|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||
| Home | Forum | Resources | Shop | Gallery | Classifieds | Reviews | Register | FAQ | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Telecaster Discussion Forum The world's largest Fender Telecaster Discussion Forum. Please keep discussion limited to Telecaster topics here. |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Meister
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: san francisco
Posts: 128
|
Feather-caster
It's Friday night and I should be either practicing or at the honky tonk but instead I sit wondering about the relative weights of Tele components. Yeah.
Anyways, maybe someone could edujumacate me on the rough average weights of the following: 1. Standard Tele body 2. Thinline or chamber body 3. Neck I know there is prolly a huge range in body weights but curious about the middle of the bell curve. I'm guessing necks, like hardware, are pretty narrow in their range. This goes to my desire to assemble a lightweight practice Tele. Not really worried about crazy sustain or a 3D sound so much as I am something that won't require a shoulder massage at the end of the day. That said I don't want something so dead and thin that I end up reaching for my twangdiddley 7.5 pound Baja + asprin. So looking to strike a balance in there somewhere. What are the lightest weight body woods? I know basswood is relatively light, how does it compare to swamp ash? Any suggestions for putting together a Feather-caster? Thanks in advance, Hugh |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Friend of Leo's
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Seattle
Posts: 3,413
|
I don't know how they meter on on the scale, but my stock '69 RI Thinline never causes shoulder/back fatigue. It's like, Parker Fly light.
__________________
It takes two people to paint a perfect painting: one to paint it, and the other to shoot him when it's done. http://www.myspace.com/travishartnett http://www.myspace.com/sugarcanemutiny http://www.myspace.com/davidbavas |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |
|
Tele-Afflicted
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: California
Age: 49
Posts: 1,579
|
Quote:
Seriously, I much prefer playing seated. The bonus is, unlike my shoulder -- my leg can't tell how much the guitar weighs. As for Tele body weights, I've never seen a HEAVY Thinline...
__________________
"It looked like a giant green gum drop to me." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Friend of Leo's
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 4,403
|
If you want to experience what a really light Tele feels like, go out and play a Gibson SG. Stand up and put a strap on it. The neck dives right for the floor because the body on an SG is so light. Same goes for a Tele.
Personally, I find a body weight of 4 to 4 1/2 lbs to the best for balance and a pretty safe bet for sound. Anyway, here's the "original" Feather-Caster! Feather is my last name so I had a decal made up to look a little Fender-like, but bearing my name. I made the neck in 1982. It's my first handmade neck and I still play it. The body is Warmoth, very light, and the pickup is a Kinman. It's sort of an adult sized Musicmaster. The scale length is a custom 25 3/4" ![]() ![]()
__________________
Dogs have the right idea! |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Friend of Leo's
|
I find that a low/medium weight but well balanced guitar is easier on the back than a very light guitar that's neck heavy. Even a slight forward pull of the strap gets to me after a while...more so than a bit more weight hanging straight down on both strap ends.
And as I very much prefer a solid chunky neck to a modern slim one any very low weight body will result in a neck-heavy guitar. From what I can tell a 4.5 to 5 pound body is usually about right. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
Friend of Leo's
|
Quote:
You could skip the tone, switch, and volume controls and go straight to the output jack. Save you some more weight. Lots of little tricks if you want to cut the weight down. Such as cut down the bridge plate, use a mahogany neck which is lighter than maple and will help with the neck dive problem. Use a graphite non-adjustable truss rod. (Works with steel string acoustic guitar necks, ought to work with lighter tension electric guitar necks.) You get the idea. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Meister
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: san francisco
Posts: 128
|
4.5 pound body + standard neck/hardware = balanced?
Good suggestions all. I think my strategy is to buy/build a Tele that is balanced (CG at 21st fret). From your suggestions it would seem that using a standard maple neck and standard hardware I should be looking for a body that's ~4.5 pounds. Does this sound about right?
I played a couple MIM thinlines recently and they were both a tad tail heavy. There is also another practical concern when it comes to weight: I sit at the computer a lot and practice so I'm taking both hands off the guitar (like right now) to type or set up a song and I don't want to worry about the neck going for the sky and the subsequent rescue which happens frequently. Hugh |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Holic
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: chicago
Posts: 683
|
I've got a swamp ash body that weighs in under 4.0 lbs and it's unbelievably light... it feels like a toy, once I got past the initial shock of how light it was it's turning into my favorite standing and playing guitar.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Meister
|
Dean was/is makin those dirt cheap vendetta's out of Paulownia. Super-light and very toneful.
__________________
"We been outta work so long...we had to put together some kinda act just to show the promoters what kinda work we're out of." (Johnny Cash 1958 Hadley's Town Hall Party) |
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
The words Fender®, Telecaster®, Stratocaster® and the associated headstock designs are registered trademarks of the Fender Musical Instruments Corporation.
The TDPRI is an independent,member supported forum and is not affiliated with Fender Musical Instruments Corporation.