Leo's
Gold Supporter
Joined
Oct 27, 2008
Posts
2,152
Location
Upstate NY
@AxemanVR Thank you for your comprehensive review. It’s the most useful info I’ve read about the PS-100. Over the last couple of years, I’ve thought about getting one. I merely play at home, so such a purchase would be a complete luxury. That’s why I hold off.

Your post allowed me to understand what owning one is like. (And getting me to understand is quite an accomplishment) 😉
 

middy

Poster Extraordinaire
Joined
Apr 28, 2010
Posts
5,079
Age
52
Location
MSP
I love a 57 Deluxe, and a I’ve wanted a PS100 for a long time, but I have to say, if you have a good PA, going direct with one of these Universal Audio Woodrow modelers is super convenient and gives you all the same advantages for 10% of the cost. They sound and feel bloody fantastic for a modeler.




Z696LAt.jpg
 

ETMusic777

Tele-Meister
Joined
Apr 29, 2022
Posts
488
Location
Parts Unknown
I have a PS100 and love it. I am using it every day recording a record that I am working on with my vintage Fender blackface amps outputting to the Fryette. A couple points to also mention in addition to the review: The selectable impedence is an outstanding feature and opens up every possibility for a head and cab combo. For example, I can use my 2ohm Super Reverb with an 8ohm cab, or my 4ohm Pro Reverb with the 2ohm Super Reverb cab with no problems at all, no worries about destroying the vintage OT, just switch the impedence on the back of the PS100. The PS100 also has great depth and presence controls which actually help to shape the sound. There is no tone loss when running though the PS100. It also can work as a stand alone amp if needed in a pinch. If your are playing live and the vintage amp goes out, I could plug my effects unit in to the line in and play away. In addition to attenuating, it will also reamp a small amp to make it louder, like running your Fender Champ to drive Wembley Stadium. Its a swiss army knife for guitarists.

Here is Tim Pierce

 

blues

Tele-Holic
Joined
Oct 4, 2003
Posts
844
Location
Pa
In other words, the "Hi" setting is most likely what you'd use in order to attenuate the amp's volume.






I found the opposite with my 1974X. I was using the Hi setting. I was dialing in my amp and I just could not get it how it wanted it.

I would crank amp and then dial in the Fryette to match but it was not
quite right. Even after moving the switches and the level and EQ controls. The low end was the problem. It could get a little to distorted
when trying to bring the low end back.

I thought it was just the nature of the beast. I was wondering how could all the reviews say different.

It was not until I used the low setting that I found what was missing for me. They key was to keep the level control lower.

After that I felt that the controls on the Fryette where enough to get
what I needed. No need for an outboard EQ.

I normally keep the presence and depth controls at about 3 o'clock. The toggle switches to bright and warm. Sometime I set one to deep if I
am plugging into different speakers or speaker cabinets.

My amp actually has less hum though the Fryette than the amp itself.

For the most part I play a tele. I plug straight into the Marshall. I can say that the Fryette was the best gear purchase I have made in a long time.

If you normally use OD/Boost/Dirt pedals to find your sound you might
be surprised how un-amp like they really sound. Or how much extra noise they may add. Also if you have bought many trying to find your sound. Or if you are still searching.

If this is the case the Fryette will pay for itself over time. I bought the PS2A to save some money. I don't have a need that the 100 provides
 
Last edited:

muudcat

Tele-Holic
Silver Supporter
Joined
Jan 3, 2010
Posts
914
Location
Fountain City, Wi
I'm still waiting for Freyette to replace the tubes for the Power Station under warranty from last March
 

AxemanVR

Friend of Leo's
Ad Free Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2011
Posts
2,187
Location
Minnesota USA
The "Hi" and "Lo" Input Level Switch is great for dialing in the best volume range needed. These labels seem a little counter-intuitive though, since setting it to "Lo" is actually what you'd use to make low powered amps dramatically louder and "Hi" doesn't get nearly as loud when either of the PS-100's channel volumes are cranked all the way up. In other words, the "Hi" setting is most likely what you'd use in order to attenuate the amp's volume.
I found the opposite with my 1974X. I was using the Hi setting. I was dialing in my amp and I just could not get it how it wanted it.

I would crank amp and then dial in the Fryette to match but it was not
quite right. Even after moving the switches and the level and EQ controls. The low end was the problem. It could get a little to distorted
when trying to bring the low end back.

I thought it was just the nature of the beast. I was wondering how could all the reviews say different.

It was not until I used the low setting that I found what was missing for me. They key was to keep the level control lower.
.
So I looked further into this and discovered something rather interesting…

Like I said, I’ve been using the “Hi” Level as my way of “attenuating” my cranked amp (lowering the volume) and I thought it sounded pretty good, but then I switched it over to the “Lo” Level setting and noticed a remarkable difference.

*(keep in mind the “Lo” Level setting provides a much higher perceived output than the “Hi” Level setting when the channel Volume knobs are cranked - at least it does on mine).

Also keep in mind that I use an EQ pedal through the PS-100’s effects loop to help dial in my sound more, but without even adjusting it the difference was very apparent.

Using the “Lo” setting requires lowering the PS-100 channel volume quite a bit in order to keep the perceived output approximately the same compared to when using the “Hi” setting.

Anyway, instead of loosing some highend treble response (as I was expecting) using the “Lo” setting actually sounded clearer and brighter than it did at a similar perceived volume while in the “Hi” setting.

I’m still investigating these two settings and will report back if I find anything new to add…

.
 
Last edited:

Wespaul2000

TDPRI Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2014
Posts
3
Location
Houston, TX
I love a 57 Deluxe, and a I’ve wanted a PS100 for a long time, but I have to say, if you have a good PA, going direct with one of these Universal Audio Woodrow modelers is super convenient and gives you all the same advantages for 10% of the cost. They sound and feel bloody fantastic for a modeler.




Z696LAt.jpg
I'm late to this party, but I also got a Woodrow. I think it sounds fantastic and is easily one of the most "alive" sounding amp modelers I've ever experienced. The only problem I've run into is how best to chain it with others. It doesn't seem to play well with other pedals on my board. That's more likely a mark against my other gear, because the Woodrow sounds perfect by itself. I've reconfigured my board many times over the last few months and it's just not working out. Mostly having issues with delays and reverbs. Great gear shines a light on not-great gear, I suppose.
 

SoK66

Tele-Afflicted
Joined
Oct 2, 2007
Posts
1,858
Location
Four Corners USA
I have the PS2A and can't say enough superlatives about it. Without doubt the best piece of outboard gear I've ever used.
 




New Posts

Top