|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||
| Home | Forum | Resources | TeleShop | Gallery | Classifieds | Reviews | Register | FAQ | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Telecaster Discussion Forum The world's largest Fender Telecaster Discussion Forum. Please keep discussion limited to Telecaster topics here. |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
NEW MEMBER!
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Nebraska
Age: 38
Posts: 8
|
New American Standard - which one?
I'm going to place an order for one of the 2008 American Standards in the next day or so. The place I'm going through has a Crimson Red Transparent w/ maple neck and a Blizzard Pearl w/ rosewood neck. Unfortunately, I'm not able to try them out in person. I love the look of the red (I think it's cool they're using a black pickguard on the ash models) but that one weighs 9 pounds, I don't have a lot of experience w/ a lot of different Tele's, from what I've read here, 9 lbs. is a little on the heavy side. The Blizzard Pearl weighs 8.2 pounds, it's also 100 bucks cheaper. I wish I could try 'em out but I won't be able to do that and I want this to be a keeper. I'm torn between the 2. Any feedback on which one I should get? Thanks.
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
TDPRI Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Vienna
Posts: 33
|
Hi,
two weeks ago I went to the store to purchase one of the new American Standard Ash Teles. I tested 3 of them and compared them with a Baja (mexican made but great reviews everywhere in the net) and a 52 American Vintage Guitar. Well, the Baja sound better than any of the 3 AS Ash Teles. I could not decide if the 52 sounded better than the Baja. Both guitar had their advantages soundwise. The 52 had a lighter body and the nitro-finish looks a bit better (but makes problems when swetting on stage), but it is 3 times the price of the Baja. So I took the Baja home. I've just ordered a Bumblebee Tone-Cap, a treble-bleed-cap, copperfoil for shielding and a SKB Case for the new baby... Cheers, Christian
__________________
~ God made me funky ~ |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Meister
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: gonzales,la
Age: 52
Posts: 198
|
well he knocked a hundred bucks off it.i bought a few accessories with it also.
real nice and better made then past american std.i owned many before,you will be happy with whatever color you like. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Meister
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Hong kong.
Age: 17
Posts: 453
|
i ABSOLUTELY love the look of the blizzard pearl,
just cuz my inca silver looks similar
__________________
Sonic Blue Fender 69' Reissue Mustang. Inca Silver Fender 98' American Standard Telecaster. Faded Wine Mahogany Gibson 03' Les Paul Vintage Mahoany. Lapis Blue Maple Quilt Top Ibanez 03' SZ520. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
NEW MEMBER!
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Nebraska
Age: 38
Posts: 8
|
Thanks for the feedback. I do love the look of the Crimson Red but I think I'm leaning towards the Blizzard Pearl b/c it's lighter and 100 bucks cheaper. I also think I'd prefer the rosewood neck (but I'd be cool w/ maple). I'm also thinking if I were to ever get a 2nd one, I'd want a natural ash body w/ a humbucker in the neck position (I'm kind of a Keith Richards nut, though I don't dabble in open G). Then I'd have my bases covered, one in alder and one in ash. Getting a 2nd one would be a ways down the line, though. The red looks great but I also think the Blizzard Pearl looks pretty good, too. I still haven't decided but I'm thinking it'll be Blizzard Pearl. Whatever it is, I'm going to figure it out in the next few hours. Thanks again for the replies.
Also, I did have a chance to try one of these a few weeks ago side-by-side with a Baja and I thought the New American Standard was much better, though the Baja seemed like it'd received a lot of abuse on this particular showroom floor. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Meister
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Paris; FRANCE
Age: 49
Posts: 147
|
The 5 screws attachment new bridge looks like the Squier ones; my first impression was that they are the same, with a logo added; in fact , that's not true. The screws holes are at different places...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | |
|
Poster Extraordinaire
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: New Orleans, LA + in the past
Posts: 7,633
|
Quote:
I am totally convinced, for instance, that the real reason the CIC (PRC) Squier Vintage Modified thinline is 24.75 scale not 25.5 is so that people would be stymied if they tried to upgrade the thing. Everyone in that board room knew the 24.75 would be inferior. I guess a few less PRC trade goods can't be bad.
__________________
Bubban0v |
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
The words Fender®, Telecaster®, Stratocaster® and the associated headstock designs are registered trademarks of the Fender Musical Instruments Corporation.
The TDPRI is an independent,member supported forum and is not affiliated with Fender Musical Instruments Corporation.