I have a 2014 Fender '51 Nocaster Relic. Weighs just under 7 lbs. 9.5" radius, 6105 frets. Started life with Fender CS Nocaster Pu's but I swapped them with a set of Nordstrand NVT Alnico III PU's. Its been a stellar great guitar.
I recently played a '52 Fender CS Tele, Heavy relic, Ncoaster U shape necl profile, CS Nocaster PU's, 9.5" Radius, 6105s. The heavy relic '52 has a more open, organic, responsive resonant tone that can get very twangy and classic, or sweet, clean, bluesy. What is remarkable about the '52 is the open, resonance. It plays effortless and is so 'alive'. I briefly compared my Nocaster Relic (But just 10 mins before shop closed) The '52 is snappier, brighter, twangier. Mine is warmer, bigger, deeper, a little but tighter sounding. Hard to describe.
I can't get that '52 out of my head. Can't really justify both guitars since they are different but VERY similar. So I am trying to decide whether to sell my '51 Nocaster for the '52 Heavy relic.
Things I like more about the heavy Relic: The back of the neck finish is well warn and the lacquer is gone in the player area from 1st to 14th fret or so. VERY comfy.
The biggest thing is the open, airy, resonance that is tonally expressive and very deep. Keep in mind, until now, my Nocaster has beat most other Nocaster or tele's I've compared it to. But this '52 has something special.
Arguably, they are the same guitar. Ash/Maple, similar weight, U Shape Nocaster neck, 9.5" Radius, 6105's. Mine has different PU's but I still have the stock Nocaster PU's.
Suggestions? I wonder how different is the '52 model traditionally compared to a '51 Nocaster?
I recently played a '52 Fender CS Tele, Heavy relic, Ncoaster U shape necl profile, CS Nocaster PU's, 9.5" Radius, 6105s. The heavy relic '52 has a more open, organic, responsive resonant tone that can get very twangy and classic, or sweet, clean, bluesy. What is remarkable about the '52 is the open, resonance. It plays effortless and is so 'alive'. I briefly compared my Nocaster Relic (But just 10 mins before shop closed) The '52 is snappier, brighter, twangier. Mine is warmer, bigger, deeper, a little but tighter sounding. Hard to describe.
I can't get that '52 out of my head. Can't really justify both guitars since they are different but VERY similar. So I am trying to decide whether to sell my '51 Nocaster for the '52 Heavy relic.
Things I like more about the heavy Relic: The back of the neck finish is well warn and the lacquer is gone in the player area from 1st to 14th fret or so. VERY comfy.
The biggest thing is the open, airy, resonance that is tonally expressive and very deep. Keep in mind, until now, my Nocaster has beat most other Nocaster or tele's I've compared it to. But this '52 has something special.
Arguably, they are the same guitar. Ash/Maple, similar weight, U Shape Nocaster neck, 9.5" Radius, 6105's. Mine has different PU's but I still have the stock Nocaster PU's.
Suggestions? I wonder how different is the '52 model traditionally compared to a '51 Nocaster?