Telecaster Guitar Forum
IMPORTANT: Treat everyone with respect, no matter how difficult that may be. No hate, politics, religion, sex or drug discussions.
No Commercial Posts: Do not use the TDPRI to buy or sell anything.
Telecaster Guitar Resources Guitar T-shirts
Guitar Tuner
6
E
5
A
4
D
3
G
2
B
1
E
Telecaster Music Shop

Telecaster Guitars at Ebay Musician's Friend Stupid Deal of the Day






Go Back   Telecaster Guitar Forum > Main Telecaster Forum > Telecaster Discussion Forum
Home Forum Resources Shop Gallery Classifieds Reviews Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Telecaster Discussion Forum The world's largest Fender Telecaster Discussion Forum. Please keep discussion limited to Telecaster topics here.

Forum Jump

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old February 8th, 2008, 04:00 AM   #1 (permalink)
Tele-Meister
 
porto leone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Greece
Age: 38
Posts: 106
MIM Nashville and MIM Classic '60s

has anybody compared these teles?
on the specs, the Nashville seems superior to me 'cause of the medium jumbo frets, the satin finished neck, the truss rod adjustment at the headstock and the middle pickup cavity. i wonder if the '60s has more mojo though.
i'm looking for some opinions for terms of quality and playability. i'm not interested so much for pickups and wiring, since i can change them easily.
one more thing that i'd like to know is if there are any differences in sound between the alder and the ash Nashville models.
porto leone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 8th, 2008, 07:41 AM   #2 (permalink)
Tele-Afflicted
 
holndav's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Tampa FL
Posts: 1,139
Other than the 3rd pup, I would decide based on whether you prefer bigger or smaller frets.

JMHO.

I love the reissues and the vintage frets but that's me.

David
__________________
"If we can't be free at least we can be cheap". FZ
holndav is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 8th, 2008, 07:59 AM   #3 (permalink)
Tele-Meister
 
garrett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Age: 29
Posts: 160
In my opinion, your conclusions are spot on and I chose the Nashville over a Classic for the same reasons. But it's a matter of preference of course. A lot of players still prefer the vintage specs of the Classic series.

Ash is generally a brighter sounding wood, and alder is more even-tempered. Either is a great sounding option.
__________________
--Garrett--
garrett is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 8th, 2008, 10:16 AM   #4 (permalink)
Tele-Afflicted
 
ajgus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: chicago
Posts: 1,593
I bought my Nashville for its reasonable price (under $600 new) & its swimming pool route. I've since sunk about $200 into it turning it into my ideal Tele for around the same price as the Classic. To me its a no-brainer.
__________________
"Is anyone here a Marine Biologist?!!!"
ajgus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 8th, 2008, 12:09 PM   #5 (permalink)
Poster Extraordinaire
 
boris bubbanov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: New Orleans, LA + in the past
Posts: 6,980
I've got 4 Deluxe Nashvilles in ash. I tried quite a number of all kinds, and just preferred the ash body and maple necked examples. YMMV.

I've a number of other Teles, and the Nashville is the least Tele-ish of all my single coil Teles, even with a three brass barrel plate and saddle mod. Some might say the Nashville is a quasi-strat hardtail. But with a change to a traditional 2 pickup setup, you can have a 'Classic 50's' type guitar with the bigger frets and flatter radius, and the thinner neck of the Classic 60's (and if found with a rosewood board, even the board).

I chose the Nashvilles over Classics because of plentiful supply, being able to choose from a large number of examples played in person, and a better price/value at that point in time. Had the Classics been blowing out at the time I was shopping, you best believe I'd have bought those, great guitars.
__________________
Bubban0v
boris bubbanov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 8th, 2008, 01:23 PM   #6 (permalink)
Tele-Afflicted
 
ajgus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: chicago
Posts: 1,593
Quote:
Originally Posted by boris bubbanov View Post
I' But with a change to a traditional 2 pickup setup, you can have a 'Classic 50's' type guitar with the bigger frets and flatter radius, and the thinner neck of the Classic 60's
That's what I did. Threw on some new pickups. My experience was that the switch to a vintage style bridge w/ brass saddles did, however, give me more of a "Tele" sound.
__________________
"Is anyone here a Marine Biologist?!!!"
ajgus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 9th, 2008, 12:51 PM   #7 (permalink)
PJ
Tele-Afflicted
 
PJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 1,772
I like my Nashville - especially after modding the pickups
to a set of Texas Special Strats & a Tele bridge. Nice guitar, nice frets, too. But, you're right, not a lot of vintage
mojo. Feels more modern than vintage.
__________________
PJ
"I don't know if it's art, but I like it."
PJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 9th, 2008, 01:05 PM   #8 (permalink)
Tele-Meister
 
sonicland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Pigs Holler, PA
Posts: 110
I know I'm probably in the minority but I really prefer the poly neck on the 62's. Not sure why and it's not a huge deal, I own both but if I could only have one I'd take the poly. Just thought I'd mention it so that it's known that not everyone likes the satin over the poly.
sonicland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 9th, 2008, 01:40 PM   #9 (permalink)
Tele-Afflicted
 
Axis29's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Virginia, USA
Age: 40
Posts: 1,045
Quote:
Originally Posted by sonicland View Post
I know I'm probably in the minority but I really prefer the poly neck on the 62's. Not sure why and it's not a huge deal, I own both but if I could only have one I'd take the poly. Just thought I'd mention it so that it's known that not everyone likes the satin over the poly.
By 'poly', do you mean a satin poly? Cause my Nasheville is covered in a shiny coating of poly....
__________________
John F.

TDPRI # 1764
Axis29 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 9th, 2008, 02:03 PM   #10 (permalink)
PJ
Tele-Afflicted
 
PJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 1,772
My Nashville had a satin finish on the neck, until I buffed it out. Now it's about the same as the Classic Series stuff.
Nice profile on the Nashville, though. Nice '70s C-profile.
__________________
PJ
"I don't know if it's art, but I like it."
PJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 9th, 2008, 02:15 PM   #11 (permalink)
Tele-Afflicted
 
beep.click's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: California
Age: 49
Posts: 1,553
I bought a Nashville because it was cheap ($330). I've never even SEEN a Classic 60s, to compare it to.

The Nashville doesn't seem very Tele to me -- neck is smaller than I prefer, but also very similar to the Strats I've played for years. The third pickup looks odd to me (but would disappear more into a different colored pickguard).

That being said, I've been playing the heck out of it since I got it, and recording with it. The recorded sound is PURE Tele.
__________________
"It looked like a giant green gum drop to me."
beep.click is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 9th, 2008, 03:06 PM   #12 (permalink)
Friend of Leo's
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Norway
Age: 61
Posts: 4,063
Quote:
Originally Posted by porto leone
on the specs, the Nashville seems superior to me 'cause of the medium jumbo frets, the satin finished neck, the truss rod adjustment at the headstock and the middle pickup cavity. i wonder if the '60s has more mojo though.
I find that the 60's Classics specs are superior, but that's merely a matter of personal taste. (When I started playing in the 60's all Telecasters had vintage specs ...)

Besides the obvious specs differences, there's not much difference in build quality. Both are great guitars, and playability is dependent on whether you like the vintage or modern specs. We probably disagree on that...

To me the biggest difference is the tone. I've gig'ed with a friend who plays the Nashville Tele, and while my '52RI and 60's Classic sounded typically vintage Tele (lots of twang), his Nashville sounded somewhat between a Tele and a Strat, or at least not the typical Tele sound that most of us connect with a Tele. It IS very versatile though, and on the bridge pickup you wouldn't mistake it for anything else than a Tele.
Telemarkman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 9th, 2008, 03:10 PM   #13 (permalink)
Friend of Leo's
 
BritishBluesBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Age: 40
Posts: 4,192
Get one of these... You know you want to...

__________________
BBB.
BritishBluesBoy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 9th, 2008, 04:30 PM   #14 (permalink)
PJ
Tele-Afflicted
 
PJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 1,772
Nashville with Texas Special Strat neck & middle, with custom guard from Terrapin Guitars.
IMGhttp://i215.photobucket.com/albums/cc200/pgazzara/HPIM1429.jpg[/IMG]
__________________
PJ
"I don't know if it's art, but I like it."
PJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 9th, 2008, 04:31 PM   #15 (permalink)
PJ
Tele-Afflicted
 
PJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 1,772
Nashville with Texas Special Strat neck & middle, with custom guard from Terrapin Guitars.
[IMG][/IMG]
__________________
PJ
"I don't know if it's art, but I like it."
PJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 10th, 2008, 12:23 AM   #16 (permalink)
Tele-Holic
 
sudancat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 700
The nashville does not sound like a strat.Its got all the twang and honk you could ask for. I got one, price was right and I was looking a honey blonde color. I eventually rewired it to a 3 way like a regular tele,changed pups to SD's, and changed the neck to a vinatge neck,narrower,installed a vintage bridge and 3 brass compensated saddles, and installed a push/pull pot to turn the middle strat pup on and off. I very seldom ever use it and when I do its just playin around. i will eventually discard the middle pup,change the pg to regular tele pg or find a honey blonde 2 pup tele and put a humbucker in the neck on the nashville.I paid around 4 and spent an extra $250. The changes were personal preference only.

I also have a 50s classic and a 52ri. The classics are great also. The only thing I changed on these were the saddles and pups, you know it, SD's. I paid around 5 for the classic and spent about $100 extra
sudancat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 10th, 2008, 03:21 AM   #17 (permalink)
Tele-Meister
 
porto leone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Greece
Age: 38
Posts: 106
in Europe the price range is different. it starts from 525 euros for the Classic '60s and from 585 euros for the Nashville. just for the record...
porto leone is offline   Reply With Quote

Forum Jump

Reply


Thread Tools



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Forums Directory

The words Fender®, Telecaster®, Stratocaster® and the associated headstock designs are registered trademarks of the Fender Musical Instruments Corporation.
The TDPRI is an independent,member supported forum and is not affiliated with Fender Musical Instruments Corporation.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:14 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
© TDPRI.COM 1999 - 2006 All rights reserved.