The Number 1 Fender Telecaster Guitar authority in the world.
fender telecaster electric guitar discussion forum
Make a donation with PayPal Telecaster Guitars at Ebay

Supporting Vendors
Wilde Pickups by Bill & Becky Lawrence WD Music Products Amplified Parts Mod Kits DIY Amps, Mods, Pedals dallenpickups.com Tommy Guitars Warmoth.com
advertise on the tdpri 


   

Go Back   Telecaster Guitar Forum > Main Telecaster Forum > Telecaster Discussion Forum
Forgot Username/Password? Join Us!

Notices

Telecaster Discussion Forum The world's largest Fender Telecaster Discussion Forum. Please keep discussion limited to Telecaster topics here.

Forum Jump


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old May 23rd, 2012, 09:52 PM   #1 (permalink)
TDPRI Member
 
wyclif's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Delaware, USA
Posts: 73
'51 Nocaster NOS vs. Nocaster Relic

A fellow Fender fan and player was over at my place last weekend and admired my '51 Nocaster NOS so much that he's contemplating getting one of the new ones from the CS.

He asked me whether he should look at the Relic version. Now, usually I take a dim view of the whole "relic" trend and I know many of you do as well.

I told him that a year ago I had seen a Relic version and I wasn't impressed. The body of the guitar was actually very well done but when I looked at the fretboard the "wear" didn't look like a convincing imitation of normal play wear at all. For one thing, they did the fretboard relic all up and down the fretboard. Now, if you've seen a really old Tele that's just not how they look. The wear is almost always greater on the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd fret positions low on the neck (near the headstock) because that's where most guitarists play on the neck the most.

So, instead of trying to steer my friend away from the Relic and toward the NOS, and at the risk of splitting hairs, I thought I'd open it up and ask what the mind of TDPRI is on this subject for those who own, play, or have seen these Nocasters.

__________________
"I wasn't kissing her, I was whispering in her mouth." ~ Chico Marx
wyclif is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Ads   #
Sponsored posting
 
 
Join Date: March, 2003
Location: Forum HQ
Posts: N/A
Sponsored by...

Google is online  
Old May 23rd, 2012, 10:06 PM   #2 (permalink)
Tele-Meister
 
NickDanger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 280
I have one of each. They both sound fantastic. The NOS feels like a new guitar, the relic feels like an old one.
NickDanger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 23rd, 2012, 10:07 PM   #3 (permalink)
Friend of Leo's
 
vanguard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Athens, GA
Posts: 2,204
i own one of each. i like the feel of the back of the neck better on the relic, i like the overall sound better of the NOS.
__________________
My band: The Pointed Firs
vanguard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 23rd, 2012, 10:10 PM   #4 (permalink)
Tele-Meister
 
akukulich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Middletown, DE USA
Age: 49
Posts: 221
I've got a '51 Nocaster Relic, but that wasn't necessarily by design. I got it because I liked it, not because it was or wasn't a relic. Given a choice, not sure what way I'd go.
akukulich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 23rd, 2012, 10:43 PM   #5 (permalink)
Tele-Meister
 
Encinitastubes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Encinitas, California
Age: 46
Posts: 375
I have an NOS, a closet classic, and a heavy relic. The biggest difference is that the heavy relic feels like it has a shaved neck and has fat frets. Other than that, I wouldn't say that any difference has anything to do with the relicing. All three sound slightly different, weigh slightly differently, and have slightly different neck shapes. They are each excellent. I, too, was not a big fan of relicing, but really prefer the feel of the shaved neck. Also, with the closet classic and NOS, I find myself wondering when the first nick is going to occur. With the the heavy relic, I can use it has a foot stool, baseball bat, or sledge hammer and I don't worry too much about it. I say find a used one that you like and go with it.
Encinitastubes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 23rd, 2012, 11:02 PM   #6 (permalink)
TDPRI Member
 
wyclif's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Delaware, USA
Posts: 73
What exactly is the difference between an NOS and a closet classic in terms of features?
__________________
"I wasn't kissing her, I was whispering in her mouth." ~ Chico Marx
wyclif is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 23rd, 2012, 11:14 PM   #7 (permalink)
Tele-Meister
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: naperville, il
Posts: 264
I have a NOS Nocaster but have already begun to relic it on my own. I hope with some more paint chips and dings, I will increase the resale value to that of a Nocaster relic model.
stephenyi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 23rd, 2012, 11:27 PM   #8 (permalink)
Friend of Leo's
 
Alex W's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: In my tube amp coccoon.
Age: 45
Posts: 2,223
I have a NOS Nocaster and I prefer that to a relic. That said, every relic Nocaster I've ever played was really nice.
Alex W is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 24th, 2012, 12:21 AM   #9 (permalink)
Friend of Leo's
 
Rolling Estonian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Bethesda, MD.
Age: 44
Posts: 3,666
I have not played a nocaster that I didn't love, NOS or relic. Not a relic fan but they're really, really nice. Maybe one day but I got a Taylor to get first.

M
__________________
"This here's a joy ride so I say en-joy!" Dana Carvey as H. Ross Perot
Rolling Estonian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 24th, 2012, 01:44 AM   #10 (permalink)
Friend of Leo's
 
soulman969's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Englewood, CO
Posts: 3,351
Quote:
Originally Posted by wyclif View Post
What exactly is the difference between an NOS and a closet classic in terms of features?
None. The Closet Classic (like mine) is just and gently aged version of your NOS. It's intended to look the way a 51 Nocaster would look if was played little and stored in the closet in it's case most of it's life. Hence the name.
__________________
CS 51 Nocaster, "Nashcaster"/Nashville>Nocaster conv., MIM>Nashville conv./Onamac Tall Blues pups, Squier CVC/Keystones pups, CV 60's Jazz Bass, Matt Freeman PBass/Wilde P46 pup, Taylor 414CE. Roland Cube 40xl, Bugera v5, Roland BC 60, tc BG250, GK MB112.
soulman969 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 24th, 2012, 02:12 AM   #11 (permalink)
Tele-Afflicted
 
EsquireOK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 1,118
I guess it depends on him. I would go for the NOS over the Relic every single time, if there was a choice. When it comes to reissues, I want to receive the guitar as if it was new back the '50's or '60's, and have it break in over time from my own playing wear. Even if I wanted a Relic, I would get the NOS, and have someone like Mark Jenny do the relic work, after having played it for a few years. That way he could see where and how my natural wear was occurring before he took the bike chain to it. His relic work looks 100X better than Fender's in my opinion. A lot of the Relics Fender is making look really bad to my eyes. Not only that, but they can be remarkably similar guitar to guitar. I saw three Relic Teles, same exact model, same exact paint job, in a local shop one time, and the wear on all three of them looked near identical (and none of it all that realistic).
EsquireOK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 24th, 2012, 02:51 AM   #12 (permalink)
TDPRI Member
 
blackkeys's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 52
I own a 2000 Nocaster Relic. One of the best Nocasters I had - and I had 4 included a Master Built but this one stays.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	P1070083.jpg
Views:	93
Size:	62.0 KB
ID:	128536   Click image for larger version

Name:	gFoto.jpg
Views:	83
Size:	43.3 KB
ID:	128537   Click image for larger version

Name:	P1070086.jpg
Views:	73
Size:	50.9 KB
ID:	128538  

blackkeys is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 24th, 2012, 06:57 AM   #13 (permalink)
Friend of Leo's
 
Twang Tone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: UK
Age: 40
Posts: 2,268
The Relic will feel better for sure, but really, it's down to him.

My Nocaster is a 2006 Closet Classic and for me, it's Perfection. Why? Because I was never that keen on Heavy Relics and the NOS looks too new. So the CC is the bowl of Porridge that is Just Right!

Thanks,
__________________
TT
Twang Tone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 24th, 2012, 11:51 AM   #14 (permalink)
Tele-Meister
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: san francisco,ca
Posts: 373
Quote:
Originally Posted by NickDanger View Post
I have one of each. They both sound fantastic. The NOS feels like a new guitar, the relic feels like an old one.

^^^^^^
johnthatcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 24th, 2012, 01:15 PM   #15 (permalink)
Mur
Tele-Afflicted
 
Mur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 1,380
I relic'd a Closet Classic and it looks and feels old.
.
Mur is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 24th, 2012, 08:37 PM   #16 (permalink)
TDPRI Member
 
wyclif's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Delaware, USA
Posts: 73
Quote:
Originally Posted by EsquireOK View Post
A lot of the Relics Fender is making look really bad to my eyes. Not only that, but they can be remarkably similar guitar to guitar. I saw three Relic Teles, same exact model, same exact paint job, in a local shop one time, and the wear on all three of them looked near identical (and none of it all that realistic).
For me it's specifically the fretboard jobs that are the issue. Fender CS relics them as if the owner played equally all up and down the neck, but almost nobody plays like that, not even jazz guitarists. To look realistic, most of the wear should be within the 1st or 2nd chord positions, i.e. the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th frets. It should look like the natural oils and salts from the player's left hand discoloured the fretboard finish. It shouldn't look like somebody bike chained or chipped the finish off the fretboard. The relicing they do on the body and the back of the neck looks OK to me, but the fretboard work doesn't look right at all.
__________________
"I wasn't kissing her, I was whispering in her mouth." ~ Chico Marx
wyclif is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 24th, 2012, 09:08 PM   #17 (permalink)
Friend of Leo's
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: UK
Age: 33
Posts: 3,724
If you are buying a guitar based on the position of the neck wear you are doing it wrong.

Relic or not isn't an issue, just buy the best feeling and sounding guitar you can no matter the label.
imsilly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 24th, 2012, 09:20 PM   #18 (permalink)
Tele-Holic
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Twangers Medows USA
Posts: 957
I own both! Relic first NOS #2. I go for feel & tone.
TeleTown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 24th, 2012, 09:33 PM   #19 (permalink)
Friend of Leo's
 
xtrajerry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: New York
Age: 52
Posts: 3,511
Always liked the Closet Classics but I was sort of anti heavy relic until I saw my crimson double bound.. It's a limited run, was told it was one of 5.. Not sure if I believe that but it looks like real wear and called out to me.
xtrajerry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 24th, 2012, 09:34 PM   #20 (permalink)
Poster Extraordinaire
 
telex76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Fort Worth,Tx.
Age: 62
Posts: 8,812
I've got an NOS Nocaster, only because I got a deal I couldn't pass up.
I much prefer the Relic just because of the way it feels.
telex76 is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump




IMPORTANT:Treat everyone here with respect, no matter how difficult! No sex, drug, political, religion or hate discussion permitted here.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 RC 2
© TDPRI.COM 1999 - 2012 All rights reserved.