Asher Guitars WD Music Products Amplified Parts Mod Kits DIY Nordstarnd Pickups Warmoth.com Reiland Pickups
Asher Guitars WD Music Products Amplified Parts Mod Kits DIY Nordstarnd Pickups Warmoth.com Reilander Pickups
Asher Guitars WD Music Products Amplified Parts Mod Kits DIY Nordstarnd Pickups Warmoth.com Reilander Pickups
Join TDPRI Today

JA90 or MP thinline?

Discussion in 'Welcome Wagon' started by Andy.j.ford, Feb 9, 2013.

  1. Andy.j.ford

    Andy.j.ford TDPRI Member

    Posts:
    5
    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2013
    Location:
    Solihull uk
    Hi all.. I have a mim 72 custom reissue (which I can't get enough of) and a mik 90's squier tele (which never gets used).

    I've recently messed up my left shoulder snowboarding so I'm looking for something lighter..

    I've been looking at the jim Adkins JA90 or the modern player thinline as they will be lighter and the p90's will give me something a little different to my other tele's..

    Is the JA90 worth the extra cash?

    Welcome any thoughts.
     
  2. furtherpale

    furtherpale Former Member

    Posts:
    1,133
    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2012
    Location:
    Melbourne - 32
    Bump as I've been considering one (mp)
     
  3. Telenator

    Telenator Doctor of Teleocity Vendor Member

    Posts:
    12,816
    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2005
    Location:
    Connecticut
    Be careful in selecting a "light" guitar as they often tend to be neck-heavy.

    Make sure you have the opportunity to play the potential new guitar while standing and using a strap.

    Heavy guitars can be a bit uncomfortable on your shoulder, but neck-heavy guitars are much more difficult to play.
     
  4. Forum Sponsor Sponsored posting

  5. telex76

    telex76 Doctor of Teleocity

    Age:
    65
    Posts:
    15,215
    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2006
    Location:
    Fort Worth,Tx.
  6. Blustele

    Blustele Tele-Afflicted

    Posts:
    1,387
    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2012
    Location:
    NC
  7. TX-Cabronita

    TX-Cabronita TDPRI Member

    Posts:
    5
    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2013
    Location:
    California
    I have to agree, play it, standing w/strap. Maybe consider also the other MP Fender Tele with the toggle switch? It's made out if pine? MIChina, but for $350, not too shabby.
     
  8. electrablue

    electrablue Poster Extraordinaire

    Posts:
    5,432
    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2004
    Location:
    North Carolina
  9. FrankJames

    FrankJames Poster Extraordinaire

    Age:
    69
    Posts:
    7,748
    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2008
    Location:
    Ohio, USA
    Welcome to the forum !!
     
  10. Davecoleaus

    Davecoleaus TDPRI Member

    Posts:
    22
    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2013
    Location:
    Syndey, NSW, Australia
    Hi Andy,
    I will preface this by saying i am an average player, and i am by no means an expert, so this is purely my opinion. I just bought my first telecaster today (mim standard), but I did a huge amount of research and tried out pretty much every bottom end telecaster to find something that i liked.
    I was agonising over what model to get, because I have a Gibson LP that is my workhorse, but I was looking for something a little bit different and I fell in love with the shape of the telecaster. In my search I tried out both models that you are looking at, along with several others.
    My thoughts:
    The modern player plus which someone else mentioned was very versatile in terms of sound, was well made and I love the coil tap for modding potential, but it weighs more than my les Paul, so I wouldn't recommend it with your shoulder.
    The thinline modern player: I liked the finish A LOT more in person than I did in the photos. Under full stage lights it does look more brown, but under regular lighting it is more black. I couldn't fault the finish and the neck felt comfortable. It was really nice and light. The pickups also noise cancel in the middle position which i liked. they will pick up a lot of noise in certain environments though.
    My issues with it: there was a fair bit of fret buzz which I didn't find in any of the other fenders that I tried out. That might be fixed with a set up, but I've read a few reviews that mentioned not being able to fix that properly. The pickups are also epically muddy. I loved the sound of the bridge pickup, but the middle position and the straight neck were just unusably muddy. When strumming there was no clarity whatsoever on the top end, to the point that it would only be good for lead use. I've read that this can be fixed with changed pots and tweaking of pickup height, but it depends on whether you want to go to the effort. The tuners felt a little bit cheap, which I would replace. I was also a little bit worried that the pickup selector was crackling when changing positions, and that made me worry what the rest of the electrics would be like.

    The jim Adkins ja90: I'm a big fan of the jimmy eat world sound, so I was really looking forward to trying this bad boy out. What I liked: The sounds were great straight off the bat. I didn't feel like it would need extensive setting up, tweaking or modding. The bridge pickup had a great rock tone that was a bit hotter than a bucker. I was a bit surprised that I couldn't get a more in your face tone out of this guitar, but the neck would be sweet for a mellow kinda blues tone. The finish was impeccable, and the neck joint was flawless. Neck was great to play on, tuners felt solid, and the tones were good. You also have three finishes to choose from which I think are all good choices (but the black looks HOT). I think the reason why I didn't go with this model and bought a standard was that it was just a very Gibson kind of sound (I don't know if that's sacrilege to say?). I wanted the telecaster sound because I already have a great Gibson. For you though maybe already having a telecaster sound, the Gibson sound might be a nice change?
    The bottom line of a ranting post. If you want to mod the guitar, and don't care about changing pots and wiring and pickups, I would maybe go for the modern player thinline? Any money you save could go back into the guitar. It's a solid wood, and it played well, but I would definitely play before you buy to see that there is no fret buzz. I would be a bit worried if there was when you tried it out.
    If you want a no effort, great sound, and you don't mind the cost difference, I would maybe go with the ja90. It sounds great, even if not a traditional tele sound, and I got a better feel about the build quality (but that was from a brief time with it in store).
    As I said, my opinion, take it or leave it. I've been playing for years but am new to telecasters so probably don't know the subtlety that the more experienced members on here know about :)
     
  11. Andy.j.ford

    Andy.j.ford TDPRI Member

    Posts:
    5
    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2013
    Location:
    Solihull uk
    Thanks for the responses, I tried both the mp and the ja90 in my local store and decided the ja90 was the one for me.. I liked the set neck and the p90s gave me a new sound (albeit very gibsonesque).
     
  12. Andy.j.ford

    Andy.j.ford TDPRI Member

    Posts:
    5
    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2013
    Location:
    Solihull uk
    Pics

    Pics of the new and old telecasters
     

    Attached Files:

  13. Blustele

    Blustele Tele-Afflicted

    Posts:
    1,387
    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2012
    Location:
    NC
    Nice trio there, Grats!
     
  14. nrand

    nrand Friend of Leo's

    Posts:
    2,389
    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2009
    Location:
    South Australia
    Welcome
    That thinline would be the first one I'd pick up
     
IMPORTANT: Treat everyone here with respect, no matter how difficult!
No sex, drug, political, religion or hate discussion permitted here.


Share This Page