I think this was along the lines of what I was thinking. Relatively easy to swap out parts by the look of it.
I think this was along the lines of what I was thinking. Relatively easy to swap out parts by the look of it.
I think this was along the lines of what I was thinking. Relatively easy to swap out parts by the look of it.
Yes, it's easier to replace parts on older amps, but what's even easier is to not HAVE to replace any parts!I was thinking about old amps and how much easier they are to replace parts etc and how people like to keep them going for years and years and got to thinking about the future when valves/tubes might not be so easy to obtain etc pt and ot trabsformers aint cheap either.
A lot of modern solid state amps use quite specialised components that cant be repaired so i wondered if there was any mileage in building a hand wired solid state amp? Or maybe a hybrid?
Perhaps good amps are just too cheap to bother worrying about it? Or maybe they will last much longer than a valve amp anyway. I do have a peavey tnt150 bass amp from the 80s that is still going strong.
Any thoughts? Is this a dumb idea?
I would love to make a hand-wired point-to-point SS amp. I'd use transistors in those big TO-126 and TO-220 packages (overkill for small signals, I know...), and power it with ±35 volts like the big SS hi-fi amps. Maybe even use P- and N-channel MOSFET pairs wired up as Inverters for the gain stages. I'd also use big MOSFETs in TO-3 packages for the power section, output through an audio transformer. A pipe dream perhaps, but it's MY pipe dream, darn it...
May I ask what that brown squarish component is in the first picture? Never seen that in SS or any other amps.
It's a power transformer, I'm sure you've seen them before in other amps but maybe not this construction style which I think is called "open-frame".May I ask what that brown squarish component is in the first picture? Never seen that in SS or any other amps.
Hope to learn something new today....
I personally rather like working with PCBs (especially the roomier ones). But looking at from a repairability pov it depends what fails. If a discrete component with a readily available replacement fails it's pretty repairable. If the something has caused a trace to fail it gets more complicated. In terms of design and manufacturing a PCB usually represents several iterations of refinement to get things right and once that is captured it can be produced in volume (and this is a good thing). The advantage of P2P, eyelets, perfboard etc is that the cost of modification is low - the process is fluid. The tradeoff is that manufacturability is also low. For a hobby builder this is a good trade. For someone wanting to sell amps... depends. The idea of a boutique SS amp builder kinda makes me smile.In general just to be clear I don't think that the handwiring part gives it any special abilities, I think I meant point to point wiring really. although It would still need to be handwired as I don't have the equipment to do anything else.
I don't have anything against PCBs as such but I feel that there is more chance of it being unrepairable in the future compared to simple point to point. I don't know much about repairing pcbs but I would guess it is slightly more difficult.
Thanks for all the links I'll have a look. I did a quick google but wasn't really sure what to look for, I was mostly searching to see if there were any boutique brands building handwired point to point SS or hybrid amps but didn't see any as such. Probably just need to look harder.
thanks all
After building 2 tube amps and really falling in love with the old tweed thing I really didn't see myself ever wanting to build a SS amp. These projects were expensive and a bit stressful because of the risk involved with high voltage and just the frustration in the troubleshooting phase, along with the investment of money and time. I built the eyelet boards from laminate and sourced all the parts from various suppliers. By doing this I learned a ton, but just buying a kit would have been much easier.The advantage of P2P, eyelets, perfboard etc is that the cost of modification is low - the process is fluid. The tradeoff is that manufacturability is also low. For a hobby builder this is a good trade. For someone wanting to sell amps... depends. The idea of a boutique SS amp builder kinda makes me smile.
I think you can get an awesome sounding amp or pedal with SS. How much of the "vintage tube amp" you get probably depends on what part their behavior is important to you. I started my circuit building journey from the SS side with the goal of building something I liked and not necessarily trying to replicate any particular sound. But what that led to was wanting to understand what tube amps really do (and the more I learn the more I feel like a novice). There is very much a sense in which I want to eventually build some vintage character tube amps. But there's also a sense in which I want to do that to inform the kind of SS projects that also interest me. So maybe I am trying to replicate a sound.After building 2 tube amps and really falling in love with the old tweed thing I really didn't see myself ever wanting to build a SS amp. These projects were expensive and a bit stressful because of the risk involved with high voltage and just the frustration in the troubleshooting phase, along with the investment of money and time. I built the eyelet boards from laminate and sourced all the parts from various suppliers. By doing this I learned a ton, but just buying a kit would have been much easier.
I am incredibly glad I built them, and they work very well thanks to some help from the forum. I could not justify the investment for another amp project, but I caught the bug. I was thinking about building a pedal and I discovered the Fetzer Valve stuff. I started to wonder how close can you get to the old tube sound? I can say that pairing this basic concept, a well designed SS preamp with a class D power amp does get you in the ballpark. It is close enough for jazz if you will. This project was whimsical and just fun! I am already planning my next build. I used eyelets, because that is what I learned on and I like the look.
I think I meant point to point wiring really.
Are you asking about PCB traces compared to hookup wire? If so... both are just usually lengths of copper. In either case, the amount of copper used determines the current rating.On the topic of PCBs. Is the connection superior to the solder/wire?
I know there has been discussions about wire/gage/solid/stranded. And I guess the answer I perceived was that it matters what it's connecting to, or what amps/volts are flowing throw the wires.
So the length of the copper run would be less on PCB?both are just usually lengths of copper. In either case, the amount of copper used determines the current rating.
In both cases the connection is copper being joined by solder. At audio frequencies wire is wire pretty much wire as far as the signal is concerned (as long as it's big enough as noted above). Big enough can either be a matter of increasing current handling or reducing resistance (material in some aspects of the power supply). But layout is important (and critical in a few key areas). Hard to move traces around and see if it improves noise. Typically that is all worked out in the prototyping phase for a PCB (at least you would like to believe it is) because there ain't a lot you can do after the fact. Ease of handling is important. Suitability of the insulation for the voltage is important. It matters what you like to work with and what longevity you want out of it.On the topic of PCBs. Is the connection superior to the solder/wire?
I know there has been discussions about wire/gage/solid/stranded. And I guess the answer I perceived was that it matters what it's connecting to, or what amps/volts are flowing throw the wires.