bridge saddles, let 'em touch or not?

  • Thread starter fink
  • Start date
  • This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links like Ebay, Amazon, and others.

fink

Tele-Meister
Joined
Sep 22, 2003
Posts
127
You can let 'em touch each other, or you can take a pick and spread them out a smidge. Any difference?

just curious,
-dan
 

jay_mci

Tele-Meister
Joined
May 2, 2010
Posts
283
Location
Indiana
I don't see why it would matter all it would change is string spacing and not much.
 

yonie

Tele-Meister
Joined
Oct 10, 2009
Posts
438
Age
43
Location
Netherlands
I could imagine the vibration passing onto the other saddles (and then the strings) instead of to the bridgeplate. So i would say hypothetically it would be better to have them seperated. But I'm not expert at this.
 

Guitartom_ca

Tele-Holic
Joined
Aug 13, 2007
Posts
781
Age
50
Location
Canada
i dont think it will make much difference. callaham saddles are made not to touch. glendale saddles are purposely made to touch. I think i like them better touching because the saddles wont move when you do string bends.
 

nadzab

Friend of Leo's
Joined
Mar 23, 2009
Posts
2,225
Location
New England
I always give them a quick squeeze together after a string change, then forget about it. If it makes a difference, I'll be a monkey's uncle.
 

rushcentrale

TDPRI Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2008
Posts
48
Location
Los Angeles, CA
off the top of my head i think the saddles touching are theoretically supposed to give you more coupling and sustain. the theory behind them not touching is to get rid of unwanted harmonics. i use the glendales myself, but i'm sure i wouldn't be able to hear the difference between touching or non-touching saddles.
 

Sea Devil

Friend of Leo's
Joined
Sep 23, 2006
Posts
4,866
Age
62
Location
Brooklyn, NY
It really only matters if there's a rattle when they touch. Then you can either jam 'em together tighter or pull them apart. Sometimes you get nice sympathetic vibrations from the other strings when they touch, sometimes ugly sounds similar to the "wolf tones" you get when the pickups are too high.

The issue is much more important with a Jaguar/Jazzmaster bridge, for all the same reasons. Every guitar and every set of strings reacts differently, so there's no set rule.
 

boris bubbanov

Tele Axpert
Ad Free Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2007
Posts
60,084
Location
New Orleans, LA + in the
I like the "apart" kind because they are easier to manipulate and can be used in a wider variety of applications. If there's a tonal difference I'll be darned if I can quantify it. And I feel most confident that a large factor in why the 6 "hammer" barrel saddles on the MIM Deluxe Nashvilles and Standard James Burton Teles have issues is that crowding leads to saddles pushing other saddles out of position and uneven amounts of down pressure on each of the saddle height screws.
 

Powers

Tele-Meister
Joined
Apr 12, 2009
Posts
203
Location
Dallas, TX
Some G&L ASATs (the specials and z-3s, I think?) have those (link removed)that have a screw on the side, so tightening it pushes the saddles together, and they resonate with the bridge as one mass.

Might be an apples-to-oranges comparison on account of the design, but I hear great things about that bridge on G&Ls. I can only assume you would be getting part way there by keeping your saddles snug on a more "traditional" tele bridge!
 
Top