Telecaster Guitar Forum
IMPORTANT: Treat everyone with respect, no matter how difficult that may be. No hate, politics, religion, sex or drug discussions.
No Commercial Posts: Do not use the TDPRI to buy or sell anything.
Telecaster Guitar Resources Guitar T-shirts
Guitar Tuner
6
E
5
A
4
D
3
G
2
B
1
E
Telecaster Music Shop

Telecaster Guitars at Ebay Musician's Friend Stupid Deal of the Day






Go Back   Telecaster Guitar Forum > Main Telecaster Forum > Telecaster Discussion Forum
Home Forum Resources Shop Gallery Classifieds Reviews Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Telecaster Discussion Forum The world's largest Fender Telecaster Discussion Forum. Please keep discussion limited to Telecaster topics here.

Forum Jump

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old February 12th, 2008, 12:31 AM   #1 (permalink)
NEW MEMBER!
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Nebraska
Age: 38
Posts: 8
New American Standard - which one?

I'm going to place an order for one of the 2008 American Standards in the next day or so. The place I'm going through has a Crimson Red Transparent w/ maple neck and a Blizzard Pearl w/ rosewood neck. Unfortunately, I'm not able to try them out in person. I love the look of the red (I think it's cool they're using a black pickguard on the ash models) but that one weighs 9 pounds, I don't have a lot of experience w/ a lot of different Tele's, from what I've read here, 9 lbs. is a little on the heavy side. The Blizzard Pearl weighs 8.2 pounds, it's also 100 bucks cheaper. I wish I could try 'em out but I won't be able to do that and I want this to be a keeper. I'm torn between the 2. Any feedback on which one I should get? Thanks.
maz12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 12th, 2008, 02:50 AM   #2 (permalink)
TDPRI Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Vienna
Posts: 25
Hi,

two weeks ago I went to the store to purchase one of the new American Standard Ash Teles. I tested 3 of them and compared them with a Baja (mexican made but great reviews everywhere in the net) and a 52 American Vintage Guitar.

Well, the Baja sound better than any of the 3 AS Ash Teles. I could not decide if the 52 sounded better than the Baja. Both guitar had their advantages soundwise. The 52 had a lighter body and the nitro-finish looks a bit better (but makes problems when swetting on stage), but it is 3 times the price of the Baja. So I took the Baja home.

I've just ordered a Bumblebee Tone-Cap, a treble-bleed-cap, copperfoil for shielding and a SKB Case for the new baby...

Cheers, Christian
__________________
~ God made me funky ~
Chris Twang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 12th, 2008, 04:13 AM   #3 (permalink)
Tele-Meister
 
marty h's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: gonzales,la
Age: 51
Posts: 179
i have the new olympic white with rosewood neck.comes with a good case.paid
980.00 for it.killer sound.
marty h is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 12th, 2008, 04:16 AM   #4 (permalink)
Tele-Meister
 
marty h's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: gonzales,la
Age: 51
Posts: 179
well he knocked a hundred bucks off it.i bought a few accessories with it also.
real nice and better made then past american std.i owned many before,you will
be happy with whatever color you like.
marty h is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 12th, 2008, 06:41 AM   #5 (permalink)
CIM
Tele-Meister
 
CIM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: U.K.
Posts: 227
Quote:
Originally Posted by marty h View Post
better made then past american std.i owned many before
Out of interest - better made than which era(s)? And where do the improvements show?
CIM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 12th, 2008, 06:50 AM   #6 (permalink)
Tele-Meister
 
incaowns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Hong kong.
Age: 17
Posts: 453
i ABSOLUTELY love the look of the blizzard pearl,
just cuz my inca silver looks similar
__________________
Sonic Blue Fender 69' Reissue Mustang.
Inca Silver Fender 98' American Standard Telecaster.
Faded Wine Mahogany Gibson 03' Les Paul Vintage Mahoany.
Lapis Blue Maple Quilt Top Ibanez 03' SZ520.
incaowns is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 12th, 2008, 07:46 AM   #7 (permalink)
Friend of Leo's
 
Jellecaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: New Hampshire, USA
Age: 39
Posts: 2,025
I love mine:

__________________
It was born at the junction of form and function...
Jellecaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 12th, 2008, 09:38 AM   #8 (permalink)
NEW MEMBER!
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Nebraska
Age: 38
Posts: 8
Thanks for the feedback. I do love the look of the Crimson Red but I think I'm leaning towards the Blizzard Pearl b/c it's lighter and 100 bucks cheaper. I also think I'd prefer the rosewood neck (but I'd be cool w/ maple). I'm also thinking if I were to ever get a 2nd one, I'd want a natural ash body w/ a humbucker in the neck position (I'm kind of a Keith Richards nut, though I don't dabble in open G). Then I'd have my bases covered, one in alder and one in ash. Getting a 2nd one would be a ways down the line, though. The red looks great but I also think the Blizzard Pearl looks pretty good, too. I still haven't decided but I'm thinking it'll be Blizzard Pearl. Whatever it is, I'm going to figure it out in the next few hours. Thanks again for the replies.

Also, I did have a chance to try one of these a few weeks ago side-by-side with a Baja and I thought the New American Standard was much better, though the Baja seemed like it'd received a lot of abuse on this particular showroom floor.
maz12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 12th, 2008, 11:37 AM   #9 (permalink)
Tele-Meister
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Paris; FRANCE
Age: 48
Posts: 129
The 5 screws attachment new bridge looks like the Squier ones; my first impression was that they are the same, with a logo added; in fact , that's not true. The screws holes are at different places...
teleyouk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 12th, 2008, 12:41 PM   #10 (permalink)
Poster Extraordinaire
 
boris bubbanov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: New Orleans, LA + in the past
Posts: 6,981
Quote:
Originally Posted by teleyouk View Post
The 5 screws attachment new bridge looks like the Squier ones; my first impression was that they are the same, with a logo added; in fact , that's not true. The screws holes are at different places...
Absolutely, otherwise folks would've been using Squier plates, paired with vintage "Strat" bent metal saddles to achieve this look for years. But Fender has been cagey about making just enough parts non-interchangeable between the Fenders and the pacific rim Squires (and CIK Fenders) to keep people from 'showing the way' as to what the design of Fender's guitars ought to be.

I am totally convinced, for instance, that the real reason the CIC (PRC) Squier Vintage Modified thinline is 24.75 scale not 25.5 is so that people would be stymied if they tried to upgrade the thing. Everyone in that board room knew the 24.75 would be inferior. I guess a few less PRC trade goods can't be bad.
__________________
Bubban0v
boris bubbanov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 12th, 2008, 01:34 PM   #11 (permalink)
NEW MEMBER!
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Nebraska
Age: 38
Posts: 8
For what it's worth, I decided to go w/ the Blizzard Pearl. The order is placed and I can't turn back. Now I wait. Here she is:
maz12 is offline   Reply With Quote

Forum Jump

Reply


Thread Tools



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Forums Directory

The words Fender®, Telecaster®, Stratocaster® and the associated headstock designs are registered trademarks of the Fender Musical Instruments Corporation.
The TDPRI is an independent,member supported forum and is not affiliated with Fender Musical Instruments Corporation.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
© TDPRI.COM 1999 - 2006 All rights reserved.