|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||
| Home | Forum | Resources | T-Shirts & Etc | Music | Photos | Classifieds | Register | FAQ | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Notices |
| Telecaster Discussion Forum The world's largest Fender Telecaster Discussion Forum. Please keep discussion limited to Telecaster topics here. |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Friend of Leo's
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: South of Heaven
Posts: 3,098
|
Do the pros Fret Out???
Or do they have a way to prevent it?
Do they just deal with it? Do they avoid 7.25 radius necks? What's their solution/remedy/coping mechanism? Last edited by furrfurrfurr; April 26th, 2007 at 04:49 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Holic
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Arkansas(Razorbacks)
Age: 47
Posts: 556
|
Brad Paisley's main old 69 Paisley has a 7.5 radius. However, I don't see him do extreme bends very often, usually only a whole step and not usually above the 15th fret.
__________________
...it's not the load that breaks you down it's the way in which you carry it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Holic
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 904
|
You can't defy the laws of physics.
A pro setup, with frets levelled and crowned, correct relief set goes a long way. Most pros who use curved boards also set the high E, and to a lesser extent the B to a flatter radius (higher).
You really can't get much below 1/16" at the 12th fret. P.
__________________
Listen to your mother |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Afflicted
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Long Island, New York
Age: 55
Posts: 1,213
|
They fret out but do not "fret" about it.
__________________
"I feel that it is healthier to look out at the world through a window than through a mirror. Otherwise, all you see is yourself and whatever is behind you." - Bill Withers |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
Tele-Afflicted
|
Quote:
__________________
*{disclaimer} It's like EVERYTHING else on this entire forum, it boils down to what YOU choose, to suit you. If the human mind was a simple thing to understand, we would be too simple to understand it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Afflicted
|
If your frets were tall to start with and you have a fret level or two done you can end up with a radius that's flatter than 7.5 anyway...especially on the higher frets where the flatter radius makes more of a difference and where they wear slower (assuming you're not Yngwie). It all depends on the Tech that did the leveling and setup.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Afflicted
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Chicagoland
Age: 28
Posts: 1,129
|
Most professionals have balls and usually have their action set fairly high. I find when I lay off from playing with my band and do a lot of playing on my own I'm constantly lowering my action and making my guitar more playable. This sounds fine in my basement, but when I get to a live situation my guitar frets out and sounds like crap. I think of someone like Mike Bloomfield who was playing a lot in the 60s touring, etc, probably kept his guitar in unhealthy weather situations and I'm willing to be the action on his telecaster was not tended to very often.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Poster Extraordinaire
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Norway
Age: 62
Posts: 6,201
|
One of the really "Big Benders" of all time, Roy Buchanan, played a 7.25" radius board at least throughout the 70s, and I,ve never heard him fret out. But then he preferred a rather high action.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
Tele-Afflicted
|
Quote:
Being used to vintage shaped necks I can only feel that were I to get exactly the neck I wanted compound radius would have to be the way to go. I'm sure the pros fret out sometimes, they just let that take go on the record. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Afflicted
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: austin, tx
Posts: 1,623
|
well...
i can only speak for mysedlf and i do make my living playing guitar so i'll weigh in... i always play 7.25 radius with very high action... i never fret out... when it's time to replace frets i use a size slightly bigger than standard vintage... not because i don't like vintage size, with my action there's really no difference but because they last a bit longer... i pretty much play the same guitar at every occasion so it get's a lot of wear time... tj
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) | |
|
Poster Extraordinaire
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Lubbock, TX
Posts: 6,010
|
Quote:
Note that fret out can occur when not bending, too. This results from high/low fret situations and bad line of neck problems. olewichita is getting old....hence the monniker... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Holic
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: NY
Posts: 822
|
I have that book also, Dan Erlewine measures and analyzes a lot of pro's guitars. Almost all of them have a flatter radius than 7 1/4". The conclusion I drew from the book was if the guitar is old its been refretted so many times the radius near the bridge end winds up being 10" to 12". So to answer the original question it would seem the pros avoid 7 1/4" radius necks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Afflicted
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: austin, tx
Posts: 1,623
|
sean...
ah, at last the truth shall be revealed... i was nicknamed wichita by austin drummer lisa pankratz when we both toured with rock and roll legend ronnie dawson... wichita is the shy and outta tune guitar player on the lester roadhog moran and his caddilac cowboys albums... they were the "hillbilly comedy" alter ego of the statler bros. and probably the greatest thing the statlers ever did... it's really very, very funny... i guess i was either shy or outta tune;) in those days i could go on for days without speaking and all wichita ever said was; yup... lester would always introduce him as ole wichita... tj
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 (permalink) |
|
Poster Extraordinaire
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Lubbock, TX
Posts: 6,010
|
So, wichita, your tag is not descriptive.
Regarding radiusing frets vs. fretboards, one thing to keep in mind that if one radiuses the frets, the middle of the fret will be closer to the board than the outside. some players might find this disconcerting...sensitive types, you know. I consider defretting, re-radiusing the board and refertting to be the better option. I also have seen vintage Fenders with no dots left due to this practice. work on enough of them and you will see it all. I have seen Fender necks that had line-of-neck problems with the board worked to near nothing in areas...low fret and/or high fret areas. 'Kick up' necks often have no board in the tongue area if they have ever been worked for the problem. When the fret tangs are into the maple, it was past time for a new board when the last person worked refretted. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Meister
|
One mans gold is another mans poison -
You can pretty much correct fret-out to be compatable with your playing style by raising or lowering the saddles, adjusting the neck relief, leveling frets, installing taller frets, using a shim under the neck, or any combination of the above.
__________________
http://steve-steveszone.blogspot.com/ Time you enjoy wasting is not wasted. John Lennon |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 (permalink) |
|
Friend of Leo's
|
Pros that use vintage radius don't fret out.
Doubt string action or string height is really a factor. Might be but might not be. They just know how to do it second nature because they never considered it an ISSUE. You learn or teach yourself how to make it work and often second nature. They don't ponder over it. They just do it and whatever technique is necessary be it additional string pressure or changing hand/fingers/ arm positioning or whatever....They just do it and adapt. Often it is done without or Second Nature. I never even considered it at all and granted I am not what I consider a pro but prior to websites like this never was a factor or a problem. One should not ever get caught up in MIND SETS in the music business.
__________________
"Somewhere between culture and agriculture" |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 (permalink) | |
|
Poster Extraordinaire
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Lubbock, TX
Posts: 6,010
|
Quote:
Geo wrote: "Pros that use vintage radius don't fret out. Doubt string action or string height is really a factor. Might be but might not be. They just know how to do it second nature because they never considered it an ISSUE. You learn or teach yourself how to make it work and often second nature. They don't ponder over it. They just do it and whatever technique is necessary be it additional string pressure or changing hand/fingers/ arm positioning or whatever....They just do it and adapt. Often it is done without or Second Nature" There is nothing in a player's technique that will correct neck problems and/or a bad set-up. Pros con't fret out simply because the action is properly set for that neck and that player's style. Ex: Most players are satisfied with the ability to bend the hgh E one step...2 frets. Someone like Buddy Guy will want a set-up that allows him to take that high E almost to the other side of the neck without fretting out....2 1/2"-3 steps. This demand would require a much higher action...given the same radius...whatever that radius might be. |
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
|
|
IMPORTANT:Treat everyone here with respect, no matter how difficult! No sex, drug, political, religion or hate discussion permitted here.