El Degas Les Paul Custom

  • Thread starter boneyguy
  • Start date
  • This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links like Ebay, Amazon, and others.

boneyguy

Doctor of Teleocity
Joined
Mar 31, 2007
Posts
14,140
Age
67
Location
victoria b.c. CANADA
I'm going to check out this El Degas Les Paul Custom on Friday but I'm kinda curious about it.

Here's the ad:

$325 - 70's El Degas "Les Paul Custom" copy

Rare "Lawsuit era" guitar. Same construction, and by many considered as good or better than Gibson Les Pauls of that era. Set-neck. Great sounding pickups. Re-wired with new pots and caps.

The ad says it's a 70's lawsuit, presumably MIJ, blah blah etc etc El Degas (I guess that's the poor man's equivalent of having 'TG' on the butt end of your Tele neck) but I'm not sure about a couple of things.

Firstly, if it was lawsuit era wouldn't actually look more like a real LP. This to me looks post lawsuit era where they've been forced to make it look not so LP'ish, no?

Secondly, I can't find any photos on the net that match exactly the look of this guitar from that era. As you can see there is no accent over the 'e' in Degas and I can't find any other photos where that's the case.


I also can't seem to find any pics of El Degas LP's with that very sharp Florentine cutaway.

Also the pics make this guitar look like there isn't any wear and tear on it. Could just be the lousy pics.

It seems like a crazy thing to wonder but would a manufacturer actually go to the trouble of making fake El Degas's!! I can't believe that could happen could it? Nah, that's crazy.

Anyway, are there any fans and knowledgeable folks here that know about these ED guits. I remember them from the 70's and early 80's but they always seemed to be cheaply made.


image removed


image removed


image removed


image removed
 

goldtopper

Friend of Leo's
Joined
Dec 30, 2005
Posts
4,510
Location
Liberal Lakes
"Lawsuit Era" in this case seems to apply to a period of time as opposed to that guitar itself.
I will henceforth refer to my formative years as my lawsuit era.
 

rjones652

Tele-Meister
Joined
Apr 2, 2011
Posts
251
Location
Oregon
To find out more about that guitar, you might try cruising thru this forum:
http://www.eldegas.com/forum

I just found it...the whole site looks pretty new, but you might be able to find out something about who actually made it, etc.

One sad thing about the "re-brander" guitars: they name-owners would often change manufacturers from year to year (Sears did this with Silvertone, so did Electra at one point).
 

jkingma

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Nov 15, 2006
Posts
13,307
Location
46.050888, -79.801023
My first guitar was an El Degas LP. It was a great guitar and I really wish I still had it.

image removed

I'm going to have to check out that forum. Thanks for the link rjones652.
 

losergeek

Tele-Afflicted
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Posts
1,532
Age
47
Location
ottawa
My understanding of the 'lawsuit' LPs is that you're mainly looking at the headstock - if it's got the 'open book' Gibson style headstock then it was one of the guitars implicated (which this one does).

From a quality perspective, I think it's more about the guitar being made in Japan during the 70s - that seems to be the sweet spot for these guitars, whether they were blantant rip offs or not.
 

boneyguy

Doctor of Teleocity
Joined
Mar 31, 2007
Posts
14,140
Age
67
Location
victoria b.c. CANADA
"Lawsuit Era" in this case seems to apply to a period of time as opposed to that guitar itself.
I will henceforth refer to my formative years as my lawsuit era.

:lol: I think it's become a pretty broad term now. That's why in my OP I referenced the 'TG' initials on all the fake Tele necks. You've just gotta say even if it isn't true because it's what people wanna hear I guess.

To find out more about that guitar, you might try cruising thru this forum:
http://www.eldegas.com/forum

I just found it...the whole site looks pretty new, but you might be able to find out something about who actually made it, etc.

One sad thing about the "re-brander" guitars: they name-owners would often change manufacturers from year to year (Sears did this with Silvertone, so did Electra at one point).

I already did some searching on that forum but didn't turn up anything substantial.
 

boneyguy

Doctor of Teleocity
Joined
Mar 31, 2007
Posts
14,140
Age
67
Location
victoria b.c. CANADA
My understanding of the 'lawsuit' LPs is that you're mainly looking at the headstock - if it's got the 'open book' Gibson style headstock then it was one of the guitars implicated (which this one does).

From a quality perspective, I think it's more about the guitar being made in Japan during the 70s - that seems to be the sweet spot for these guitars, whether they were blantant rip offs or not.

Okay, I see. I assumed it was the whole shape that made it a lawsuit guitar not just the headstock. On most of the El Degas pics I've seen from that era the headstock inlay is also a direct Gibson copy but on the headstock I posted you can see they've changed it which makes me think by the time this particular guitar was made they were already feeling the pressure from Gibson's legal dept. :D
 

weemikey

Tele-Meister
Joined
Oct 1, 2003
Posts
385
Location
North Vancouver, BC
I think the El Degas brand was pretty good. My buddy had an ES-175 copy that was killer, and I've seen a local (Vancouver) blues guy with an El Degas Es-335 style that was a beauty as well. I'd jump all over that LP. Looks cool!
 

losergeek

Tele-Afflicted
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Posts
1,532
Age
47
Location
ottawa
Okay, I see. I assumed it was the whole shape that made it a lawsuit guitar not just the headstock. On most of the El Degas pics I've seen from that era the headstock inlay is also a direct Gibson copy but on the headstock I posted you can see they've changed it which makes me think by the time this particular guitar was made they were already feeling the pressure from Gibson's legal dept. :D

Ya, you can't copyright the general shape of a guitar, however you can do so with specific details like the headstock - that was the only real reason Gibson could take legal action.
 

boneyguy

Doctor of Teleocity
Joined
Mar 31, 2007
Posts
14,140
Age
67
Location
victoria b.c. CANADA
Ya, you can't copyright the general shape of a guitar, however you can do so with specific details like the headstock - that was the only real reason Gibson could take legal action.

But it's my understanding that Gibson spent years going after PRS because of their single cutaway guitars. That's why PRS was only making double cutaways for the longest time. Finally it was decided in favour of PRS and satan lost that round.:rolleyes:
 

chuck_zc

Tele-Meister
Joined
Feb 25, 2006
Posts
436
Age
55
Location
Newfoundland Canada
Here's mine from a few years back..Sadly sold it..
 

Attachments

  • eldegas.jpg
    eldegas.jpg
    23.4 KB · Views: 1,700

sneakyjapan

Poster Extraordinaire
Joined
Mar 17, 2003
Posts
5,833
Location
nippon
..."and by many considered as good or better than Gibson Les Pauls of that era"...


doesn`t every seller say this?
 

losergeek

Tele-Afflicted
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Posts
1,532
Age
47
Location
ottawa
sneakyjapan said:
..."and by many considered as good or better than Gibson Les Pauls of that era"...

doesn`t every seller say this?

I think you need to emphasize "era" since it wasn't a great period for the major brands and was a relatively good period for the japanese manufacturers.
 
Top