|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||
| Home | Forum | Resources | TeleShop | Gallery | Classifieds | Reviews | Register | FAQ | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Telecaster Discussion Forum The world's largest Fender Telecaster Discussion Forum. Please keep discussion limited to Telecaster topics here. |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
TDPRI Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: San Diego
Posts: 28
|
Antiquities vs. Broadcaster
I've been playing a G&L ASAT Classic with a Seymour Duncan Broadcaster in the bridge for the last 10 years or so. I played some Fender Custom Shop guitars that sounded real good and understand that they were using Antiquities. Are these different than the standard Broadcaster?
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Afflicted
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,739
|
I agree, the Broadcaster - for me - is a bit more versatile and able to get pretty rockin'. A lot more mids - which I prefer.
__________________
www.krisgeren.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Doctor of Teleocity
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Bakersfield Ca.
Age: 58
Posts: 12,745
|
I tried both these in the same guitar I found the differences to be very slight.
The Antiquity did sound better but it cost $60 used where as I got the Broadcaster for $35 used. The Antiquity broke up a tad more. They were both great you cant go wrong both a good choice and they get the Bakersfield thumbs up.
__________________
I'm so blind my seeing eye dog needs glasses. |
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|

The words Fender®, Telecaster®, Stratocaster® and the associated headstock designs are registered trademarks of the Fender Musical Instruments Corporation.
The TDPRI is an independent,member supported forum and is not affiliated with Fender Musical Instruments Corporation.