grolan1
Friend of Leo's
No experience with the smaller new Jensen speakers, but I agree, I had a pair of C12N's in a Bassman cabinet that sounded fantastic. No complaints at all.
I ran mine about 90% overdriven (pedals) and they sounded great to me... very mid range with a lot of meaty bottom in and a nice top end as well.Yeah the clean was ok and they seem well built as well. My issue was the sound I started getting with even just moderate OD. So boxy and congested and strangled. Maybe mine were all just too new?
The C12Ns are the only ones I've used for any length of time. I was surprised how different the C12K sounds. I prefer the N. Point being, they're not even close to the same. IMO.The one I just took out of the traynor is a C12k. I noticed that there is almost no flex in the rim of the speaker. Kinda explains the stiff sound
They don't now make a C10N.I have played a PRRI with a C10N (or was it a C12N?) and I have heard @moosie 's C12N's in his Twin. I loved the sound of all of them. I had a C12K in a DRRI once, and I took it out. It wasn't bad, but I found it too harsh in the top end. I think some of the Jensen "reissue" speakers sound good, depending on the amp, and some do not sound as good.
I forgot to mention, I like the P10Rs in my Super RI. Circa 2003...c10r = like
p10q = like
c12k = dont like. One of the reasons every time I try a DRRI in store I am turned off. Shrill, stiff and bright. The C12n seems like a much better speaker based on recordings Ive heard