94 Twin Amp reverb pan suggestions

I have a 94 twin amp, the one with 2 inputs and no tremolo. This model is confusing, since there are several iterations of this amp. I'm presently trying the standard Fender reverb pan the 4AB3C1b. it seems to work ok, but the sound is different, good reverb but fast decay. When used in my 74 silver faced twin it sound just right, it has a much nicer reverb and decay. The Part number in the service manual for the 94 Twin Amp shows P/N 064063. I made a few calls on this part number, but no one was sure which pan I'm looking for any ideas, thanks in advance.

 

Thank you 24 track for looking. Funny I did that also and got nothing. I'm using that pan presently, its kind of dry in that amp. I wonder if there is another substitute for something with a longer decay and reverb. I didn't really want to get into moding the existing circuit since its a PC board. thanks Again for the info

 

Hi schmee: I reinstalled the 4AB3C1B back in my silver face Twin Reverb and the pan sounds very good. I'll have to try some different tubes to see if that makes a difference. My Guess its probably the circuit design of that amp. That part I'll really have to look into, since its a PC board design. I'm not looking forward trying to disassemble. I might just order a 9A3B MOD tank to try, my cost is about $ 18.00.

 

Schmee, its similar to the red know, its referred to as the 94 twin amp, several iterations, min has to input jacks and no tremolo.

 

Hi Schmee: Do you think this will work in place of the 4AB3C1B: 8 ohm in and 2250 out

• Replaces: 9AB3C1B
• Solid, sturdy construction
• Type: Long (3 Spring) tank
• Decay: long decay
• Input: 10 Ω
• Output: 2,575 Ω
• Connectors: Input insulated/output grounded

Thanks for your advice, Bob

 

Schmee: I was just looking at the Video from CE distribution, according to them it should work, here is the link to the video.

https://www.cedist.com/tech-corner/spring-reverb-tanks-explained-and-compared-videos

look at the 2 vs 3 spring comparison video