Well I finally broke down and went with the wife to see The Avengers: infinity war last night. It raised a few questions that I have thought about in the past, but just never really found answers to. First off, I understand that Thanos beats up on the Hulk because he is a far superior fighter, but to make him appear physically stronger/more capable? So I continued searching around this morning for some other opinions, and apparently Stan Lee himself claims even Thor is physically stronger than hulk... Despite the fact that Thor can wield lightning, fly, has super endurance, and practical invulnerability due to being a god... What is the only thing Hulk has? Strength, regeneration, and major durability... that's it... So that begs the question what is the point of the Hulks continued existence? Same goes for the DC universe.... Superman is just as fast if not faster than the flash, with a plethora of other major powers and abilities so what is the Flashs reason for even existing? Why do writers keep undermining heroes to the point that they are useless? I mean Flash in DC should be the fastest period because that's ALL he does... HULK should be the physically Strongest because it's essentially ALL he has... Otherwise what is the point? It's like hey these guys have Superior strength, superior speed, energy projection, and a vast array of other powers... But then others just get one of those that is not even as good? When Icons become filler in a hotdog... The whole Justice league movie was trash... hey everyone please be depicted as weak as possible so only superman can save the day, and render everyone else pointless. I'm about to cut up my nerd card and throw it in the trash!