Asher Guitars WD Music Products Amplified Parts Mod Kits DIY Nordstarnd Pickups Warmoth.com Reiland Pickups
Asher Guitars WD Music Products Amplified Parts Mod Kits DIY Nordstarnd Pickups Warmoth.com Reilander Pickups
Asher Guitars WD Music Products Amplified Parts Mod Kits DIY Nordstarnd Pickups Warmoth.com Reilander Pickups
Join TDPRI Today

BRUCE SPRINGSTEEN esquire mistery

Discussion in 'Telecaster Discussion Forum' started by Andromeda1968, Nov 14, 2005.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Andromeda1968

    Andromeda1968 Tele-Meister

    Posts:
    134
    Joined:
    May 16, 2003
    Location:
    Milan Italy
    The mistery of the esquire fender springsteen's guitar now is revealed...
    Bruce said that your guitar is a Telecaster build from 2 pieces
    one fender esquire neck and an another body of a telecaster...

    said this in the dvd 30th anniversary for Born to run...

    decal incorrect place?
    body 53???

    now the truth is out there

    ;)
     
  2. Fuzzyhead

    Fuzzyhead Tele-Afflicted

    Posts:
    1,349
    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2005
    Location:
    Bonn (Yer-up)
  3. tweed

    tweed TDPRI Member

    Posts:
    22
    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2005
    Location:
    Kauniainen, Finland
  4. Forum Sponsor Sponsored posting

  5. Andromeda1968

    Andromeda1968 Tele-Meister

    Posts:
    134
    Joined:
    May 16, 2003
    Location:
    Milan Italy
    yes...
    His guitar is:

    fender Esquire neck circa 1958-60
    Fennder Telecaster body refinished circa 60's-70's
     
  6. Fuzzyhead

    Fuzzyhead Tele-Afflicted

    Posts:
    1,349
    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2005
    Location:
    Bonn (Yer-up)
    Could be. I got it from the pre-release podcast.
     
  7. DavidE

    DavidE Tele-Meister

    Posts:
    159
    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2005
    Bruce Springsteen's Guitar

    This was a great clip from Bruce. He's always been rather ambiguous about this guitar which has lead to so much confusion over time. I've even spent years talking with the guy who sold it to him and never got much cleared up there either. I never understood all the claims about a "mis-placed decal" and whatnot. Every single detail about the neck suggests it's a '57. The body is harder to say, but given that it's ash I would put it pre-59 or '60. The guitar is clearly a mutt though. If you look very carefully at the cover of BTR you can spot a "Pat. Des." Bridge plate with the particularly long saddle adj. screws found only in '59 or so. However, I've seen earlier pics of the guitar with brass saddles, so who knows?

    There are lots of stories about a serial # with an "asterick" and the guitar originally being sold as a "second". Well, it's very widely known that Fender never sold "seconds" as Gibson did. Why would they? A defective neck or body could simply be swapped for another. If the "asterick" existed it was probably something assigned by a pawn shop somewhare along the way, or by Columbia Records who supposedly owned the guitar before Bruce. That's according to the guy who sold it to him. I've since heard Bruce say he "knew the guy who owned it before he did" so that conflicts.

    Anyway, I've spent a lot of time trying to figure this guitar out and that's my two-cents worth. Thanks,
    David


     
  8. Dave Yeats

    Dave Yeats Tele-Holic

    Age:
    41
    Posts:
    851
    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2003
    Location:
    Austin, Texas, USA
    I only listened to the clip once (several days ago), but it seems like Bruce is referring to the fact that the body has a neck pickup route to assert that it is a "telecaster" rather than an "esquire" body. However, both bodies had the route, and once somebody mounted a neck pickup in an "esquire" body, there is no way to tell the difference. Bob K. (does he still post here?) was our resident expert on Springsteen. Bob K? Can you clear this up?

    By all accounts, Bruce's guitar is a highly modified instrument, and is mostly cool because Bruce plays it (not because it is a "vintage collector's item"). As a collectible guitar on its own (without the assocaition with Bruce), it isn't much.
     
  9. DavidE

    DavidE Tele-Meister

    Posts:
    159
    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2005
    That's a good point Dave about the Tele/Esquire reference Bruce made. According to Phil Petillo (the guy who sold it to him and does all the work on it) there's a route under the guard large enough to park a small Buick in. Having never seen the guitar in person I can't say, but I doubt the original neck pu route is "in tact". Apparantly there were once two complete sets of pickups in there (thus the extra jack hole now plugged). And I guess at various times there have been active pu electronics and other things stashed in there as well. Tell you what though, I would love to get my hands on this thing one day!

    David
     
  10. Fuzzyhead

    Fuzzyhead Tele-Afflicted

    Posts:
    1,349
    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2005
    Location:
    Bonn (Yer-up)
    That's exactly what I think is cool about it! A player's guitar is much cooler than anything locked in a closet for fifty years. I like it when they tell stories just with their scars.
     
  11. Fuzzyhead

    Fuzzyhead Tele-Afflicted

    Posts:
    1,349
    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2005
    Location:
    Bonn (Yer-up)
    Just look at the weird stuff he's got going there on the BTR cover...

    If you ever do get your hands on that guitar, you gotta promise me that I can play it one day. Only once... Whoever you are, my friend.
     
  12. GuitarJonz

    GuitarJonz Poster Extraordinaire

    Posts:
    5,051
    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2003
    Location:
    Central Mass.
    Where is bobk when you need him??

    bobk, a TDPer of long standing, knows alot about that tele, and about Petillo, the guy who worked on it. Maybe he'll chime in here.
     
  13. Fuzzyhead

    Fuzzyhead Tele-Afflicted

    Posts:
    1,349
    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2005
    Location:
    Bonn (Yer-up)
    That would be great. But then: I am just obsessed!
     
  14. Dave Yeats

    Dave Yeats Tele-Holic

    Age:
    41
    Posts:
    851
    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2003
    Location:
    Austin, Texas, USA
    It makes me think that there's no way to know, then, if it was an Esquire or Tele body originally. Here's a thought, though: I wonder if (because of the route issue) Bruce found a Telecaster body to mate his original Esquire neck to? It seems to me (in pictures, at least) that the guitar changes quite a bit over the years. Why not a new body? Just guessing here. Bobk should be along anytime now to clear this all up....
     
  15. Dave Yeats

    Dave Yeats Tele-Holic

    Age:
    41
    Posts:
    851
    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2003
    Location:
    Austin, Texas, USA
  16. DavidE

    DavidE Tele-Meister

    Posts:
    159
    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2005
    Well, I dunno. As someone mentioned once before about (something else) this topic could be debated forever.

    I interviewed Petillo once about ten years ago for an article about Bruce's guitar - being as obsessed as I was about it this seemed like a good way to get information. According to him, he sold Bruce the guitar in about 1971. This pretty well coincides with the earliest pics I've seen of it. The earliest of which shows a tortiseshell guard which pre-dated either of the two different hand stenciled black pgs he used (the later of which graces the guitar on the BTR cover). The guitar was also fitted with Gibson tuning machines at the time like you would have found on a Les Paul (Klusons with plastic knobs) Phil claimed he had the original bridge but could never "find it".

    You could spend a short lifetime chronicaling all of the changes this guitar has undergone (and I have!) but suffice to say it's changed to suit Bruce's tastes at any given point. Lots of different pickups, knobs, several jack plates, etc. By the way, the knobs on the BTR album are '57-'58 as well. Lots of things sort of point to '57 like the neck and the re-curve radius of the body as it hits the 17th fret. That radius was changed from 1/4" to 3/8" starting in around '57, and the Bruce guitar definitely shows the later radius.

    Anyway, I could talk about this thing forever so somebody just stop me. And if anyone has a "secret stash" of pics or something please get in touch.

    Thanks,
    David
     
  17. Fuzzyhead

    Fuzzyhead Tele-Afflicted

    Posts:
    1,349
    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2005
    Location:
    Bonn (Yer-up)
    No way. At the very least I found someone as obsessed as I am! :D
     
  18. Rusty

    Rusty Tele-Holic

    Posts:
    564
    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2003
    Location:
    Bridge p/u
    me too!

    great thread guys! i just haven't had anything to add, but i've got a bruce tele project going at the moment. my favorite look has always been that ol' natural worn tele. i've got a brian poe body in the works and piecing everything else together as i get the money, BUT hopefully by summer, i'll have it done!!! it won't be a relic YET, but i'll make it earn its scars the right way ;)

    bobk is a heck of a resource and i apprecate david's info as well...let me know if you get a hold of that stash of pic's :)
     
  19. kaibu49

    kaibu49 Tele-Meister

    Posts:
    387
    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2004
    I can't add a thing either but I'm glad I finally read this thread!

    A friend gave me a copy of Uncut, a music mag out of England I think, Bruce is on the cover.

    Anyway I was looking at the pics in there, extras from the BTR photo shoot and every one of his tele had this "thing" on the pickguard and I became obsessed with it....you've helped me 8)
     
  20. Fuzzyhead

    Fuzzyhead Tele-Afflicted

    Posts:
    1,349
    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2005
    Location:
    Bonn (Yer-up)
    Hey Rusty! Be sure to post some nice big pictures, when you're finished! I think it's the right decision not to relic it beforehand. That wear on Bruce's guitar would be very hard to recreate I guess. Not like for example Roy Buchanan's "Nancy", I've seen some very good replicas of that. But then: I've never seen the original close up.
     
  21. JamesVRoy

    JamesVRoy Tele-Holic

    Posts:
    833
    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2005
    Location:
    Mingya Valley
    This is some of the stuff BobK wrote about awhile back in another forum. I've talked with him a few times in detail about it but haven't heard from him in a while.

    "the '53 Esquire,guitar was originally sold as "second"....bought by a recording studio and fitted with 4 pickups and 2 output jacks.each track was EQ'd and effected differently,so as to sound like 4 different tracks AND they used to charge the person who was "forced" to use it for the sessions and charge on a per track basis(the fee x 4 ) ....the studio was busted in a payola scandal and was forced to sell all of its guitars...Phil Petillo bought the guitar and several others.he sold it to Bruce in 1969 for
    $185.00!!!!!!it has big rout under the pickguard a lil bigger than two humbuckers......the guitar is fitted with custom wound hot single coil pickups(15k plus for the bridge) and active boost/tone controls.it has an ivory nut,schaller non locking tuners,custom made Petillo aluminum string trees(round),Petillo Precison Frets(triangle shape-space age alloy),Titanium Bridge saddles&screws,Titanium Jack plate,the body is one piece and VERY light..original nitro finish which has turned almost completely gray on the back from sweat.The V shape of the neck extends ALL the way to the neck joint.he sets his action VERY low and strings with .010 guage strings(Petillos own brand-very bright long lasting stainless steel)he uses a Heavy Pick.Ive seen this guitar up close many times...its very resonant acoustically...the other stage guitars he is currentntly using are New Fenders made just before the '99-2000 tour,have Barden pickups and necks reworked to match the profile/feel of the 53 EXACTLY...the Bigsbys were a recent addition,installed by Petillo on 3 guitars"

    http://www.pbase.com/jroy/image/2375659
    http://www.pbase.com/jroy/image/1505248
    http://www.pbase.com/jroy/image/1505248

    Jim
     
IMPORTANT: Treat everyone here with respect, no matter how difficult!
No sex, drug, political, religion or hate discussion permitted here.


Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page