Back To The Iridium

Blrfl

Tele-Afflicted
Joined
May 3, 2018
Posts
1,890
Location
Northern Virginia
Any of you guys know, factually, if the iridium has superior dsp?
The chip itself isn't anything to write home about, but the Iridium isn't doing the same amount of work as a full-blown multi-effects unit and doesn't need as much horsepower.

One thing I've observed with modelers in general is that the speaker cabinet model tends to have a lot of impact on how good things sound. Better-quality IRs help a lot. Strymon's in particular are very long for both the speaker and room, so they've clearly figured that devoting resources to that is worthwhile.
 

dspellman1

Tele-Meister
Joined
Feb 3, 2022
Posts
146
Age
73
Location
Los Angeles
The Iridium is a nice piece of gear... and yes, relatively simple to use.

For me though... I still consider my Helix to be the single best gear purchase I've made in 40 years. I've never had an issue creating usable tones on it, and I don't get caught up in menus & options. I guess my brain was wired for how that thing works.
There are just folks who want to turn something on, plug in and play. Simplicity is key.

Like you, I love the Helix and am constantly finding new ways to use it and new sounds to work with. I re-watched Pete Thorn's initial demo of the Helix from about six-seven years ago and found new things to try, and that was just a couple of days ago.
 

Caffiend

TDPRI Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2021
Posts
63
Age
47
Location
Bristol
Also worth considering how things work internally. Eg; the Tonemasters have four DSP cores, 1 dedicated to the amp model itself, 1 to the cab emulation for the DI and 2 for the reverb model.

I've gone the floor modelling route after decades in tube land and ended up with a Tonemaster DR and a big analogue pedal board. It's my happy place. I can totally understand that needing to cover many styles or do quick setup and breakdown would very much favour dropping a floor unit and plugging into it instead 🙂
 

Caevan O'Sh!te

TDPRI Member
Joined
Nov 3, 2008
Posts
25
Location
NW of Watkins Glen, NY, US
I agree, particularly with taking pedals. I wish the ”Round” (deluxe reverb) has a little more sparkle and drive.

I love hitting the Iridium's amp-models with pedals like my Keeley 'Retro Super Germanium Phat Mod' or Fulltone CS Ranger (germanium Dallas Rangemaster Treble Booster based). Either of those'll get you a little more sparkle and drive- with plenty more on-tap! The Iridium gets along VERY well with them!
 

Attachments

  • Keeley Retro Super High Gain Germanium Phat Mod on Reverb.jpg
    Keeley Retro Super High Gain Germanium Phat Mod on Reverb.jpg
    150.1 KB · Views: 2
  • Fulltone CS-Ranger.png
    Fulltone CS-Ranger.png
    253.1 KB · Views: 5

burntfrijoles

Poster Extraordinaire
Joined
Feb 12, 2010
Posts
9,125
Location
Somewhere Over The Rainbow
I love hitting the Iridium's amp-models with pedals…….. The Iridium gets along VERY well with them!
Oh I agree totally. I goose mine with a Mythos Mjolnir or my KOT. I just think the Round model on the Iridium should have more native drive.
Regardless, I’ve decided against the new UAFX pedals for now. I almost let the hype seduce me. I’m sticking with the Iridium.
 

bigjohnbates

Tele-Meister
Joined
Sep 25, 2015
Posts
130
Location
Vancouver, BC
i like the idea of simplicity as well, i kept the 3 pedals i need to get my basic tone out of any amp for backup. But after finding the HX Stomp equivalent of each of my other pedals (and the big 3) i sold the rest. The Stomp XL is a cleaner setup and tonally so close that i cant tell. Except when the Stomp is actually better.

That said it took me months to sort it out and the IRs i downloaded were the gamechanger. I would not have been satisfied without them. That said i am still tweaking my favourite 4 basic sounds a little bit whenever i play...
 

teletimetx

Doctor of Teleocity
Joined
Jul 25, 2011
Posts
14,720
Location
Frontrangia CO
Oh I agree totally. I goose mine with a Mythos Mjolnir or my KOT. I just think the Round model on the Iridium should have more native drive.
Regardless, I’ve decided against the new UAFX pedals for now. I almost let the hype seduce me. I’m sticking with the Iridium.

Hey, frijoles! I get the convenience of going direct to PA from the Iridium. For the majority of gigs I’ve done/will do, l only bring along the tubes for my pleasure; only a tiny, tiny percent of audience care a whiff or perceive any difference. It’s for me…

But at home, what speaker out put do you run the Iridium into? I have speaker cabs for guitar amps, but those run at guitar amp level and use speaker cable input.

Asking for a friend…I love hauling my ‘70 Bassman head with 2x15 cab to gigs, but also, perhaps I am old and such…
 

burntfrijoles

Poster Extraordinaire
Joined
Feb 12, 2010
Posts
9,125
Location
Somewhere Over The Rainbow
But at home, what speaker out put do you run the Iridium into?
I actually only use it for DI recording directly into my interface (Focusrite Scarleett 212) feeding Logic. As a result I only hear it through my monitors (Yamaha HS50) or the interface's headphones. I haven't even considered obtaining any FRFR speakers or similar.
I am going to upgrade my studio monitors but it won't be a big upgrade so the woofers will likely 8" at most.
I spent more time with in the last few days trying to dial in some tones. I finally created a "favorite". It gives me exactly what I need, a great clean to edge of breakup tone and a platform my pedals. I have also found some very good settings for the Chime model. I am still playing with the Punch (Marshall) model. Honestly, using a DLS pedal with in my Favorite setting gives me all the Marshall I need.
I have concluded that the UAFX are unnecessary because the Iridium more than sufficient for my humble needs.
 

Caevan O'Sh!te

TDPRI Member
Joined
Nov 3, 2008
Posts
25
Location
NW of Watkins Glen, NY, US
I’ve decided against the new UAFX pedals for now. I almost let the hype seduce me. I’m sticking with the Iridium.

I have concluded that the UAFX are unnecessary because the Iridium more than sufficient for my humble needs.

Honestly, when I listened to a few demo videos, I didn't like them as much as the Iridium...

Oh I agree totally. I goose mine with a Mythos Mjolnir or my KOT. I just think the Round model on the Iridium should have more native drive.

I noticed only very recently, that Strymon states that they based the Iridium's "Round"/Fender model specifically on the Normal Channel of '60s Fender Deluxe Reverb amps...

Strymon: "We chose the Deluxe’s Normal channel for its round tone that plays well with pedals."

That may at least partially explain a perceivable need for more sparkle and drive!
 
Last edited:

burntfrijoles

Poster Extraordinaire
Joined
Feb 12, 2010
Posts
9,125
Location
Somewhere Over The Rainbow
Strymon states that they based the Iridium's "Round"/Fender model specifically on the Normal Channel of '60s Fender Deluxe Reverb amps...

Strymon: "We chose the Deluxe’s Normal channel for its round tone that plays well with pedals."

Thanks. That makes sense. Like I said, I'm okay with it now. I've got a Round model tweaked for my stored "Fav" setting. It's great for everything and works extremely well with my drive pedals. I've also found several good settings for the Chime model. I just need to find a couple of good settings for the Punch model and I'm set.
I'm still intrigued by the UAFX pedals but not nearly as much as I was. Sometime I think we're splitting hairs in search of our "ideal" tones.
 

gonzo

TDPRI Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2009
Posts
81
Location
salt lake city utah
i've done an entire album using NOTHING but the Iridium
for all guitars,
and bass.

a wonderful recording tool,
i also have it setup to drive the front end of a '82 Mesa boogie Mark IIb head and various cabs...
that, is a wonderful sound... using the marshall superlead, thru a NULL IR, and into the boogie running 6l6's...
very cool.
 




Top