|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||
| Home | Forum | Resources | TeleShop | Gallery | Classifieds | Reviews | Register | FAQ | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Telecaster Discussion Forum The world's largest Fender Telecaster Discussion Forum. Please keep discussion limited to Telecaster topics here. |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Meister
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Lethbridge, AB, Canada
Posts: 182
|
Wireless Anyone?
The acoustic guitarist in my band is thinkin' about going wireless. I see that Michael Murphy, Fuzzy and a few others are using wireless guitar systems. What are the good ones & some pro's/con's
__________________
The smoker you drink the player you get~Joe Walsh |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Friend of Leo's
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Cleveland,OH But my heart's still in TE
Posts: 3,077
|
I would do just about anything to be able to run wireless. Unfortunately, I can't locate ONE system that I could possibly afford that doesn't ruin any hint of tone. (just my opinion, but to me there is a very noticeable diffrence.) Acoustic on the other hand, might be a diffrent story. Depending on the electronics, (for simplicity's sake I'll assume it's just a pre-amped piezo) you only get the sound that the crystal manufactures, and not the actual sound of the guitar anyway. So with a full band mix, a little sterile digitalization might not be bad, it may even help it cut through a little better. All of this is just spur of the moment theorization, but that being said, I know alot of guys that are using the "shure" systems. I'm not sure of the model, but I think they are around 200-300 bucks at your local big-box wal-mart style music retailer. And just so I don't get totally flamed, I'll include that I do around a dozen acoustic gigs a month, all with "just a pre-amped piezo" and I wasn't rippin' on 'em at all, just stating facts :) .
Jake
__________________
"On a scale of dead to pretty good, it might have been the perfect day..." |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Holic
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Philly Pa
Posts: 763
|
love wireless...
I have a Samson Airlite that is great..as long as ya ain't playin a Tele...won't work in a Tele...so the Shure works in there... but I love the freedom of a wireless....just takes alittle time to get the right tone...but it's really easy to compensate ....The Airlite is the most transparent of all of them out there....it's a shame that ya can't use it with a Tele tho........don
__________________
it ain't nuttin but the bluez.... |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
TDPRI Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 30
|
Wireless?
I play in a lot of old, usually poorly wired bars, and the wireless eliminates the shock problem. I bought a Carvin that was being discontinued, and so was $125.00 new. Sounds fine, after working with it a bit to balance volume and tone, and as I mentioned, saves me the worry about whether the building is properly grounded, as well as reducing the clutter of wires...YMMV.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
TDPRI Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 24
|
Gots me a Sienhiesser....
Works well with all my guits including acoustic. Four channels, no waiting. Good tone signal playing live but I wouldn't use it for recording. Lots of bells and whistles for adjustments.
Pretty pricey, but you get what you pay for... Bob |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Meister
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Lethbridge, AB, Canada
Posts: 182
|
Thanks All...
Thanks for all the replies. I was in Calgary today and looked at a few. I just might get one for myself (I can't let the other guitar player run aound and have all the fun!!!).
__________________
The smoker you drink the player you get~Joe Walsh |
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|

The words Fender®, Telecaster®, Stratocaster® and the associated headstock designs are registered trademarks of the Fender Musical Instruments Corporation.
The TDPRI is an independent,member supported forum and is not affiliated with Fender Musical Instruments Corporation.