|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||
| Home | Forum | Resources | TeleShop | Gallery | Classifieds | Reviews | Register | FAQ | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Telecaster Discussion Forum The world's largest Fender Telecaster Discussion Forum. Please keep discussion limited to Telecaster topics here. |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
TDPRI Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 26
|
Maple or Rosewood?
Which do you prefer for your fretboards, and why?
I like maple fretboards with NO glaze over them. I like how they look, and how they feel. You?
__________________
Proud Telecaster owner...finally! |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Holic
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: London, England
Age: 36
Posts: 823
|
Maple.
I prefer a one-piece maple neck, with or without lacquer.
I think rosewood fretboards sound great for Blues thanks to their darker tone, but on a maple fretboard the notes seem to say "play me!" more than rosewood. I don't have a problem with a lacquered maple board feeling 'sticky' so I'd choose maple 'cos it feels quicker to me and easier to play. Rosewood has an inherant chesty midrange 'thump' at high volumes, but I prefer maple's 'brightness' instead. It's great for snapping the strings against the neck.
__________________
TT Ridicule is nothing to be scared of! |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Meister
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: North of Dallas
Posts: 454
|
1. Maple
2. Ebony 3. Rosewood I think it has more to do with smoothness for me... I have a couple of low end guitars with rosewood boards that have an open grain... there is more friction or "catching" of the string on the lower half of the fretboard when "bottoming out" and contacting the wood when bending or using vertical vibrato motions. Maybe a plastic board or large trap inlays on every fret might be good(?). For looks alone, I like Maple. denny |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Friend of Leo's
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Pgh,Pa
Age: 53
Posts: 3,549
|
Don't matter.............
I also enjoy Maple, Rose Wood, and Ebony. With my eyes closed I probably couldn't differenciate between the 3 in tone. However touch is a different story. Certain guitars look much better with a certain fret-board. For example an LP Custom just wouldn't look good in anything but Ebony. On my Tele's I prefer Rose Wood, on my Strats I enjoy both Maple and Rose Wood. On my Custom Shop or high end guitars Brazillian Rose Wood is my fret board of choice.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Friend of Leo's
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Milyucky, Whiskonsin
Posts: 2,145
|
I would choose the wood based off of cosmetics and feel... not tone... I don't think the tonal differences are _that_ noticable between maple and rosewood...
Currently I own: Rosewood: 5 Maple: 1 Ebony: 1
__________________
"Everyone's got to be something... Me? I'm stupid... It's all I ever wanted to be... Shock me again!" |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Holic
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 894
|
I agree. I'm unconvinced that fretboard material makes any difference at all in tone. I've had dark maple-board teles, and currently have a very bright rosewood board tele. Go figure.
I prefer maple on teles, and rosewood on strats. No reason other than looks. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
Friend of Leo's
|
Rosewood for me
never could get into maple on the occasions when I played on a maple-neck. I don't really like the way maple looks, especially with the laquer finish. Maybe if I ever owned a maple neck I might have a different opinion, though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Meister
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Lincoln Nebraska
Posts: 417
|
Maple neck Teles just have more snap and twang than rosewood and I believe is the perfect Tele fretboard wood. Strat's on the other hand sound better with a rosewood board to give it that beautiful midrange bloom but that's just my ears.....and alot of time their full of wax.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
Friend of Leo's
|
I honestly can't tell whether one timber sounds different than the other. I think the reason why some folks do perceive it is because they just feel different, and therefore one would play different. Just a theory…
I love the way maple looks and feel. For example, I wish all my guitars had the neck of my 91 MIM Tele. But, now that it needs a refret, I wish it were rosewood. Refreting a maple neck is so expensive! I don't want a new neck, I want this neck… That's why I went with rosewood for my partscasters.
__________________
"That's a hard pill to swallow, buddy; when you find out what the blues is all about" |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) |
|
TDPRI Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: River Falls WIS
Posts: 25
|
I like the way maple looks on a Tele.
I can go either way on a Strat. As far as playability goes, they're all in jeopardy when I'm around. I'm more affected by the neck shape than the fretboard.
__________________
Blame Kerc |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 (permalink) |
|
Friend of Leo's
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 41
Posts: 3,735
|
I don't really have a problem playing either one, but generally I prefer maple. Maple boards just look "right" to me on most Strats and Teles, although there are exceptions - I like rosewood boards on Inca Silver Teles, sunburst Teles, and pastel coloured strats (green, blue, pink).
I definitely prefer my maple necks to be darker and lacquered - I really don't like the whitish, really dry necks found on many newer Fenders. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Meister
|
....
i prefer rosewood, just because it is more touchier to me - want to say more comfortable than a maple fretboard.
i agree, that maple sound a slight hint more bright than rosewood, but for me this is no fault, because though i dig a really snappy twangy sound, i hate those ear-piercing trebles, you often get to hear. for me playing rosewood fretboards both on my tele and strat, it smoothens the sound and cut off the harsh edges. but i have to admit, that some finish and laquers go better with maple and otherwise. take care zoppotrump :O) ______________________ may the twang be with you ! |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Holic
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Kingston, NY
Posts: 704
|
Rosewood
Going against tradition here I guess, but I have always found rosewood is more comfortable in my hands, and gives a more mellow, richer tone.
Though I have to admit that the tone thing might be psychological... |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 (permalink) |
|
TDPRI Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Saint Louis, Misery
Posts: 10
|
Maple for single coils, rosewood and ebony for humbuckers. I have no idea why though...
I like the blotchy spots on my tele's maple neck as well. It makes me feel like I am a real player, not just a collector. I'm still a newbie though, so what do I know?! :D
__________________
Papa don't preach, I'm gonna keep my jellyfish! |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 (permalink) |
|
Friend of Leo's
|
With maple I invariably get sore fingertips after a few hours playing. Plus it gets either sticky or too slippery when it's hot. Rosewood or ebony feel the same all night regardless of temperature or time spent playing. My guitars are rosewood boarded, but I'd actually prefer ebony if I could find...and afford...necks with the profile and specs I want.
I've never tried oiled maple, but I wouldn't want the inevitable grubby look it would develop. |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 (permalink) | |
|
Tele-Holic
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Modesto, CA
Age: 62
Posts: 767
|
Quote:
I have the same three -maple, ebony, and rosewood - and the rosewood feels and sounds like it grates ("when bending or using vertical vibrato motions"), albeit, ever so slightly, as compared to the ebony, and nothing but "smooth as butter" on the maple! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Meister
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Pittston, Maine
Posts: 475
|
Maple for Teles and Strats. I feel like I DO hear a tonal difference - I always hated Strat tones until I realized that all the Strat players I like play on a maple fingerboard. And so it was...
Tele, well, yeah, I think Teles snap and growl more with a maple neck. With a rosewood board they just sound too danged respectable...
__________________
What we lack in expertise we make up for in enthusiasm. |
|
|
|