Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Bad Dog Cafe' started by Togman, Dec 3, 2020.
Phew , I’m in the clear ! Better keep buying
The bicycle version is much simpler:
While the minimum number of bikes one should own is three, the correct number is n+1, where n is the number of bikes currently owned. This equation may also be re-written as s-1, where s is the number of bikes owned that would result in separation from your partner.
edit: i own 3
Yes, I do.
Alright! I'll tell my wife my next purchase has been justified by a Guitar Squid.
My name is Dan, and I'm a guitaraholic.
I took the second-fastest route to "Buy more guitars". I guess that settles it.
As the country song says, that's like having a girl too pretty, a car too fast, or too much fun.
I don't name my guitars, so I got lost on that question.
I don't need no stinkin' flow chart. I clearly own too many guitars!
Oh, and Rule #5. Always Rule #5!!
I don't need no stinking flow chart to tell me that one can never have too much of something that they enjoy.
There's a guy on Squier Talk who has "over 600". That's up there in Bonamassa territory.
Do you have too many Guitars?
Two are missing - projects under construction.
I have one acoustic, one classical, one bass, and four electrics. I am contemplating selling two electrics, although I don't need $$ or want something else. My wife has no interest in how much I spend on guitars. I don't need, or more to the point, want, any more guitars.
In answer to the OP's question, I may have two electrics too many.
NO, NO I DO NOT
"Pictures, or it never existed" - well, it's too easy to say "I have 600 guitars" without serious pictures...
I have simultaneously too many guitars but also not enough at the same time.
I show this video to most of my 1st year classes: