|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||
| Worship Service Players Religious service players discussion forum. Open to all religions. [b]No religious theology discussion, just guitar & playing performance discussion.[/b] |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Holic
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: south carolina
Posts: 556
|
Do I need a Taylor in order to play in Church?
I’ve been playing in the church band for about 4 years now, and for the past three I’ve been playing an Alvarez acoustic electric (AD60CK to be precise).
I’m mostly in the background and turned down in the mix (especially when I play my Tele) but this summer I’m going to be playing at church with a duo or trio. I’ll be the only guitar and we’ll have piano with two female singers. Now that my guitar will be heard in the mix (I’m also running sound I know, I know—I don’t really NEED it; but I figure my wife may be more receptive to the “I’m only buying it because I need it for church” line. Besides, I can tell her I consulted all my guitar-playing friends on the interwebz and they said I need to get one. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Meister
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Saskatoon Canada
Age: 58
Posts: 143
|
Heh Heh just don't fly United with it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5YGc4zOqozo seriously - they are beautiful instruments. Bringing beauty to praise is a good motive. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Afflicted
Join Date: May 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,889
|
I think a great sounding AND playing acoustic guitar is a necessity if you're leading worship in church, but it doesn't have to be a Taylor... unless you're gassing for one!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
TDPRI Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: louisiana
Posts: 27
|
No, you don't NEED one, but do you WANT one? As long as it wouldn't hurt you financially, go for it! I bought a used Taylor 310 and I love it. I put in an L.R. Baggs element active and it's awesome.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
Friend of Leo's
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Charlotte NC
Posts: 3,625
|
Quote:
Uh..oh..watch out for lightening...
__________________
www.tprior.com |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Meister
Join Date: May 2011
Location: springfield, mo
Posts: 100
|
No, you need a Martin.
Seriously though, in context of playing for worship, 'bring your best lamb'. There is nothing wrong with using what you have. However, a better instrument encourages you to play more and better and worship service is important. The kind of service deserves a high quality instrument. I believe there is very good Biblical precedent for playing high quality instruments. See 2 Chron 29 for example. Also, when you are playing for people in a worship service context, it's appropriate to present yourself well. That said, a Japanese Alverez classical is my go-to guitar for playing for the kids in the nursery. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Afflicted
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Hopkinton, MA
Posts: 1,429
|
When I need an acoustic in church, I hit the pedal on my fx that says "acoustic". Or play my Ovation.
Don't tell your wife you "need" it for church. You really don't. Be careful about just saying that you like it or she'll ask if you need it. (been through this.....stay with me). To be honest and yet allow your wife to see your point, you can say "I think this Taylor would sound beautiful in church.....what do you think?" |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
Tele-Holic
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Sacramento, Ca
Age: 27
Posts: 553
|
Seriously though, ALL I SEE are Taylor's in worship. Branch out a bit and rock another sexy looking and sounding guitar
All this is a satire so please no one yell at me! Also... Quote:
Sent from my iPhone using TDPRI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | |
|
Tele-Holic
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: south carolina
Posts: 556
|
Quote:
Plus, she's an accountant, and I make a little money on the side playing weddings. I could also appeal to her financial side by saying "Not only would it sound beautiful in church, but we could write it off as a business expense on our taxes." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Afflicted
|
The 314 is a great guitar for church. I bought a 214 last year (put a K & K in it) and got lots of comments in the improvement in sound over what I was playing. It really encouraged me to play more acoustic. If you can afford the 314 I recommend it.
__________________
. "Something entirely new in the electric Spanish guitar field..." |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) | |
|
Tele-Holic
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: south carolina
Posts: 556
|
Quote:
I told her it was an entry-level model. She said, "Why don't you just hold out and get a nice one." Since then she's kind of gone cold on the idea. In the meantime I've been scouring the interwebz for a used 314ce. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) | |
|
Tele-Holic
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 623
|
Quote:
FWIW For the money Larrivee makes some great acoustics. But so does Gibson! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
Friend of Leo's
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Plymouth Meeting, PA
Posts: 3,745
|
__________________
"Theory only seems like rocket science when you don't know it. Once you understand it, it's more like plumbing!"~John McGann There is no "A" anywhere in Lynyrd Skynyrd. It's S Q U I E R! Not Squire. Look at your guitar! |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) | |
|
Tele-Afflicted
|
Quote:
__________________
. "Something entirely new in the electric Spanish guitar field..." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 (permalink) | |
|
Tele-Holic
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: south carolina
Posts: 556
|
Quote:
Yeah, the 214 is great. I played it next to a 314 but I really liked the 314 better. The 214 neck didn't agree with me like the 314 did. The 314 has a wider neck, is solid wood throughout (the 214 is laminated back and sides) and the 314 has the full ES system, whereas the 214 is a simplified version called ES-T. Like I said, the 214 is great, but I like the 314 better. I've seen a lot of used ones online for around $1,000. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) | |
|
Friend of Leo's
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Charlotte NC
Posts: 3,625
|
Quote:
The Taylor 114/214 series are excellent players and excellent sounding, the reason they have a lower price point is that they are not made in the US. I have had a 114CE and a 214CE, both were excellent players and had great sound, acoustic or plugged in. Are they the same as the 300 series or higher ? No, but they are not supposed to be...different types of wood and construction, but they do play great... Never be afraid to grab one of the 114/214 series guitars if the price is right and condition is right. Don't hold out, buy it play it..re-sell it...upgrade as you go... Go over to Guitar Center, if it is in your area..play every guitar in the $1500 to $2000 range, then play every guitar in the $1000 to $1500 range, then every guitar in the $500 to $1000 range..not the under $300 range...3 different groups..don't mix them yet... start at the top range and work your way down, not from the bottom up....try not to get wrapped up in cosmetic appearance... You will be amazed... The two Taylors, 114/214 regardless of the model# and price , will be leading the pack when you are done...you also may find that the 300 Taylors will own the room for value..I'm not talking about a $1500 Taylor compared to a $3000 Gibson...but for me the $3000 guitars don't do much for me ... Also be aware that most of the guitars in the rooms are strung with heavier strings thant you may use and they may be dead... PS, an entry level guitar is a Breedlove C250..around $500 new ..amazing guitar for the money...but it is less guitar than a 114/214 overall... You may want to consider searching the Guitar Center Used website...if you find an Instrument, ask a million questions, have it sent, if you don't like it you have 30 days full recourse. And finally, if you find a Used Taylor, 300 series and above, pre 2003, it will have the dual Fishman blend system on it, Don't let others tell you the Expression system is a must...that's an old wives tale, they are both excellent systems... whats important is the Instrument...
__________________
www.tprior.com |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 (permalink) | |
|
Tele-Holic
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: south carolina
Posts: 556
|
Quote:
I know what entry level guitar are; I have one. That's a good tip about the guitar center used deals. I like the idea of being able to take it back if I don't like it. The re-sell and upgrade plan sounds cool too; Taylors seem to hold their value pretty well in the used market. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Meister
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Illinois
Posts: 383
|
I play an Alvarez RD20 S12, 12 string in church with a SD Woody in the soundhole thru my pedalboard into the PA. I also run our sound, so how big I wanna be in the mix is up to me. All that being said, how the sound of an acoustic is being reproduced makes a big difference. I also have a ratty old 70 Kay Hummingbird, with a tree trunk of a neck and a Chinese preamp and peizo I installed, and she sounds FINE but I tweak the EQ a bit... I believe just about any flat top mic'ed or peizo, can sound good if you play well and the sound guy is up to the challenge of reproducing what you play. Remember its in your fingers...
__________________
Peace. Back by popular demand... |
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
|
|
IMPORTANT:Treat everyone here with respect, no matter how difficult! No sex, drug, political, religion or hate discussion permitted here.