Boss Blues Driver History

  • Thread starter JoshuaCLS
  • Start date
  • This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links like Ebay, Amazon, and others.

JoshuaCLS

Tele-Afflicted
Joined
May 22, 2011
Posts
1,000
Location
Panama City, FL
I picked one up off of Craigslist yesterday for cheap.

I've owned it before, but never with this amp/guitar combo.
I loved it stock! Very amp like.

My question is,
What is the history of this circuit?

In a world where everything seems like a variant of a few of the basic circuits,
Where does this fall compared to a tubescreamer or a blues breaker?

Not speaking sonically, but circuit wise?
Is there anything else like this, or an "original"?

Hard a hard time finding much on it.
 

djalt

Tele-Afflicted
Joined
Aug 23, 2010
Posts
1,004
Location
canada
Somewhat nebulous, YMMV,.......

From THE BOSS BOOK, an interview with Yasuyuki Yamada of the Roland Corporation Development Department:

"We decided on the name Blues Driver first, and then started on development. We were after a new crunch-like distortion. If you distort using the amp and turn the guitar volume down, you can get a clean sound. This was the idea, and the BD-2 was the first effect that allowed you to control the distortion using the volume control on the guitar. It has the same feel as the analog version of amp simulation. The circuit is completely different from circuits up until then because it represented a completely different dirrection.

"In the case of distortion and over drive, in general, when you turn down the guitar volume it effects the filters in the circuit, and the sound gets a little muddy -this is a weakness of distortion and over drive. On the other hand, when you increase the volume, you get a great sound. With the BD-2 and the BOSS COSM amp modeling, you get a crunch-like sound from the amp distortion even when you turn the guitar volume down."
 

Chiogtr4x

Telefied
Ad Free Member
Joined
Mar 29, 2007
Posts
20,375
Location
Manassas Park, VA
Despite the fact that the text above comes directly from Boss (the source/designer of the BD-2) I kind of take issue with the "crunch" characterization of the Blues Driver. Maybe that refers to the sound at higher Gain settings, but the author kind of glides over how nice of a lighter natural breakup you get from the pedal at low Gain, IMO it's 2nd best feature.

Thankfully it does mention guitar volume cleanup, which this pedal does, like no other OD I have ever used- some folks claim cleanup (you get this all the time on demos, where pedal X claims 'cleanup' but it's just volume reduction, the distortion is still there..)

I can take my stock BD-2, put the Tone at 11:00 the other two controls at NOON, and just leave it ON for great clean>dirty tone from the guitar; it's a great OD. I dial enough amp volume (clean Fender) so that I get enough rhythm volume with guitar volume 1/2 the way UP, an then turn it up for OD. Dynamic indeed!
 

Wrong-Note Rod

Poster Extraordinaire
Joined
Mar 4, 2009
Posts
6,296
Location
atlanta
I always use one as a solo boost. It works well with an already over-driven sound, or a clean sound. Its one of the few pedals I've ever found, that works well in both applications.

So the gain is usually set fairly low for me, and the level up a bit. Tone knob to taste, altho, it does seem to add a bit of mids, which is perfect for solos anyway.

Great pedal, I've got two.
 

jglenn

Tele-Afflicted
Joined
Feb 26, 2010
Posts
1,407
Location
everett wa
I owned the Keely version for 5 years,and mostly would leave it on all night and adjust volume and drive from the guitar,became an extension of my amp,very usefull for the styles I play.Sold it to get a Lollar P90 last month,will by another when I start to gig again.
 

11 Gauge

Doctor of Teleocity
Joined
Mar 21, 2003
Posts
13,921
Location
Near BWI Int'l
Thankfully it does mention guitar volume cleanup, which this pedal does, like no other OD I have ever used- some folks claim cleanup (you get this all the time on demos, where pedal X claims 'cleanup' but it's just volume reduction, the distortion is still there..)

This may have been a big deal back when Boss rolled out the BD-2 years ago, but cleanup sans distortion isn't such a big deal to achieve any longer (IMO) - even with older Boss pedals! Case in point - I can alter the DS-1 to give it stellar cleanup. In some of my experiments, the cleanup was "too good," at least for a so-so player like myself (revealed too much of my ham-fisted clinks when playing).

I'd still argue that Boss' marketing missed the mark, and the "crunch term" is further proof of that.

The circuit complexity with the BD-2 is not necessary for "warm boost with just a touch of hair." Even the OD-3 is overly complex if that's all you want.

What separates the OD-2/BD-2/OD-3 apart from almost every other OD pedal out there (that I am familiar with) is the use of something called a "differential amplifier" - an op amp is a "scaled up and perfected" version of a differential, in many respects. But it's sort of a problem WRT a guitarist's uses. The amplitude gain is typically very large, and the op amp doesn't "impart any of the good stuff" to the overdriven sound in most cases.

...A differential amplifier uses a "back to back" arrangement of two transistors - one gets the "inverting input," and the other gets the standard "non-inverting input," just like an op amp. There is also a PNP bipolar transistor to "tie things together."

I realize that's getting a bit tech'ish, but the reason I bring it up is why go to all that trouble with such a complex circuit? Because when the differentials clip, they do so asymmetrically. This is due to the amplitude limitations of the positive and negative regions of the signal not being able to "properly reflect each other."

...And using jFET's means that you have a good input impedance as well.

Using unsorted jFET's in a class A configuration isn't a typically feasible option with a mass produced pedal. The circuitry has to be bolstered to get the singular transistor to "autobias," or the transistors have to be sorted and measured so that they will correctly bias up with a "hardwired" circuit, or there has to be a provision (trimpot) for measuring and setting bias.

...The "answer" is to either use something like the Orman minibooster as a modular piece of the OD circuit, or something like the differential works well, but with MORE circuit complexity. Hence the BSIABII using the minibooster building block.

IDK if you recall a thread from many years ago where folks were snipping the "last two" diodes out of the OD-3 for "better performance," but one of the side effects was the buzzy/fizzy thing that the BD-2 does when you breach a certain point of gain. Gee, I wonder why? ;)

I'd argue that the "normal" mode on the OD-2 followed by the cheap clean boost of your choice would probably give even more flexible performance than the BD-2. What would actually be COOL would be the OD-2 going into a Seymour Duncan Pickup Booster, since it uses a bipolar differential.

Sorry for the verbose/tech-speak stuff. I LOVE that Boss has used the differential circuit as they have. Prior to them, the only fairly common/popular application of the differential that I'm personally aware of is a bipolar arrangement in an old fuzz pedal - a buzzy one. Drawing a blank as to which one, but it's spaghetti western city... :lol:
 

Chiogtr4x

Telefied
Ad Free Member
Joined
Mar 29, 2007
Posts
20,375
Location
Manassas Park, VA
^^ I think you may have explained to me and others (a few times over the years now, ha!) that the 'slight breakup tone' that I like from a Blues Driver, is when the Gain is so low, that the distortion circuit hasn't even kicked in yet! (or similar). All I know is that it has it's got a permanent place (not for every... kind of depends on the gig and gear) on my 'dirt mantle' (in my case, a crowded bookcase, sharing space with, guitar mags and classic Jazz CD's!)
 

smoss469

Tele-Afflicted
Joined
Oct 12, 2007
Posts
1,914
Location
West Virginia
I recently picked up 1 cheap and really was blown away by it. I had never even tried one out (Boss Dirt gets a horrible rep outside of 1 or 2 gems). Talk about crazy! Sounded great, especially loved how with the gain dimed it damn near sounded like a wall of fuzz (in a good way).
 

11 Gauge

Doctor of Teleocity
Joined
Mar 21, 2003
Posts
13,921
Location
Near BWI Int'l
^^ I think you may have explained to me and others (a few times over the years now, ha!) that the 'slight breakup tone' that I like from a Blues Driver, is when the Gain is so low, that the distortion circuit hasn't even kicked in yet! (or similar).

Yeah, it's literally just on the cusp...

I would love to take the time to strip the BD-2 down and "perfect it" (from scratch) for the specific application that is so popular - very low gain for that very slight breakup. The BD-2 has TWO of those "differential" amp stages I was referring to, and they are controlled simultaneously by a "dual ganged" pot.

...I really think that just a single differential with some tone shaping, and then fed into a simple boost - even a SHO would probably work to keep the parts count super low - would be exactly what a lot of the "slight breakup" crowd seems to crave. I have no doubt that it would have an advantage over the BD-2, because that would be the absolute intended design - when compromises are eliminated, there always seems to be benefits.

But even a very stripped down BD-2 (I'd have to make this thing from scratch) would still be a pretty involved endeavor. For that reason, I've always been grateful that Boss has supplied great raw materials to work with. I should actually try and hunt down a few OD-2's, and just find the "perfect boost" to run after one.
 

smoss469

Tele-Afflicted
Joined
Oct 12, 2007
Posts
1,914
Location
West Virginia
Boss+BD2+Blues+Driver.png


C'mon... someone knows they want to build it!
 

atreidesheir

TDPRI Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2012
Posts
69
Location
TN
Mark did that vero layout simply by force of will.^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

.11 guage hit the nail on the head. But looking at my BD-2 schem I am struck by the Fender tone stack layout with fixed values for bass and mids.

I wish I had my old one back. I was using it all wrong. even so it sounded decent but just not great.
 

11 Gauge

Doctor of Teleocity
Joined
Mar 21, 2003
Posts
13,921
Location
Near BWI Int'l
C'mon... someone knows they want to build it!

Blech....no thanks!

Great job by Mark though. But it's giving me the willies of when I actually built a variant of the Catalinbread SFT. NINE jFET's crammed in a tiny little pcb space for that one. Never again!

I think it's Tonepad who has a DIY (etch yourself) pcb layout of the BD-2?

Great exercises in getting your chops up at rolling your own, but again - Boss has done the heavy lifting, and used BD-2's are (relatively) cheap and plentiful.
 

cousinpaul

Poster Extraordinaire
Joined
Jun 19, 2009
Posts
5,441
Location
Nashville TN
It's interesting to me that unlike some manufacturers, like Fulltone or Lovepedal, Boss rarely revises it's designs. It's been the DIY community that's taken the BD-2 and others to the next level.
 

J-fish

Tele-Meister
Joined
Jan 1, 2014
Posts
246
Location
Tuscany, Italy
This may have been a big deal back when Boss rolled out the BD-2 years ago, but cleanup sans distortion isn't such a big deal to achieve any longer (IMO) - even with older Boss pedals! Case in point - I can alter the DS-1 to give it stellar cleanup. In some of my experiments, the cleanup was "too good," at least for a so-so player like myself (revealed too much of my ham-fisted clinks when playing).

I'd still argue that Boss' marketing missed the mark, and the "crunch term" is further proof of that.

The circuit complexity with the BD-2 is not necessary for "warm boost with just a touch of hair." Even the OD-3 is overly complex if that's all you want.

What separates the OD-2/BD-2/OD-3 apart from almost every other OD pedal out there (that I am familiar with) is the use of something called a "differential amplifier" - an op amp is a "scaled up and perfected" version of a differential, in many respects. But it's sort of a problem WRT a guitarist's uses. The amplitude gain is typically very large, and the op amp doesn't "impart any of the good stuff" to the overdriven sound in most cases.

...A differential amplifier uses a "back to back" arrangement of two transistors - one gets the "inverting input," and the other gets the standard "non-inverting input," just like an op amp. There is also a PNP bipolar transistor to "tie things together."

I realize that's getting a bit tech'ish, but the reason I bring it up is why go to all that trouble with such a complex circuit? Because when the differentials clip, they do so asymmetrically. This is due to the amplitude limitations of the positive and negative regions of the signal not being able to "properly reflect each other."

...And using jFET's means that you have a good input impedance as well.

Using unsorted jFET's in a class A configuration isn't a typically feasible option with a mass produced pedal. The circuitry has to be bolstered to get the singular transistor to "autobias," or the transistors have to be sorted and measured so that they will correctly bias up with a "hardwired" circuit, or there has to be a provision (trimpot) for measuring and setting bias.

...The "answer" is to either use something like the Orman minibooster as a modular piece of the OD circuit, or something like the differential works well, but with MORE circuit complexity. Hence the BSIABII using the minibooster building block.

IDK if you recall a thread from many years ago where folks were snipping the "last two" diodes out of the OD-3 for "better performance," but one of the side effects was the buzzy/fizzy thing that the BD-2 does when you breach a certain point of gain. Gee, I wonder why? ;)

I'd argue that the "normal" mode on the OD-2 followed by the cheap clean boost of your choice would probably give even more flexible performance than the BD-2. What would actually be COOL would be the OD-2 going into a Seymour Duncan Pickup Booster, since it uses a bipolar differential.

Sorry for the verbose/tech-speak stuff. I LOVE that Boss has used the differential circuit as they have. Prior to them, the only fairly common/popular application of the differential that I'm personally aware of is a bipolar arrangement in an old fuzz pedal - a buzzy one. Drawing a blank as to which one, but it's spaghetti western city... :lol:


Mmmmhh, very interesting!
I'm trying to figure out something about that differential amplifier section;
Imagine to pull out the clipping diodes...
Which transistor is clipping first? Do those PNP bipolar transistor clip any of the signal?
Couldn't it be that PNP transistor be compared, somehow, to this directly coupled cathode follower stage of this distortion channel of the SLO...? https://www.ampbooks.com/mobile/classic-circuits/soldano-slo-preamp-4/

Thank you very much for everything...!
 
Top