|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||
| Home | Forum | Resources | Shop | Gallery | Classifieds | Reviews | Register | FAQ | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Telecaster Discussion Forum The world's largest Fender Telecaster Discussion Forum. Please keep discussion limited to Telecaster topics here. |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Meister
|
MIM Nashville and MIM Classic '60s
has anybody compared these teles?
on the specs, the Nashville seems superior to me 'cause of the medium jumbo frets, the satin finished neck, the truss rod adjustment at the headstock and the middle pickup cavity. i wonder if the '60s has more mojo though. i'm looking for some opinions for terms of quality and playability. i'm not interested so much for pickups and wiring, since i can change them easily. one more thing that i'd like to know is if there are any differences in sound between the alder and the ash Nashville models. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Meister
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Age: 29
Posts: 160
|
In my opinion, your conclusions are spot on and I chose the Nashville over a Classic for the same reasons. But it's a matter of preference of course. A lot of players still prefer the vintage specs of the Classic series.
Ash is generally a brighter sounding wood, and alder is more even-tempered. Either is a great sounding option.
__________________
--Garrett-- |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Afflicted
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: chicago
Posts: 1,593
|
I bought my Nashville for its reasonable price (under $600 new) & its swimming pool route. I've since sunk about $200 into it turning it into my ideal Tele for around the same price as the Classic. To me its a no-brainer.
__________________
"Is anyone here a Marine Biologist?!!!" |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Poster Extraordinaire
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: New Orleans, LA + in the past
Posts: 6,980
|
I've got 4 Deluxe Nashvilles in ash. I tried quite a number of all kinds, and just preferred the ash body and maple necked examples. YMMV.
I've a number of other Teles, and the Nashville is the least Tele-ish of all my single coil Teles, even with a three brass barrel plate and saddle mod. Some might say the Nashville is a quasi-strat hardtail. But with a change to a traditional 2 pickup setup, you can have a 'Classic 50's' type guitar with the bigger frets and flatter radius, and the thinner neck of the Classic 60's (and if found with a rosewood board, even the board). I chose the Nashvilles over Classics because of plentiful supply, being able to choose from a large number of examples played in person, and a better price/value at that point in time. Had the Classics been blowing out at the time I was shopping, you best believe I'd have bought those, great guitars.
__________________
Bubban0v |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Afflicted
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: chicago
Posts: 1,593
|
That's what I did. Threw on some new pickups. My experience was that the switch to a vintage style bridge w/ brass saddles did, however, give me more of a "Tele" sound.
__________________
"Is anyone here a Marine Biologist?!!!" |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Afflicted
|
I like my Nashville - especially after modding the pickups
to a set of Texas Special Strats & a Tele bridge. Nice guitar, nice frets, too. But, you're right, not a lot of vintage mojo. Feels more modern than vintage.
__________________
PJ "I don't know if it's art, but I like it." |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Meister
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Pigs Holler, PA
Posts: 110
|
I know I'm probably in the minority but I really prefer the poly neck on the 62's. Not sure why and it's not a huge deal, I own both but if I could only have one I'd take the poly. Just thought I'd mention it so that it's known that not everyone likes the satin over the poly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
Tele-Afflicted
|
Quote:
__________________
John F. TDPRI # 1764 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Afflicted
|
My Nashville had a satin finish on the neck, until I buffed it out. Now it's about the same as the Classic Series stuff.
Nice profile on the Nashville, though. Nice '70s C-profile.
__________________
PJ "I don't know if it's art, but I like it." |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Afflicted
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: California
Age: 49
Posts: 1,553
|
I bought a Nashville because it was cheap ($330). I've never even SEEN a Classic 60s, to compare it to.
The Nashville doesn't seem very Tele to me -- neck is smaller than I prefer, but also very similar to the Strats I've played for years. The third pickup looks odd to me (but would disappear more into a different colored pickguard). That being said, I've been playing the heck out of it since I got it, and recording with it. The recorded sound is PURE Tele.
__________________
"It looked like a giant green gum drop to me." |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) | |
|
Friend of Leo's
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Norway
Age: 61
Posts: 4,063
|
Quote:
Besides the obvious specs differences, there's not much difference in build quality. Both are great guitars, and playability is dependent on whether you like the vintage or modern specs. We probably disagree on that... To me the biggest difference is the tone. I've gig'ed with a friend who plays the Nashville Tele, and while my '52RI and 60's Classic sounded typically vintage Tele (lots of twang), his Nashville sounded somewhat between a Tele and a Strat, or at least not the typical Tele sound that most of us connect with a Tele. It IS very versatile though, and on the bridge pickup you wouldn't mistake it for anything else than a Tele. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Holic
|
The nashville does not sound like a strat.Its got all the twang and honk you could ask for. I got one, price was right and I was looking a honey blonde color. I eventually rewired it to a 3 way like a regular tele,changed pups to SD's, and changed the neck to a vinatge neck,narrower,installed a vintage bridge and 3 brass compensated saddles, and installed a push/pull pot to turn the middle strat pup on and off. I very seldom ever use it and when I do its just playin around. i will eventually discard the middle pup,change the pg to regular tele pg or find a honey blonde 2 pup tele and put a humbucker in the neck on the nashville.I paid around 4 and spent an extra $250. The changes were personal preference only.
I also have a 50s classic and a 52ri. The classics are great also. The only thing I changed on these were the saddles and pups, you know it, SD's. I paid around 5 for the classic and spent about $100 extra |
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
The words Fender®, Telecaster®, Stratocaster® and the associated headstock designs are registered trademarks of the Fender Musical Instruments Corporation.
The TDPRI is an independent,member supported forum and is not affiliated with Fender Musical Instruments Corporation.