|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||
| Home | Forum | Resources | TeleShop | Gallery | Classifieds | Reviews | Register | FAQ | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Telecaster Discussion Forum The world's largest Fender Telecaster Discussion Forum. Please keep discussion limited to Telecaster topics here. |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Holic
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Virginia
Posts: 673
|
Alder or Swamp Ash?
As I prepare to build my next parts-caster, I find myself trying to decide between alder and swamp ash. I currently have one of each and like them both, but it's difficult to compare accurately because they have different pickups. I hate grain-filling, which is a point in favor of alder. Then again, I like the feel of a nice light swamp ash body. Cosmetics are not an issue, since I love the swamp ash grain patterns but would also like to do one with a bird's eye maple lam top.
So I'm soliciting votes and opinions: alder or swamp ash?
__________________
There is more stupidity than hydrogen in the universe, and it has a longer shelf life. -Frank Zappa |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Afflicted
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 1,222
|
I built a Tele with a swamp ash body without filling the grain.
I used Minwax Wipe-on Poly. It came out great but isn't a conventional electric guitar finish. The grain can be felt through the finish. It looks like furniture. I highly recommend it.
__________________
Don |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Meister
|
(everything I say here I've read on sites like the Guitar ReRanch - I've simply confirmed the wisdom of others through my own trial and errors)
I like swamp ash, but to my taste it needs careful application of grain filler (I want to see the grain through a glass smooth finish. Some woods don't need filler (which is why they are more popular in mass production ,one less step - but if you don't fill the grain on ash, you'll wind up with an uneven surface with valleys that follow the grain, looks very amateurish (in my opinion)
__________________
http://steve-steveszone.blogspot.com/ Time you enjoy wasting is not wasted. John Lennon |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Holic
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: San Jose
Age: 58
Posts: 787
|
Depends on what color
If I wanted anything other than a solid color, I'd go to the extra trouble of grain filling ash. I wouldn't do it for a solid color. I'm doing a Mary Kay strat for a friend right now, and it is a pain to grain fill. You have to like to sand. I'm being extra anal on this one and after two grain fill applications, I just went out in the full sun and spot filled some more. It is well worth it for any semi or fully transparent surface.
I'm jonesing for a shell pink 60s style tele and it won't be an ash body for sure. I'll have Tommy at USACG send me a light two or three piece alder body with a few ugly blems. I too could not tell you with a straight face I could tell the difference in a blind test. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Meister
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: NW Atlanta
Posts: 387
|
It ain't THAT bad !!!
I guess I'm one of the few that doesn't think that grain filling swamp ash was as PAINFUL as others do
Now I'm not gonna say it was a pile of laughs, but it wasn't a nightmare either. Its an acquired skill - (like drinking scotch.), but I picked it up very quickly. If you're in a hurry to do a quick project, its easier to use alder. But if you can enjoy patiently working on a project and don't mind taking the extra steps, then swamp ash isn't that bad -and this was my first nitro project. Just follow Reranch 101 and ask questions on their discussion board...lots of friendly folks will help if you ask humbly - and share pictures when you're done. I guess I really enjoyed the effort of finishing my own guitar - a labor of love -more than paying someone else to do it. Everytime I look at it, I can take pride that "I did it myself". (Somehow that takes some of the sting out of my mediocre playing abilities.) Historically, I believe most solid color Teles were alder, cause Leo wasn't one to spend any more scheckels than he had to. But I chose a medium lightweight USACG swamp ash body ...just because that's what I wanted - history be damned. And how many southpaw Surf Green swamp ash Teles w/maple on maple neck do you see out there, anyway?? (Now I wanna do more !!! Maybe I'l try alder next time.) Edited to add: Sorry Doc - just discovered that you're an experienced finisher - and here I am trying to give YOU advice. Sounds to me that you prefer the lighter weight of a nice piece of swamp ash, so I vote for that. Ignore everything else I said - unless you're a newbee sitting on the fence about finishing your own swamp ash.
__________________
the Grand High Exalted Mystic Poobah of the Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy I spent most of my money on women and beer...the rest I just wasted. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Holic
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Virginia
Posts: 673
|
Not at all - I appreciate all of the input. I'm definitely getting better at filling. Bill at Reranch told me to wipe the excess off with a naphtha-soaked rag about 10 minutes after applying, and that bit of advice is about the only info that wasn't in Reranch 101. I'll probably bite the bullet - found a nice 3-lb body with pretty nice grain - not quite as awe-inspiring as the one I just finished, but pretty nice, and a single piece, so I guess I'll go for it.
Thanks to all - nothing like a unanimous vote to tip the scales! 8)
__________________
There is more stupidity than hydrogen in the universe, and it has a longer shelf life. -Frank Zappa |
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|

The words Fender®, Telecaster®, Stratocaster® and the associated headstock designs are registered trademarks of the Fender Musical Instruments Corporation.
The TDPRI is an independent,member supported forum and is not affiliated with Fender Musical Instruments Corporation.